Cargando…

A method of respiratory phase optimization for better dose sparing of organs at risks: A validation study in patients with lung cancer

BACKGROUND: To propose an effective and simple cost value function to determine an optimal respiratory phase for lung treatment using either respiratory gating or breath-hold technique. RESULTS: The optimized phase was obtained at a phase close to end inhalation in 11 out of 15 patients. For the res...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kang, Seong-Hee, Kim, Siyong, Kim, Dong-Su, Kim, Tae-Ho, Park, So-Hyun, Shin, Dong-Seok, Kim, Kyeong-Hyeon, Cho, Min-Seok, Kim, YeonSil, Suh, Tae Suk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5787457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29416607
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.23353
_version_ 1783295933226680320
author Kang, Seong-Hee
Kim, Siyong
Kim, Dong-Su
Kim, Tae-Ho
Park, So-Hyun
Shin, Dong-Seok
Kim, Kyeong-Hyeon
Cho, Min-Seok
Kim, YeonSil
Suh, Tae Suk
author_facet Kang, Seong-Hee
Kim, Siyong
Kim, Dong-Su
Kim, Tae-Ho
Park, So-Hyun
Shin, Dong-Seok
Kim, Kyeong-Hyeon
Cho, Min-Seok
Kim, YeonSil
Suh, Tae Suk
author_sort Kang, Seong-Hee
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To propose an effective and simple cost value function to determine an optimal respiratory phase for lung treatment using either respiratory gating or breath-hold technique. RESULTS: The optimized phase was obtained at a phase close to end inhalation in 11 out of 15 patients. For the rest of patients, the optimized phase was obtained at a phase close to end exhalation indicating that optimal phase can be patient specific. The mean doses of the Organs-at-risk (OARs) significantly decreased at the optimized phase without compromising the planning target volume (PTV) coverage (about 8% for all 3 OARs considered). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen lung patients were included for the feasibility test of the cost function. For all patients and all phases, delineation of the target volume and selected OARs such as esophagus, heart, and spinal cord was performed, and then cost values were calculated for all phases. After the breathing phases were ranked according to the cost values obtained, the relationship between score and dose distribution was evaluated by comparing dose volume histogram (DVH). CONCLUSIONS: The proposed cost value function can play an important role in choosing an optimal phase with minimal effort, that is, without actual plan optimization at all phases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5787457
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57874572018-02-07 A method of respiratory phase optimization for better dose sparing of organs at risks: A validation study in patients with lung cancer Kang, Seong-Hee Kim, Siyong Kim, Dong-Su Kim, Tae-Ho Park, So-Hyun Shin, Dong-Seok Kim, Kyeong-Hyeon Cho, Min-Seok Kim, YeonSil Suh, Tae Suk Oncotarget Research Paper BACKGROUND: To propose an effective and simple cost value function to determine an optimal respiratory phase for lung treatment using either respiratory gating or breath-hold technique. RESULTS: The optimized phase was obtained at a phase close to end inhalation in 11 out of 15 patients. For the rest of patients, the optimized phase was obtained at a phase close to end exhalation indicating that optimal phase can be patient specific. The mean doses of the Organs-at-risk (OARs) significantly decreased at the optimized phase without compromising the planning target volume (PTV) coverage (about 8% for all 3 OARs considered). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen lung patients were included for the feasibility test of the cost function. For all patients and all phases, delineation of the target volume and selected OARs such as esophagus, heart, and spinal cord was performed, and then cost values were calculated for all phases. After the breathing phases were ranked according to the cost values obtained, the relationship between score and dose distribution was evaluated by comparing dose volume histogram (DVH). CONCLUSIONS: The proposed cost value function can play an important role in choosing an optimal phase with minimal effort, that is, without actual plan optimization at all phases. Impact Journals LLC 2017-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5787457/ /pubmed/29416607 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.23353 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Kang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) 3.0 (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Kang, Seong-Hee
Kim, Siyong
Kim, Dong-Su
Kim, Tae-Ho
Park, So-Hyun
Shin, Dong-Seok
Kim, Kyeong-Hyeon
Cho, Min-Seok
Kim, YeonSil
Suh, Tae Suk
A method of respiratory phase optimization for better dose sparing of organs at risks: A validation study in patients with lung cancer
title A method of respiratory phase optimization for better dose sparing of organs at risks: A validation study in patients with lung cancer
title_full A method of respiratory phase optimization for better dose sparing of organs at risks: A validation study in patients with lung cancer
title_fullStr A method of respiratory phase optimization for better dose sparing of organs at risks: A validation study in patients with lung cancer
title_full_unstemmed A method of respiratory phase optimization for better dose sparing of organs at risks: A validation study in patients with lung cancer
title_short A method of respiratory phase optimization for better dose sparing of organs at risks: A validation study in patients with lung cancer
title_sort method of respiratory phase optimization for better dose sparing of organs at risks: a validation study in patients with lung cancer
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5787457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29416607
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.23353
work_keys_str_mv AT kangseonghee amethodofrespiratoryphaseoptimizationforbetterdosesparingoforgansatrisksavalidationstudyinpatientswithlungcancer
AT kimsiyong amethodofrespiratoryphaseoptimizationforbetterdosesparingoforgansatrisksavalidationstudyinpatientswithlungcancer
AT kimdongsu amethodofrespiratoryphaseoptimizationforbetterdosesparingoforgansatrisksavalidationstudyinpatientswithlungcancer
AT kimtaeho amethodofrespiratoryphaseoptimizationforbetterdosesparingoforgansatrisksavalidationstudyinpatientswithlungcancer
AT parksohyun amethodofrespiratoryphaseoptimizationforbetterdosesparingoforgansatrisksavalidationstudyinpatientswithlungcancer
AT shindongseok amethodofrespiratoryphaseoptimizationforbetterdosesparingoforgansatrisksavalidationstudyinpatientswithlungcancer
AT kimkyeonghyeon amethodofrespiratoryphaseoptimizationforbetterdosesparingoforgansatrisksavalidationstudyinpatientswithlungcancer
AT chominseok amethodofrespiratoryphaseoptimizationforbetterdosesparingoforgansatrisksavalidationstudyinpatientswithlungcancer
AT kimyeonsil amethodofrespiratoryphaseoptimizationforbetterdosesparingoforgansatrisksavalidationstudyinpatientswithlungcancer
AT suhtaesuk amethodofrespiratoryphaseoptimizationforbetterdosesparingoforgansatrisksavalidationstudyinpatientswithlungcancer
AT kangseonghee methodofrespiratoryphaseoptimizationforbetterdosesparingoforgansatrisksavalidationstudyinpatientswithlungcancer
AT kimsiyong methodofrespiratoryphaseoptimizationforbetterdosesparingoforgansatrisksavalidationstudyinpatientswithlungcancer
AT kimdongsu methodofrespiratoryphaseoptimizationforbetterdosesparingoforgansatrisksavalidationstudyinpatientswithlungcancer
AT kimtaeho methodofrespiratoryphaseoptimizationforbetterdosesparingoforgansatrisksavalidationstudyinpatientswithlungcancer
AT parksohyun methodofrespiratoryphaseoptimizationforbetterdosesparingoforgansatrisksavalidationstudyinpatientswithlungcancer
AT shindongseok methodofrespiratoryphaseoptimizationforbetterdosesparingoforgansatrisksavalidationstudyinpatientswithlungcancer
AT kimkyeonghyeon methodofrespiratoryphaseoptimizationforbetterdosesparingoforgansatrisksavalidationstudyinpatientswithlungcancer
AT chominseok methodofrespiratoryphaseoptimizationforbetterdosesparingoforgansatrisksavalidationstudyinpatientswithlungcancer
AT kimyeonsil methodofrespiratoryphaseoptimizationforbetterdosesparingoforgansatrisksavalidationstudyinpatientswithlungcancer
AT suhtaesuk methodofrespiratoryphaseoptimizationforbetterdosesparingoforgansatrisksavalidationstudyinpatientswithlungcancer