Cargando…
Clinical features, antimicrobial susceptibilities, and treatment outcomes of patients with culture positive endophthalmitis after penetrating keratoplasty
PURPOSE: To report the clinical features organisms and treatment outcomes in patients with endophthalmitis after penetrating keratoplasty (PK) METHODS: Retrospective noncomparative case series. RESULTS: Eleven eyes of 11 patients with culture positive endophthalmitis after PK were included. The time...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5787880/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29468222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajoc.2018.01.011 |
_version_ | 1783296010862198784 |
---|---|
author | Tran, Kimberly D. Yannuzzi, Nicolas A. Si, Nancy Patel, Nimesh A. Miller, Darlene Amescua, Guillermo Berrocal, Audina M. Flynn, Harry W. |
author_facet | Tran, Kimberly D. Yannuzzi, Nicolas A. Si, Nancy Patel, Nimesh A. Miller, Darlene Amescua, Guillermo Berrocal, Audina M. Flynn, Harry W. |
author_sort | Tran, Kimberly D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To report the clinical features organisms and treatment outcomes in patients with endophthalmitis after penetrating keratoplasty (PK) METHODS: Retrospective noncomparative case series. RESULTS: Eleven eyes of 11 patients with culture positive endophthalmitis after PK were included. The time to diagnosis of endophthalmitis from last PK was less than 1 week in 3/11 (27%), between 1 and 4 weeks in 3/11 (27%), and greater than one month in 5/11 (46%) (range 2–924 days). The distribution of isolates included gram positive (GP) 9/11 (82%), gram negative (GN) 1/11 (9%), and fungal 1/11 (9%) species, respectively. Of GP bacteria tested, 9/9 (100%) were sensitive to Vancomycin. Of fungal isolates tested, none (0/1) were sensitive to Amphoteracin, Fluconazole, and/or Voriconazole. Among patients with rim culture data available, 1/7 (14%) donor rims were culture positive for Candida glabrata and 6/7 (86%) were culture negative. Patients were treated with primary tap and inject in 10/11 (91%) and primary vitrectomy in 1/11 (9%). VA of ≥5/200 was present in 2/11 (18%) at time of endophthalmitis diagnosis, and was recorded in 6/11 (55%) at last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPORTANCE: Patients with endophthalmitis after PK presented at variable time points after surgery. Gram positive organisms were the most common isolate. VA outcomes after treatment were generally poor. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5787880 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57878802018-02-21 Clinical features, antimicrobial susceptibilities, and treatment outcomes of patients with culture positive endophthalmitis after penetrating keratoplasty Tran, Kimberly D. Yannuzzi, Nicolas A. Si, Nancy Patel, Nimesh A. Miller, Darlene Amescua, Guillermo Berrocal, Audina M. Flynn, Harry W. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep Brief report PURPOSE: To report the clinical features organisms and treatment outcomes in patients with endophthalmitis after penetrating keratoplasty (PK) METHODS: Retrospective noncomparative case series. RESULTS: Eleven eyes of 11 patients with culture positive endophthalmitis after PK were included. The time to diagnosis of endophthalmitis from last PK was less than 1 week in 3/11 (27%), between 1 and 4 weeks in 3/11 (27%), and greater than one month in 5/11 (46%) (range 2–924 days). The distribution of isolates included gram positive (GP) 9/11 (82%), gram negative (GN) 1/11 (9%), and fungal 1/11 (9%) species, respectively. Of GP bacteria tested, 9/9 (100%) were sensitive to Vancomycin. Of fungal isolates tested, none (0/1) were sensitive to Amphoteracin, Fluconazole, and/or Voriconazole. Among patients with rim culture data available, 1/7 (14%) donor rims were culture positive for Candida glabrata and 6/7 (86%) were culture negative. Patients were treated with primary tap and inject in 10/11 (91%) and primary vitrectomy in 1/11 (9%). VA of ≥5/200 was present in 2/11 (18%) at time of endophthalmitis diagnosis, and was recorded in 6/11 (55%) at last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPORTANCE: Patients with endophthalmitis after PK presented at variable time points after surgery. Gram positive organisms were the most common isolate. VA outcomes after treatment were generally poor. Elsevier 2018-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5787880/ /pubmed/29468222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajoc.2018.01.011 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Brief report Tran, Kimberly D. Yannuzzi, Nicolas A. Si, Nancy Patel, Nimesh A. Miller, Darlene Amescua, Guillermo Berrocal, Audina M. Flynn, Harry W. Clinical features, antimicrobial susceptibilities, and treatment outcomes of patients with culture positive endophthalmitis after penetrating keratoplasty |
title | Clinical features, antimicrobial susceptibilities, and treatment outcomes of patients with culture positive endophthalmitis after penetrating keratoplasty |
title_full | Clinical features, antimicrobial susceptibilities, and treatment outcomes of patients with culture positive endophthalmitis after penetrating keratoplasty |
title_fullStr | Clinical features, antimicrobial susceptibilities, and treatment outcomes of patients with culture positive endophthalmitis after penetrating keratoplasty |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical features, antimicrobial susceptibilities, and treatment outcomes of patients with culture positive endophthalmitis after penetrating keratoplasty |
title_short | Clinical features, antimicrobial susceptibilities, and treatment outcomes of patients with culture positive endophthalmitis after penetrating keratoplasty |
title_sort | clinical features, antimicrobial susceptibilities, and treatment outcomes of patients with culture positive endophthalmitis after penetrating keratoplasty |
topic | Brief report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5787880/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29468222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajoc.2018.01.011 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT trankimberlyd clinicalfeaturesantimicrobialsusceptibilitiesandtreatmentoutcomesofpatientswithculturepositiveendophthalmitisafterpenetratingkeratoplasty AT yannuzzinicolasa clinicalfeaturesantimicrobialsusceptibilitiesandtreatmentoutcomesofpatientswithculturepositiveendophthalmitisafterpenetratingkeratoplasty AT sinancy clinicalfeaturesantimicrobialsusceptibilitiesandtreatmentoutcomesofpatientswithculturepositiveendophthalmitisafterpenetratingkeratoplasty AT patelnimesha clinicalfeaturesantimicrobialsusceptibilitiesandtreatmentoutcomesofpatientswithculturepositiveendophthalmitisafterpenetratingkeratoplasty AT millerdarlene clinicalfeaturesantimicrobialsusceptibilitiesandtreatmentoutcomesofpatientswithculturepositiveendophthalmitisafterpenetratingkeratoplasty AT amescuaguillermo clinicalfeaturesantimicrobialsusceptibilitiesandtreatmentoutcomesofpatientswithculturepositiveendophthalmitisafterpenetratingkeratoplasty AT berrocalaudinam clinicalfeaturesantimicrobialsusceptibilitiesandtreatmentoutcomesofpatientswithculturepositiveendophthalmitisafterpenetratingkeratoplasty AT flynnharryw clinicalfeaturesantimicrobialsusceptibilitiesandtreatmentoutcomesofpatientswithculturepositiveendophthalmitisafterpenetratingkeratoplasty |