Cargando…

Clinical features, antimicrobial susceptibilities, and treatment outcomes of patients with culture positive endophthalmitis after penetrating keratoplasty

PURPOSE: To report the clinical features organisms and treatment outcomes in patients with endophthalmitis after penetrating keratoplasty (PK) METHODS: Retrospective noncomparative case series. RESULTS: Eleven eyes of 11 patients with culture positive endophthalmitis after PK were included. The time...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tran, Kimberly D., Yannuzzi, Nicolas A., Si, Nancy, Patel, Nimesh A., Miller, Darlene, Amescua, Guillermo, Berrocal, Audina M., Flynn, Harry W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5787880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29468222
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajoc.2018.01.011
_version_ 1783296010862198784
author Tran, Kimberly D.
Yannuzzi, Nicolas A.
Si, Nancy
Patel, Nimesh A.
Miller, Darlene
Amescua, Guillermo
Berrocal, Audina M.
Flynn, Harry W.
author_facet Tran, Kimberly D.
Yannuzzi, Nicolas A.
Si, Nancy
Patel, Nimesh A.
Miller, Darlene
Amescua, Guillermo
Berrocal, Audina M.
Flynn, Harry W.
author_sort Tran, Kimberly D.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To report the clinical features organisms and treatment outcomes in patients with endophthalmitis after penetrating keratoplasty (PK) METHODS: Retrospective noncomparative case series. RESULTS: Eleven eyes of 11 patients with culture positive endophthalmitis after PK were included. The time to diagnosis of endophthalmitis from last PK was less than 1 week in 3/11 (27%), between 1 and 4 weeks in 3/11 (27%), and greater than one month in 5/11 (46%) (range 2–924 days). The distribution of isolates included gram positive (GP) 9/11 (82%), gram negative (GN) 1/11 (9%), and fungal 1/11 (9%) species, respectively. Of GP bacteria tested, 9/9 (100%) were sensitive to Vancomycin. Of fungal isolates tested, none (0/1) were sensitive to Amphoteracin, Fluconazole, and/or Voriconazole. Among patients with rim culture data available, 1/7 (14%) donor rims were culture positive for Candida glabrata and 6/7 (86%) were culture negative. Patients were treated with primary tap and inject in 10/11 (91%) and primary vitrectomy in 1/11 (9%). VA of ≥5/200 was present in 2/11 (18%) at time of endophthalmitis diagnosis, and was recorded in 6/11 (55%) at last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPORTANCE: Patients with endophthalmitis after PK presented at variable time points after surgery. Gram positive organisms were the most common isolate. VA outcomes after treatment were generally poor.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5787880
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57878802018-02-21 Clinical features, antimicrobial susceptibilities, and treatment outcomes of patients with culture positive endophthalmitis after penetrating keratoplasty Tran, Kimberly D. Yannuzzi, Nicolas A. Si, Nancy Patel, Nimesh A. Miller, Darlene Amescua, Guillermo Berrocal, Audina M. Flynn, Harry W. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep Brief report PURPOSE: To report the clinical features organisms and treatment outcomes in patients with endophthalmitis after penetrating keratoplasty (PK) METHODS: Retrospective noncomparative case series. RESULTS: Eleven eyes of 11 patients with culture positive endophthalmitis after PK were included. The time to diagnosis of endophthalmitis from last PK was less than 1 week in 3/11 (27%), between 1 and 4 weeks in 3/11 (27%), and greater than one month in 5/11 (46%) (range 2–924 days). The distribution of isolates included gram positive (GP) 9/11 (82%), gram negative (GN) 1/11 (9%), and fungal 1/11 (9%) species, respectively. Of GP bacteria tested, 9/9 (100%) were sensitive to Vancomycin. Of fungal isolates tested, none (0/1) were sensitive to Amphoteracin, Fluconazole, and/or Voriconazole. Among patients with rim culture data available, 1/7 (14%) donor rims were culture positive for Candida glabrata and 6/7 (86%) were culture negative. Patients were treated with primary tap and inject in 10/11 (91%) and primary vitrectomy in 1/11 (9%). VA of ≥5/200 was present in 2/11 (18%) at time of endophthalmitis diagnosis, and was recorded in 6/11 (55%) at last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPORTANCE: Patients with endophthalmitis after PK presented at variable time points after surgery. Gram positive organisms were the most common isolate. VA outcomes after treatment were generally poor. Elsevier 2018-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5787880/ /pubmed/29468222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajoc.2018.01.011 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Brief report
Tran, Kimberly D.
Yannuzzi, Nicolas A.
Si, Nancy
Patel, Nimesh A.
Miller, Darlene
Amescua, Guillermo
Berrocal, Audina M.
Flynn, Harry W.
Clinical features, antimicrobial susceptibilities, and treatment outcomes of patients with culture positive endophthalmitis after penetrating keratoplasty
title Clinical features, antimicrobial susceptibilities, and treatment outcomes of patients with culture positive endophthalmitis after penetrating keratoplasty
title_full Clinical features, antimicrobial susceptibilities, and treatment outcomes of patients with culture positive endophthalmitis after penetrating keratoplasty
title_fullStr Clinical features, antimicrobial susceptibilities, and treatment outcomes of patients with culture positive endophthalmitis after penetrating keratoplasty
title_full_unstemmed Clinical features, antimicrobial susceptibilities, and treatment outcomes of patients with culture positive endophthalmitis after penetrating keratoplasty
title_short Clinical features, antimicrobial susceptibilities, and treatment outcomes of patients with culture positive endophthalmitis after penetrating keratoplasty
title_sort clinical features, antimicrobial susceptibilities, and treatment outcomes of patients with culture positive endophthalmitis after penetrating keratoplasty
topic Brief report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5787880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29468222
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajoc.2018.01.011
work_keys_str_mv AT trankimberlyd clinicalfeaturesantimicrobialsusceptibilitiesandtreatmentoutcomesofpatientswithculturepositiveendophthalmitisafterpenetratingkeratoplasty
AT yannuzzinicolasa clinicalfeaturesantimicrobialsusceptibilitiesandtreatmentoutcomesofpatientswithculturepositiveendophthalmitisafterpenetratingkeratoplasty
AT sinancy clinicalfeaturesantimicrobialsusceptibilitiesandtreatmentoutcomesofpatientswithculturepositiveendophthalmitisafterpenetratingkeratoplasty
AT patelnimesha clinicalfeaturesantimicrobialsusceptibilitiesandtreatmentoutcomesofpatientswithculturepositiveendophthalmitisafterpenetratingkeratoplasty
AT millerdarlene clinicalfeaturesantimicrobialsusceptibilitiesandtreatmentoutcomesofpatientswithculturepositiveendophthalmitisafterpenetratingkeratoplasty
AT amescuaguillermo clinicalfeaturesantimicrobialsusceptibilitiesandtreatmentoutcomesofpatientswithculturepositiveendophthalmitisafterpenetratingkeratoplasty
AT berrocalaudinam clinicalfeaturesantimicrobialsusceptibilitiesandtreatmentoutcomesofpatientswithculturepositiveendophthalmitisafterpenetratingkeratoplasty
AT flynnharryw clinicalfeaturesantimicrobialsusceptibilitiesandtreatmentoutcomesofpatientswithculturepositiveendophthalmitisafterpenetratingkeratoplasty