Cargando…

Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery in China: Multi-Center Experience

BACKGROUND: To the best of our knowledge, there is no nationwide data available on the development of minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) in China. The purpose of this study was to report the results of MICS in 6 experienced centers in China. MATERIAL/METHODS: From September 2014 to July 2016,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hua, Kun, Zhao, Yang, Dong, Ran, Liu, Taoshuai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5788050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29353871
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.905408
_version_ 1783296041926262784
author Hua, Kun
Zhao, Yang
Dong, Ran
Liu, Taoshuai
author_facet Hua, Kun
Zhao, Yang
Dong, Ran
Liu, Taoshuai
author_sort Hua, Kun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To the best of our knowledge, there is no nationwide data available on the development of minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) in China. The purpose of this study was to report the results of MICS in 6 experienced centers in China. MATERIAL/METHODS: From September 2014 to July 2016, 1241 patients with cardiac conditions who underwent MICS procedures were randomly enrolled in 6 centers in China, and those patients were randomly selected for inclusion in this study. The MICS procedures were defined as any cardiac surgery performed through a less invasive incision, rather than a complete median sternotomy, mainly including mini-incision surgery (400, 32.2%), video-assisted approach (265, 21.3%), completely thoracoscopic approach without robotic assistance (504, 40.6%), and robotic procedure (55, 4.4%). RESULTS: The 5 most common in-hospital complications were respiratory failure (28, 2.3%), reoperation for all reasons (19, 1.5%), renal failure (11, 0.9%), heart failure (9, 0.7%), and stroke (6, 0.5%). The multivariate logistic regression analysis results showed that cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time (P=0.033), aortic cross-clamp time (P=0.003), cannulation approach (P=0.010), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (P=0.003) at baseline were all significant risk factors of any in-hospital complication of MICS procedures. CONCLUSIONS: From our experience, minimally invasive cardiac approaches are safe and reproducible, with acceptable CPB and aortic cross-clamp time duration and low mortality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5788050
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher International Scientific Literature, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57880502018-01-31 Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery in China: Multi-Center Experience Hua, Kun Zhao, Yang Dong, Ran Liu, Taoshuai Med Sci Monit Clinical Research BACKGROUND: To the best of our knowledge, there is no nationwide data available on the development of minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) in China. The purpose of this study was to report the results of MICS in 6 experienced centers in China. MATERIAL/METHODS: From September 2014 to July 2016, 1241 patients with cardiac conditions who underwent MICS procedures were randomly enrolled in 6 centers in China, and those patients were randomly selected for inclusion in this study. The MICS procedures were defined as any cardiac surgery performed through a less invasive incision, rather than a complete median sternotomy, mainly including mini-incision surgery (400, 32.2%), video-assisted approach (265, 21.3%), completely thoracoscopic approach without robotic assistance (504, 40.6%), and robotic procedure (55, 4.4%). RESULTS: The 5 most common in-hospital complications were respiratory failure (28, 2.3%), reoperation for all reasons (19, 1.5%), renal failure (11, 0.9%), heart failure (9, 0.7%), and stroke (6, 0.5%). The multivariate logistic regression analysis results showed that cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time (P=0.033), aortic cross-clamp time (P=0.003), cannulation approach (P=0.010), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (P=0.003) at baseline were all significant risk factors of any in-hospital complication of MICS procedures. CONCLUSIONS: From our experience, minimally invasive cardiac approaches are safe and reproducible, with acceptable CPB and aortic cross-clamp time duration and low mortality. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2018-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5788050/ /pubmed/29353871 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.905408 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2018 This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Hua, Kun
Zhao, Yang
Dong, Ran
Liu, Taoshuai
Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery in China: Multi-Center Experience
title Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery in China: Multi-Center Experience
title_full Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery in China: Multi-Center Experience
title_fullStr Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery in China: Multi-Center Experience
title_full_unstemmed Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery in China: Multi-Center Experience
title_short Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery in China: Multi-Center Experience
title_sort minimally invasive cardiac surgery in china: multi-center experience
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5788050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29353871
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.905408
work_keys_str_mv AT huakun minimallyinvasivecardiacsurgeryinchinamulticenterexperience
AT zhaoyang minimallyinvasivecardiacsurgeryinchinamulticenterexperience
AT dongran minimallyinvasivecardiacsurgeryinchinamulticenterexperience
AT liutaoshuai minimallyinvasivecardiacsurgeryinchinamulticenterexperience