Cargando…

Endovascular management of pancreatitis-related pseudoaneurysms: A review of techniques

OBJECTIVES: To present the various techniques used in the management of pancreatitis-related pseudoaneurysms of visceral vessels. METHODS: The retrospective clinical study was carried out at the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology at Poznan University of Medical Sciences from 2011...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zabicki, Bartosz, Limphaibool, Nattakarn, Holstad, Marte Johanne Veilemand, Juszkat, Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5788383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29377944
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191998
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: To present the various techniques used in the management of pancreatitis-related pseudoaneurysms of visceral vessels. METHODS: The retrospective clinical study was carried out at the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology at Poznan University of Medical Sciences from 2011 to 2016. The fifteen patients included in the study were diagnosed with pseudoaneurysms of visceral arteries, as a complication of chronic pancreatitis. The diagnosis was made using contrast-enhanced computed tomography, followed by angiography. On admission, all patients were symptomatic, with varying degrees of abdominal pain. One patient was haemodynamically unstable. Treatments with endovascular techniques were analysed, along with their efficacy and outcomes. Coil embolisation was performed in 5 patients. Stent graft was used in 1 patient. Liquid embolic agents were used in 7 cases, of which 5 patients were treated with thrombin injection and 2 with Squid. A combination of techniques was used in 2 patients. RESULTS: The most common artery affected by pseudoaneurysm formation was the splenic artery (7/15; 46.7%), and the size of the pseudoaneurysms ranged from 27 mm to 85 mm. Primary technical success was achieved in 14 out of 15 patients (93.3%). One patient required reintervention. Two patients required splenectomy after embolisation due to splenic ischemia. No recanalisation was present at the follow-up computed tomography performed after 1 to 3 weeks, and no mortality was observed within 30 days. CONCLUSION: Vascular complications of pancreatitis require accurate diagnosis and immediate treatment. Endovascular intervention is highly effective and is the preferred treatment option. The technique used is determined based on vascular anatomy and the patient’s haemodynamic status.