Cargando…

Improving C1-C2 Complex Fusion Rates: An Alternate Approach

The surgical repair of atlantoaxial instabilities (AAI) presents complex and unique challenges, originating from abnormalities and/or trauma within the junction regions of the C1-C2 atlas-axis, to surgeons. When this region is destabilized, surgical fusion becomes of key importance in order to preve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ghostine, Samer S, Kaloostian, Paul E, Ordookhanian, Christ, Kaloostian, Sean, Zarrini, Parham, Kim, Terrence, Scibelli, Stephen, Clark-Schoeb, Scott J, Samudrala, Srinath, Lauryssen, Carl, Gill, Amandip S, Johnson, Patrick J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5788400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29392099
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.1887
_version_ 1783296083906002944
author Ghostine, Samer S
Kaloostian, Paul E
Ordookhanian, Christ
Kaloostian, Sean
Zarrini, Parham
Kim, Terrence
Scibelli, Stephen
Clark-Schoeb, Scott J
Samudrala, Srinath
Lauryssen, Carl
Gill, Amandip S
Johnson, Patrick J
author_facet Ghostine, Samer S
Kaloostian, Paul E
Ordookhanian, Christ
Kaloostian, Sean
Zarrini, Parham
Kim, Terrence
Scibelli, Stephen
Clark-Schoeb, Scott J
Samudrala, Srinath
Lauryssen, Carl
Gill, Amandip S
Johnson, Patrick J
author_sort Ghostine, Samer S
collection PubMed
description The surgical repair of atlantoaxial instabilities (AAI) presents complex and unique challenges, originating from abnormalities and/or trauma within the junction regions of the C1-C2 atlas-axis, to surgeons. When this region is destabilized, surgical fusion becomes of key importance in order to prevent spinal cord injury. Several techniques can be utilized to provide for the adequate fusion of the atlantoaxial construct. Nevertheless, many individuals have less than ideal rates of fusion, below 35%-40%, which also involves the C2 nerve root being sacrificed. This suboptimal and unavoidable iatrogenic complication results in the elevated probability of complications typically composed of vertebral artery injury. This review is a retrospective analysis of 87 patients from Cedars Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles, California, who had the C1-C2 surgical fusion procedure performed within the time frame from 2001 to 2008, with a mean follow-up period of three years. These patients had presented with typical AAI symptoms of fatigability, limited mobility, and clumsiness. Diagnosis of C1-C2 instability was documented via radiographic studies, typically utilizing computed tomography (CT) scans or x-rays. All patients had bilateral C1 lateral masses and C2 pedicle screws. In addition, the C1-C2 joint was accessed by retracting the C2 nerve root superiorly and exposing the joint by utilizing a high-speed burr. The cavity that is developed within the joint is packed with local autologous bone from the cephalad resection of the C2 laminae. Fusion of the C1-C2 joint was achieved in all patients and a final follow-up was conducted approximately three years postoperative. Of the 87 patients, two presented with occipital headaches resulting from the C1 screws impinging on the C2 nerve root. The issue was rectified by removing instrumentation in both patients after documenting complete fusion via radiographic studies, with complete resolution of symptoms. No vertebral artery or spinal cord injuries were reported as a result of the minor complication. Overall, we aim to describe a safe and reliable alternative technique to fuse C1-C2 instability by focusing on intra-articular arthrodesis complementing instrumentation fixation. This methodology is advantageous from a biomechanical standpoint secondary to axial loading, as well as the large surface area available for arthrodesis. Additionally, this technique does not involve the resection of the C2 nerve root, resulting in low risk for vertebral artery or spinal cord injury.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5788400
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57884002018-02-01 Improving C1-C2 Complex Fusion Rates: An Alternate Approach Ghostine, Samer S Kaloostian, Paul E Ordookhanian, Christ Kaloostian, Sean Zarrini, Parham Kim, Terrence Scibelli, Stephen Clark-Schoeb, Scott J Samudrala, Srinath Lauryssen, Carl Gill, Amandip S Johnson, Patrick J Cureus Neurology The surgical repair of atlantoaxial instabilities (AAI) presents complex and unique challenges, originating from abnormalities and/or trauma within the junction regions of the C1-C2 atlas-axis, to surgeons. When this region is destabilized, surgical fusion becomes of key importance in order to prevent spinal cord injury. Several techniques can be utilized to provide for the adequate fusion of the atlantoaxial construct. Nevertheless, many individuals have less than ideal rates of fusion, below 35%-40%, which also involves the C2 nerve root being sacrificed. This suboptimal and unavoidable iatrogenic complication results in the elevated probability of complications typically composed of vertebral artery injury. This review is a retrospective analysis of 87 patients from Cedars Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles, California, who had the C1-C2 surgical fusion procedure performed within the time frame from 2001 to 2008, with a mean follow-up period of three years. These patients had presented with typical AAI symptoms of fatigability, limited mobility, and clumsiness. Diagnosis of C1-C2 instability was documented via radiographic studies, typically utilizing computed tomography (CT) scans or x-rays. All patients had bilateral C1 lateral masses and C2 pedicle screws. In addition, the C1-C2 joint was accessed by retracting the C2 nerve root superiorly and exposing the joint by utilizing a high-speed burr. The cavity that is developed within the joint is packed with local autologous bone from the cephalad resection of the C2 laminae. Fusion of the C1-C2 joint was achieved in all patients and a final follow-up was conducted approximately three years postoperative. Of the 87 patients, two presented with occipital headaches resulting from the C1 screws impinging on the C2 nerve root. The issue was rectified by removing instrumentation in both patients after documenting complete fusion via radiographic studies, with complete resolution of symptoms. No vertebral artery or spinal cord injuries were reported as a result of the minor complication. Overall, we aim to describe a safe and reliable alternative technique to fuse C1-C2 instability by focusing on intra-articular arthrodesis complementing instrumentation fixation. This methodology is advantageous from a biomechanical standpoint secondary to axial loading, as well as the large surface area available for arthrodesis. Additionally, this technique does not involve the resection of the C2 nerve root, resulting in low risk for vertebral artery or spinal cord injury. Cureus 2017-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5788400/ /pubmed/29392099 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.1887 Text en Copyright © 2017, Ghostine et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Neurology
Ghostine, Samer S
Kaloostian, Paul E
Ordookhanian, Christ
Kaloostian, Sean
Zarrini, Parham
Kim, Terrence
Scibelli, Stephen
Clark-Schoeb, Scott J
Samudrala, Srinath
Lauryssen, Carl
Gill, Amandip S
Johnson, Patrick J
Improving C1-C2 Complex Fusion Rates: An Alternate Approach
title Improving C1-C2 Complex Fusion Rates: An Alternate Approach
title_full Improving C1-C2 Complex Fusion Rates: An Alternate Approach
title_fullStr Improving C1-C2 Complex Fusion Rates: An Alternate Approach
title_full_unstemmed Improving C1-C2 Complex Fusion Rates: An Alternate Approach
title_short Improving C1-C2 Complex Fusion Rates: An Alternate Approach
title_sort improving c1-c2 complex fusion rates: an alternate approach
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5788400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29392099
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.1887
work_keys_str_mv AT ghostinesamers improvingc1c2complexfusionratesanalternateapproach
AT kaloostianpaule improvingc1c2complexfusionratesanalternateapproach
AT ordookhanianchrist improvingc1c2complexfusionratesanalternateapproach
AT kaloostiansean improvingc1c2complexfusionratesanalternateapproach
AT zarriniparham improvingc1c2complexfusionratesanalternateapproach
AT kimterrence improvingc1c2complexfusionratesanalternateapproach
AT scibellistephen improvingc1c2complexfusionratesanalternateapproach
AT clarkschoebscottj improvingc1c2complexfusionratesanalternateapproach
AT samudralasrinath improvingc1c2complexfusionratesanalternateapproach
AT lauryssencarl improvingc1c2complexfusionratesanalternateapproach
AT gillamandips improvingc1c2complexfusionratesanalternateapproach
AT johnsonpatrickj improvingc1c2complexfusionratesanalternateapproach