Cargando…

Automatic Detection of Compensation During Robotic Stroke Rehabilitation Therapy

Robotic stroke rehabilitation therapy can greatly increase the efficiency of therapy delivery. However, when left unsupervised, users often compensate for limitations in affected muscles and joints by recruiting unaffected muscles and joints, leading to undesirable rehabilitation outcomes. This pape...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: IEEE 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5788403/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29404226
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JTEHM.2017.2780836
_version_ 1783296084614840320
collection PubMed
description Robotic stroke rehabilitation therapy can greatly increase the efficiency of therapy delivery. However, when left unsupervised, users often compensate for limitations in affected muscles and joints by recruiting unaffected muscles and joints, leading to undesirable rehabilitation outcomes. This paper aims to develop a computer vision system that augments robotic stroke rehabilitation therapy by automatically detecting such compensatory motions. Nine stroke survivors and ten healthy adults participated in this study. All participants completed scripted motions using a table-top rehabilitation robot. The healthy participants also simulated three types of compensatory motions. The 3-D trajectories of upper body joint positions tracked over time were used for multiclass classification of postures. A support vector machine (SVM) classifier detected lean-forward compensation from healthy participants with excellent accuracy (AUC = 0.98, F1 = 0.82), followed by trunk-rotation compensation (AUC = 0.77, F1 = 0.57). Shoulder-elevation compensation was not well detected (AUC = 0.66, F1 = 0.07). A recurrent neural network (RNN) classifier, which encodes the temporal dependency of video frames, obtained similar results. In contrast, F1-scores in stroke survivors were low for all three compensations while using RNN: lean-forward compensation (AUC = 0.77, F1 = 0.17), trunk-rotation compensation (AUC = 0.81, F1 = 0.27), and shoulder-elevation compensation (AUC = 0.27, F1 = 0.07). The result was similar while using SVM. To improve detection accuracy for stroke survivors, future work should focus on predefining the range of motion, direct camera placement, delivering exercise intensity tantamount to that of real stroke therapies, adjusting seat height, and recording full therapy sessions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5788403
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher IEEE
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57884032018-02-05 Automatic Detection of Compensation During Robotic Stroke Rehabilitation Therapy IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med Article Robotic stroke rehabilitation therapy can greatly increase the efficiency of therapy delivery. However, when left unsupervised, users often compensate for limitations in affected muscles and joints by recruiting unaffected muscles and joints, leading to undesirable rehabilitation outcomes. This paper aims to develop a computer vision system that augments robotic stroke rehabilitation therapy by automatically detecting such compensatory motions. Nine stroke survivors and ten healthy adults participated in this study. All participants completed scripted motions using a table-top rehabilitation robot. The healthy participants also simulated three types of compensatory motions. The 3-D trajectories of upper body joint positions tracked over time were used for multiclass classification of postures. A support vector machine (SVM) classifier detected lean-forward compensation from healthy participants with excellent accuracy (AUC = 0.98, F1 = 0.82), followed by trunk-rotation compensation (AUC = 0.77, F1 = 0.57). Shoulder-elevation compensation was not well detected (AUC = 0.66, F1 = 0.07). A recurrent neural network (RNN) classifier, which encodes the temporal dependency of video frames, obtained similar results. In contrast, F1-scores in stroke survivors were low for all three compensations while using RNN: lean-forward compensation (AUC = 0.77, F1 = 0.17), trunk-rotation compensation (AUC = 0.81, F1 = 0.27), and shoulder-elevation compensation (AUC = 0.27, F1 = 0.07). The result was similar while using SVM. To improve detection accuracy for stroke survivors, future work should focus on predefining the range of motion, direct camera placement, delivering exercise intensity tantamount to that of real stroke therapies, adjusting seat height, and recording full therapy sessions. IEEE 2017-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5788403/ /pubmed/29404226 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JTEHM.2017.2780836 Text en 2168-2372 © 2017 IEEE. Translations and content mining are permitted for academic research only. Personal use is also permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
spellingShingle Article
Automatic Detection of Compensation During Robotic Stroke Rehabilitation Therapy
title Automatic Detection of Compensation During Robotic Stroke Rehabilitation Therapy
title_full Automatic Detection of Compensation During Robotic Stroke Rehabilitation Therapy
title_fullStr Automatic Detection of Compensation During Robotic Stroke Rehabilitation Therapy
title_full_unstemmed Automatic Detection of Compensation During Robotic Stroke Rehabilitation Therapy
title_short Automatic Detection of Compensation During Robotic Stroke Rehabilitation Therapy
title_sort automatic detection of compensation during robotic stroke rehabilitation therapy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5788403/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29404226
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JTEHM.2017.2780836
work_keys_str_mv AT automaticdetectionofcompensationduringroboticstrokerehabilitationtherapy
AT automaticdetectionofcompensationduringroboticstrokerehabilitationtherapy
AT automaticdetectionofcompensationduringroboticstrokerehabilitationtherapy
AT automaticdetectionofcompensationduringroboticstrokerehabilitationtherapy
AT automaticdetectionofcompensationduringroboticstrokerehabilitationtherapy
AT automaticdetectionofcompensationduringroboticstrokerehabilitationtherapy