Cargando…

The pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling and cut-off values of tildipirosin against Haemophilus parasuis

The goal of this study was to establish the epidemiological, pharmacodynamic cut-off values, optimal dose regimens for tildipirosin against Haemophilus parasuis. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of 164 HPS isolates were determined and SH0165 whose MIC (2 μg/ml ) were selected for PD analy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lei, Zhixin, Liu, Qianying, Yang, Bing, Ahmed, Saeed, Cao, Jiyue, He, Qigai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5788590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29416722
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.23018
_version_ 1783296101162418176
author Lei, Zhixin
Liu, Qianying
Yang, Bing
Ahmed, Saeed
Cao, Jiyue
He, Qigai
author_facet Lei, Zhixin
Liu, Qianying
Yang, Bing
Ahmed, Saeed
Cao, Jiyue
He, Qigai
author_sort Lei, Zhixin
collection PubMed
description The goal of this study was to establish the epidemiological, pharmacodynamic cut-off values, optimal dose regimens for tildipirosin against Haemophilus parasuis. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of 164 HPS isolates were determined and SH0165 whose MIC (2 μg/ml ) were selected for PD analysis. The ex vivo MIC in plasma of SH0165 was 0.25 μg/ml which was 8 times lower than that in TSB. The bacteriostatic, bactericidal and elimination activity (AUC(24h)/MIC) in serum were 26.35, 52.27 and 73.29 h based on the inhibitory sigmoid E(max) modeling. The present study demonstrates that 97.9% of the wild-type (WT) isolates were covered when the epidemiological cut-off value (ECV) was set at 8 μg/ml. The parameters including AUC(24h), AUC, T1/2, C(max), CL(b) and MRT in PELF were 19.56, 60.41, 2.32, 4.02, 56.6, and 2.63 times than those in plasma, respectively. Regarding the Monte Carlo simulation, the CO(PD) was defined as 0.5 μg/ml in vitro, and the optimal doses to achieve bacteriostatic, bactericidal and elimination effect were 1.85, 3.67 and 5.16 mg/kg for 50% target, respectively, and 2.07, 4.17 and 5.78 mg/kg for 90% target, respectively. The results of this study offer a more optimised alternative for clinical use and demonstrated that 4.17 mg/kg of tildipirosin by intramuscular injection could have an effect on bactericidal activity against HPS. These values are of great significance for the effective treatment of HPS infections, but it also be deserved to be validated in clinical practice in the future research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5788590
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57885902018-02-07 The pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling and cut-off values of tildipirosin against Haemophilus parasuis Lei, Zhixin Liu, Qianying Yang, Bing Ahmed, Saeed Cao, Jiyue He, Qigai Oncotarget Research Paper The goal of this study was to establish the epidemiological, pharmacodynamic cut-off values, optimal dose regimens for tildipirosin against Haemophilus parasuis. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of 164 HPS isolates were determined and SH0165 whose MIC (2 μg/ml ) were selected for PD analysis. The ex vivo MIC in plasma of SH0165 was 0.25 μg/ml which was 8 times lower than that in TSB. The bacteriostatic, bactericidal and elimination activity (AUC(24h)/MIC) in serum were 26.35, 52.27 and 73.29 h based on the inhibitory sigmoid E(max) modeling. The present study demonstrates that 97.9% of the wild-type (WT) isolates were covered when the epidemiological cut-off value (ECV) was set at 8 μg/ml. The parameters including AUC(24h), AUC, T1/2, C(max), CL(b) and MRT in PELF were 19.56, 60.41, 2.32, 4.02, 56.6, and 2.63 times than those in plasma, respectively. Regarding the Monte Carlo simulation, the CO(PD) was defined as 0.5 μg/ml in vitro, and the optimal doses to achieve bacteriostatic, bactericidal and elimination effect were 1.85, 3.67 and 5.16 mg/kg for 50% target, respectively, and 2.07, 4.17 and 5.78 mg/kg for 90% target, respectively. The results of this study offer a more optimised alternative for clinical use and demonstrated that 4.17 mg/kg of tildipirosin by intramuscular injection could have an effect on bactericidal activity against HPS. These values are of great significance for the effective treatment of HPS infections, but it also be deserved to be validated in clinical practice in the future research. Impact Journals LLC 2017-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5788590/ /pubmed/29416722 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.23018 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Lei et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Lei, Zhixin
Liu, Qianying
Yang, Bing
Ahmed, Saeed
Cao, Jiyue
He, Qigai
The pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling and cut-off values of tildipirosin against Haemophilus parasuis
title The pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling and cut-off values of tildipirosin against Haemophilus parasuis
title_full The pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling and cut-off values of tildipirosin against Haemophilus parasuis
title_fullStr The pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling and cut-off values of tildipirosin against Haemophilus parasuis
title_full_unstemmed The pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling and cut-off values of tildipirosin against Haemophilus parasuis
title_short The pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling and cut-off values of tildipirosin against Haemophilus parasuis
title_sort pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling and cut-off values of tildipirosin against haemophilus parasuis
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5788590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29416722
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.23018
work_keys_str_mv AT leizhixin thepharmacokineticpharmacodynamicmodelingandcutoffvaluesoftildipirosinagainsthaemophilusparasuis
AT liuqianying thepharmacokineticpharmacodynamicmodelingandcutoffvaluesoftildipirosinagainsthaemophilusparasuis
AT yangbing thepharmacokineticpharmacodynamicmodelingandcutoffvaluesoftildipirosinagainsthaemophilusparasuis
AT ahmedsaeed thepharmacokineticpharmacodynamicmodelingandcutoffvaluesoftildipirosinagainsthaemophilusparasuis
AT caojiyue thepharmacokineticpharmacodynamicmodelingandcutoffvaluesoftildipirosinagainsthaemophilusparasuis
AT heqigai thepharmacokineticpharmacodynamicmodelingandcutoffvaluesoftildipirosinagainsthaemophilusparasuis
AT leizhixin pharmacokineticpharmacodynamicmodelingandcutoffvaluesoftildipirosinagainsthaemophilusparasuis
AT liuqianying pharmacokineticpharmacodynamicmodelingandcutoffvaluesoftildipirosinagainsthaemophilusparasuis
AT yangbing pharmacokineticpharmacodynamicmodelingandcutoffvaluesoftildipirosinagainsthaemophilusparasuis
AT ahmedsaeed pharmacokineticpharmacodynamicmodelingandcutoffvaluesoftildipirosinagainsthaemophilusparasuis
AT caojiyue pharmacokineticpharmacodynamicmodelingandcutoffvaluesoftildipirosinagainsthaemophilusparasuis
AT heqigai pharmacokineticpharmacodynamicmodelingandcutoffvaluesoftildipirosinagainsthaemophilusparasuis