Cargando…
Evaluation of predictive models for delayed graft function of deceased kidney transplantation
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the predictive power of five available delayed graft function (DGF)-prediction models for kidney transplants in the Chinese population. RESULTS: Among the five models, the Irish 2010 model scored the best in performance for the Chinese population. Irish 2010...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Impact Journals LLC
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5788595/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29416727 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.22711 |
_version_ | 1783296102351503360 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Huanxi Zheng, Linli Qin, Shuhang Liu, Longshan Yuan, Xiaopeng Fu, Qian Li, Jun Deng, Ronghai Deng, Suxiong Yu, Fangchao He, Xiaoshun Wang, Changxi |
author_facet | Zhang, Huanxi Zheng, Linli Qin, Shuhang Liu, Longshan Yuan, Xiaopeng Fu, Qian Li, Jun Deng, Ronghai Deng, Suxiong Yu, Fangchao He, Xiaoshun Wang, Changxi |
author_sort | Zhang, Huanxi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the predictive power of five available delayed graft function (DGF)-prediction models for kidney transplants in the Chinese population. RESULTS: Among the five models, the Irish 2010 model scored the best in performance for the Chinese population. Irish 2010 model had an area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.737. Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test showed that the Irish 2010 model had a strong correlation between the calculated DGF risk and the observed DGF incidence (p = 0.887). When Irish 2010 model was used in the clinic, the optimal upper cut-off was set to 0.5 with the best positive likelihood ratio, while the lower cut-off was set to 0.1 with the best negative likelihood ratio. In the subgroup of donor aged ≤ 5, the observed DGF incidence was significantly higher than the calculated DGF risk by Irish 2010 model (27% vs. 9%). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 711 renal transplant cases using deceased donors from China Donation after Citizen's Death Program at our center between February 2007 and August 2016 were included in the analysis using the five predictive models (Irish 2010, Irish 2003, Chaphal 2014, Zaza 2015, Jeldres 2009). CONCLUSIONS: Irish 2010 model has the best predictive power for DGF risk in Chinese population among the five models. However, it may not be suitable for allograft recipients whose donor aged ≤ 5-year-old. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5788595 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Impact Journals LLC |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57885952018-02-07 Evaluation of predictive models for delayed graft function of deceased kidney transplantation Zhang, Huanxi Zheng, Linli Qin, Shuhang Liu, Longshan Yuan, Xiaopeng Fu, Qian Li, Jun Deng, Ronghai Deng, Suxiong Yu, Fangchao He, Xiaoshun Wang, Changxi Oncotarget Research Paper BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the predictive power of five available delayed graft function (DGF)-prediction models for kidney transplants in the Chinese population. RESULTS: Among the five models, the Irish 2010 model scored the best in performance for the Chinese population. Irish 2010 model had an area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.737. Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test showed that the Irish 2010 model had a strong correlation between the calculated DGF risk and the observed DGF incidence (p = 0.887). When Irish 2010 model was used in the clinic, the optimal upper cut-off was set to 0.5 with the best positive likelihood ratio, while the lower cut-off was set to 0.1 with the best negative likelihood ratio. In the subgroup of donor aged ≤ 5, the observed DGF incidence was significantly higher than the calculated DGF risk by Irish 2010 model (27% vs. 9%). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 711 renal transplant cases using deceased donors from China Donation after Citizen's Death Program at our center between February 2007 and August 2016 were included in the analysis using the five predictive models (Irish 2010, Irish 2003, Chaphal 2014, Zaza 2015, Jeldres 2009). CONCLUSIONS: Irish 2010 model has the best predictive power for DGF risk in Chinese population among the five models. However, it may not be suitable for allograft recipients whose donor aged ≤ 5-year-old. Impact Journals LLC 2017-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5788595/ /pubmed/29416727 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.22711 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Zhang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Zhang, Huanxi Zheng, Linli Qin, Shuhang Liu, Longshan Yuan, Xiaopeng Fu, Qian Li, Jun Deng, Ronghai Deng, Suxiong Yu, Fangchao He, Xiaoshun Wang, Changxi Evaluation of predictive models for delayed graft function of deceased kidney transplantation |
title | Evaluation of predictive models for delayed graft function of deceased kidney transplantation |
title_full | Evaluation of predictive models for delayed graft function of deceased kidney transplantation |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of predictive models for delayed graft function of deceased kidney transplantation |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of predictive models for delayed graft function of deceased kidney transplantation |
title_short | Evaluation of predictive models for delayed graft function of deceased kidney transplantation |
title_sort | evaluation of predictive models for delayed graft function of deceased kidney transplantation |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5788595/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29416727 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.22711 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhanghuanxi evaluationofpredictivemodelsfordelayedgraftfunctionofdeceasedkidneytransplantation AT zhenglinli evaluationofpredictivemodelsfordelayedgraftfunctionofdeceasedkidneytransplantation AT qinshuhang evaluationofpredictivemodelsfordelayedgraftfunctionofdeceasedkidneytransplantation AT liulongshan evaluationofpredictivemodelsfordelayedgraftfunctionofdeceasedkidneytransplantation AT yuanxiaopeng evaluationofpredictivemodelsfordelayedgraftfunctionofdeceasedkidneytransplantation AT fuqian evaluationofpredictivemodelsfordelayedgraftfunctionofdeceasedkidneytransplantation AT lijun evaluationofpredictivemodelsfordelayedgraftfunctionofdeceasedkidneytransplantation AT dengronghai evaluationofpredictivemodelsfordelayedgraftfunctionofdeceasedkidneytransplantation AT dengsuxiong evaluationofpredictivemodelsfordelayedgraftfunctionofdeceasedkidneytransplantation AT yufangchao evaluationofpredictivemodelsfordelayedgraftfunctionofdeceasedkidneytransplantation AT hexiaoshun evaluationofpredictivemodelsfordelayedgraftfunctionofdeceasedkidneytransplantation AT wangchangxi evaluationofpredictivemodelsfordelayedgraftfunctionofdeceasedkidneytransplantation |