Cargando…

Evaluation of predictive models for delayed graft function of deceased kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the predictive power of five available delayed graft function (DGF)-prediction models for kidney transplants in the Chinese population. RESULTS: Among the five models, the Irish 2010 model scored the best in performance for the Chinese population. Irish 2010...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Huanxi, Zheng, Linli, Qin, Shuhang, Liu, Longshan, Yuan, Xiaopeng, Fu, Qian, Li, Jun, Deng, Ronghai, Deng, Suxiong, Yu, Fangchao, He, Xiaoshun, Wang, Changxi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5788595/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29416727
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.22711
_version_ 1783296102351503360
author Zhang, Huanxi
Zheng, Linli
Qin, Shuhang
Liu, Longshan
Yuan, Xiaopeng
Fu, Qian
Li, Jun
Deng, Ronghai
Deng, Suxiong
Yu, Fangchao
He, Xiaoshun
Wang, Changxi
author_facet Zhang, Huanxi
Zheng, Linli
Qin, Shuhang
Liu, Longshan
Yuan, Xiaopeng
Fu, Qian
Li, Jun
Deng, Ronghai
Deng, Suxiong
Yu, Fangchao
He, Xiaoshun
Wang, Changxi
author_sort Zhang, Huanxi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the predictive power of five available delayed graft function (DGF)-prediction models for kidney transplants in the Chinese population. RESULTS: Among the five models, the Irish 2010 model scored the best in performance for the Chinese population. Irish 2010 model had an area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.737. Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test showed that the Irish 2010 model had a strong correlation between the calculated DGF risk and the observed DGF incidence (p = 0.887). When Irish 2010 model was used in the clinic, the optimal upper cut-off was set to 0.5 with the best positive likelihood ratio, while the lower cut-off was set to 0.1 with the best negative likelihood ratio. In the subgroup of donor aged ≤ 5, the observed DGF incidence was significantly higher than the calculated DGF risk by Irish 2010 model (27% vs. 9%). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 711 renal transplant cases using deceased donors from China Donation after Citizen's Death Program at our center between February 2007 and August 2016 were included in the analysis using the five predictive models (Irish 2010, Irish 2003, Chaphal 2014, Zaza 2015, Jeldres 2009). CONCLUSIONS: Irish 2010 model has the best predictive power for DGF risk in Chinese population among the five models. However, it may not be suitable for allograft recipients whose donor aged ≤ 5-year-old.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5788595
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57885952018-02-07 Evaluation of predictive models for delayed graft function of deceased kidney transplantation Zhang, Huanxi Zheng, Linli Qin, Shuhang Liu, Longshan Yuan, Xiaopeng Fu, Qian Li, Jun Deng, Ronghai Deng, Suxiong Yu, Fangchao He, Xiaoshun Wang, Changxi Oncotarget Research Paper BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the predictive power of five available delayed graft function (DGF)-prediction models for kidney transplants in the Chinese population. RESULTS: Among the five models, the Irish 2010 model scored the best in performance for the Chinese population. Irish 2010 model had an area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.737. Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test showed that the Irish 2010 model had a strong correlation between the calculated DGF risk and the observed DGF incidence (p = 0.887). When Irish 2010 model was used in the clinic, the optimal upper cut-off was set to 0.5 with the best positive likelihood ratio, while the lower cut-off was set to 0.1 with the best negative likelihood ratio. In the subgroup of donor aged ≤ 5, the observed DGF incidence was significantly higher than the calculated DGF risk by Irish 2010 model (27% vs. 9%). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 711 renal transplant cases using deceased donors from China Donation after Citizen's Death Program at our center between February 2007 and August 2016 were included in the analysis using the five predictive models (Irish 2010, Irish 2003, Chaphal 2014, Zaza 2015, Jeldres 2009). CONCLUSIONS: Irish 2010 model has the best predictive power for DGF risk in Chinese population among the five models. However, it may not be suitable for allograft recipients whose donor aged ≤ 5-year-old. Impact Journals LLC 2017-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5788595/ /pubmed/29416727 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.22711 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Zhang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Zhang, Huanxi
Zheng, Linli
Qin, Shuhang
Liu, Longshan
Yuan, Xiaopeng
Fu, Qian
Li, Jun
Deng, Ronghai
Deng, Suxiong
Yu, Fangchao
He, Xiaoshun
Wang, Changxi
Evaluation of predictive models for delayed graft function of deceased kidney transplantation
title Evaluation of predictive models for delayed graft function of deceased kidney transplantation
title_full Evaluation of predictive models for delayed graft function of deceased kidney transplantation
title_fullStr Evaluation of predictive models for delayed graft function of deceased kidney transplantation
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of predictive models for delayed graft function of deceased kidney transplantation
title_short Evaluation of predictive models for delayed graft function of deceased kidney transplantation
title_sort evaluation of predictive models for delayed graft function of deceased kidney transplantation
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5788595/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29416727
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.22711
work_keys_str_mv AT zhanghuanxi evaluationofpredictivemodelsfordelayedgraftfunctionofdeceasedkidneytransplantation
AT zhenglinli evaluationofpredictivemodelsfordelayedgraftfunctionofdeceasedkidneytransplantation
AT qinshuhang evaluationofpredictivemodelsfordelayedgraftfunctionofdeceasedkidneytransplantation
AT liulongshan evaluationofpredictivemodelsfordelayedgraftfunctionofdeceasedkidneytransplantation
AT yuanxiaopeng evaluationofpredictivemodelsfordelayedgraftfunctionofdeceasedkidneytransplantation
AT fuqian evaluationofpredictivemodelsfordelayedgraftfunctionofdeceasedkidneytransplantation
AT lijun evaluationofpredictivemodelsfordelayedgraftfunctionofdeceasedkidneytransplantation
AT dengronghai evaluationofpredictivemodelsfordelayedgraftfunctionofdeceasedkidneytransplantation
AT dengsuxiong evaluationofpredictivemodelsfordelayedgraftfunctionofdeceasedkidneytransplantation
AT yufangchao evaluationofpredictivemodelsfordelayedgraftfunctionofdeceasedkidneytransplantation
AT hexiaoshun evaluationofpredictivemodelsfordelayedgraftfunctionofdeceasedkidneytransplantation
AT wangchangxi evaluationofpredictivemodelsfordelayedgraftfunctionofdeceasedkidneytransplantation