Cargando…

Prognostic impact of AnxA1 and AnxA2 gene expression in triple-negative breast cancer

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have shown Annexin A1 (AnxA1) and Annexin A2 (AnxA2) association with the aggressive behavior of Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC). Our aim was to determine the correlation of AnxA1 and AnxA2 with poor prognosis of TNBC patients. METHODS: We analyzed the gene expressio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gibbs, Lee D., Vishwanatha, Jamboor K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5788670/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29416802
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.23627
_version_ 1783296120628183040
author Gibbs, Lee D.
Vishwanatha, Jamboor K.
author_facet Gibbs, Lee D.
Vishwanatha, Jamboor K.
author_sort Gibbs, Lee D.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have shown Annexin A1 (AnxA1) and Annexin A2 (AnxA2) association with the aggressive behavior of Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC). Our aim was to determine the correlation of AnxA1 and AnxA2 with poor prognosis of TNBC patients. METHODS: We analyzed the gene expression of the human annexin family from microarray datasets and correlated with clinical outcomes to determine their ability to predict prognosis. RESULTS: Within a mean follow-up time of 57.2 months in our TNBC cohort, high AnxA1 expression was an independent indicator of poor overall survival (OS) [hazard ratio (HR), 2.14; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.22-3.78] and relapse-free survival (RFS) prognosis [HR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.28-2.17]. Additionally, high AnxA2 expression was an independent indicator of poor OS [HR, 2.66; 95% CI, 1.14-6.25], RFS [HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.12-1.89], RFS [HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.12-1.89), and distant metastasis free survival (DMFS) prognosis [HR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.16-1.95]. Analyses of TNBC patients with both high AnxA1 and AnxA2, demonstrates a significant decrease in OS (P=0.0017) and RFS (P=0.0002) when compared to the expression of genes independently. Furthermore, AnxA1 prognostic impact relies on high AnxA2 expression and both are preferential for TNBC when compared to other breast cancer subtypes. CONCLUSION: Together these findings indicate that AnxA1 and AnxA2 are preferential dual prognostic predictors among TNBC patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5788670
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57886702018-02-07 Prognostic impact of AnxA1 and AnxA2 gene expression in triple-negative breast cancer Gibbs, Lee D. Vishwanatha, Jamboor K. Oncotarget Research Paper OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have shown Annexin A1 (AnxA1) and Annexin A2 (AnxA2) association with the aggressive behavior of Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC). Our aim was to determine the correlation of AnxA1 and AnxA2 with poor prognosis of TNBC patients. METHODS: We analyzed the gene expression of the human annexin family from microarray datasets and correlated with clinical outcomes to determine their ability to predict prognosis. RESULTS: Within a mean follow-up time of 57.2 months in our TNBC cohort, high AnxA1 expression was an independent indicator of poor overall survival (OS) [hazard ratio (HR), 2.14; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.22-3.78] and relapse-free survival (RFS) prognosis [HR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.28-2.17]. Additionally, high AnxA2 expression was an independent indicator of poor OS [HR, 2.66; 95% CI, 1.14-6.25], RFS [HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.12-1.89], RFS [HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.12-1.89), and distant metastasis free survival (DMFS) prognosis [HR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.16-1.95]. Analyses of TNBC patients with both high AnxA1 and AnxA2, demonstrates a significant decrease in OS (P=0.0017) and RFS (P=0.0002) when compared to the expression of genes independently. Furthermore, AnxA1 prognostic impact relies on high AnxA2 expression and both are preferential for TNBC when compared to other breast cancer subtypes. CONCLUSION: Together these findings indicate that AnxA1 and AnxA2 are preferential dual prognostic predictors among TNBC patients. Impact Journals LLC 2017-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5788670/ /pubmed/29416802 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.23627 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Gibbs and Vishwanatha http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Gibbs, Lee D.
Vishwanatha, Jamboor K.
Prognostic impact of AnxA1 and AnxA2 gene expression in triple-negative breast cancer
title Prognostic impact of AnxA1 and AnxA2 gene expression in triple-negative breast cancer
title_full Prognostic impact of AnxA1 and AnxA2 gene expression in triple-negative breast cancer
title_fullStr Prognostic impact of AnxA1 and AnxA2 gene expression in triple-negative breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic impact of AnxA1 and AnxA2 gene expression in triple-negative breast cancer
title_short Prognostic impact of AnxA1 and AnxA2 gene expression in triple-negative breast cancer
title_sort prognostic impact of anxa1 and anxa2 gene expression in triple-negative breast cancer
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5788670/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29416802
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.23627
work_keys_str_mv AT gibbsleed prognosticimpactofanxa1andanxa2geneexpressionintriplenegativebreastcancer
AT vishwanathajamboork prognosticimpactofanxa1andanxa2geneexpressionintriplenegativebreastcancer