Cargando…

Human mate-choice copying is domain-general social learning

Women appear to copy other women’s preferences for men’s faces. This ‘mate-choice copying’ is often taken as evidence of psychological adaptations for processing social information related to mate choice, for which facial information is assumed to be particularly salient. No experiment, however, has...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Street, Sally E., Morgan, Thomas J. H., Thornton, Alex, Brown, Gillian R., Laland, Kevin N., Cross, Catharine P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5788917/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29379046
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19770-8
_version_ 1783296161395769344
author Street, Sally E.
Morgan, Thomas J. H.
Thornton, Alex
Brown, Gillian R.
Laland, Kevin N.
Cross, Catharine P.
author_facet Street, Sally E.
Morgan, Thomas J. H.
Thornton, Alex
Brown, Gillian R.
Laland, Kevin N.
Cross, Catharine P.
author_sort Street, Sally E.
collection PubMed
description Women appear to copy other women’s preferences for men’s faces. This ‘mate-choice copying’ is often taken as evidence of psychological adaptations for processing social information related to mate choice, for which facial information is assumed to be particularly salient. No experiment, however, has directly investigated whether women preferentially copy each other’s face preferences more than other preferences. Further, because prior experimental studies used artificial social information, the effect of real social information on attractiveness preferences is unknown. We collected attractiveness ratings of pictures of men’s faces, men’s hands, and abstract art given by heterosexual women, before and after they saw genuine social information gathered in real time from their peers. Ratings of faces were influenced by social information, but no more or less than were images of hands and abstract art. Our results suggest that evidence for domain-specific social learning mechanisms in humans is weaker than previously suggested.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5788917
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57889172018-02-08 Human mate-choice copying is domain-general social learning Street, Sally E. Morgan, Thomas J. H. Thornton, Alex Brown, Gillian R. Laland, Kevin N. Cross, Catharine P. Sci Rep Article Women appear to copy other women’s preferences for men’s faces. This ‘mate-choice copying’ is often taken as evidence of psychological adaptations for processing social information related to mate choice, for which facial information is assumed to be particularly salient. No experiment, however, has directly investigated whether women preferentially copy each other’s face preferences more than other preferences. Further, because prior experimental studies used artificial social information, the effect of real social information on attractiveness preferences is unknown. We collected attractiveness ratings of pictures of men’s faces, men’s hands, and abstract art given by heterosexual women, before and after they saw genuine social information gathered in real time from their peers. Ratings of faces were influenced by social information, but no more or less than were images of hands and abstract art. Our results suggest that evidence for domain-specific social learning mechanisms in humans is weaker than previously suggested. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5788917/ /pubmed/29379046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19770-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Street, Sally E.
Morgan, Thomas J. H.
Thornton, Alex
Brown, Gillian R.
Laland, Kevin N.
Cross, Catharine P.
Human mate-choice copying is domain-general social learning
title Human mate-choice copying is domain-general social learning
title_full Human mate-choice copying is domain-general social learning
title_fullStr Human mate-choice copying is domain-general social learning
title_full_unstemmed Human mate-choice copying is domain-general social learning
title_short Human mate-choice copying is domain-general social learning
title_sort human mate-choice copying is domain-general social learning
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5788917/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29379046
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19770-8
work_keys_str_mv AT streetsallye humanmatechoicecopyingisdomaingeneralsociallearning
AT morganthomasjh humanmatechoicecopyingisdomaingeneralsociallearning
AT thorntonalex humanmatechoicecopyingisdomaingeneralsociallearning
AT browngillianr humanmatechoicecopyingisdomaingeneralsociallearning
AT lalandkevinn humanmatechoicecopyingisdomaingeneralsociallearning
AT crosscatharinep humanmatechoicecopyingisdomaingeneralsociallearning