Cargando…

Using Longitudinal Assessment on Extensively Managed Ewes to Quantify Welfare Compromise and Risks

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Sheep managed extensively can be exposed to several welfare challenges during the year, and the risk of some diseases can increase in warmer and wetter seasons. In this study, the welfare of Merino ewes was examined over a calendar year. The welfare of these animals, kept on a single...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Munoz, Carolina, Campbell, Angus, Barber, Stuart, Hemsworth, Paul, Doyle, Rebecca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5789303/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29316704
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani8010008
_version_ 1783296245409775616
author Munoz, Carolina
Campbell, Angus
Barber, Stuart
Hemsworth, Paul
Doyle, Rebecca
author_facet Munoz, Carolina
Campbell, Angus
Barber, Stuart
Hemsworth, Paul
Doyle, Rebecca
author_sort Munoz, Carolina
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Sheep managed extensively can be exposed to several welfare challenges during the year, and the risk of some diseases can increase in warmer and wetter seasons. In this study, the welfare of Merino ewes was examined over a calendar year. The welfare of these animals, kept on a single farm with consistent management, varied substantially. Overall, the largest number of ewes experienced compromise and risk to welfare at weaning, indicating that this was the most vulnerable time. The main welfare issues identified were under and over feeding, ewe mortality, lameness, ecto-parasites (flystrike) and mastitis, all of which could be improved by modifying management practices, such as improved nutritional management and monitoring and better tail docking procedures. Future research must consider that significant variation in the on-farm welfare of ewes occurs during a calendar year, which needs to be accounted for when conducting on-farm assessments. ABSTRACT: This study examined variation in the welfare of extensively managed ewes and potential welfare risks. A total of 100 Merino ewes (aged 2–4 years) were individually identified and examined at three key stages: pregnancy, lactation and weaning. Eight animal-based welfare measures were used to assess welfare: flight distance, body condition score (BCS), fleece condition, skin lesions, tail length, dag score, lameness and mastitis. Data were analysed by ANOVA and McNemar’s statistics. Overall, the average BCS of the group was in agreement with industry recommendations. However, a number of animals were classified with inadequate condition (either too thin or too fat) across the three observation periods. The presence of heavy dags was greatest at mid-lactation (87%, P < 0.0001), lameness was greatest at weaning (14%, P = 0.01), clinical mastitis was 1% annually, and five ewes were lost from the study. Ewes had better health at mid-pregnancy compared to mid-lactation and weaning. The main welfare issues identified were under and over feeding, ewe mortality, lameness, ecto-parasites (flystrike) and mastitis, all of which have the potential to be reduced with improved management practices. Future welfare assessment programs must consider that significant variation in on-farm welfare will occur in extensively managed systems and this needs to be accounted for when evaluating farms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5789303
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57893032018-02-02 Using Longitudinal Assessment on Extensively Managed Ewes to Quantify Welfare Compromise and Risks Munoz, Carolina Campbell, Angus Barber, Stuart Hemsworth, Paul Doyle, Rebecca Animals (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Sheep managed extensively can be exposed to several welfare challenges during the year, and the risk of some diseases can increase in warmer and wetter seasons. In this study, the welfare of Merino ewes was examined over a calendar year. The welfare of these animals, kept on a single farm with consistent management, varied substantially. Overall, the largest number of ewes experienced compromise and risk to welfare at weaning, indicating that this was the most vulnerable time. The main welfare issues identified were under and over feeding, ewe mortality, lameness, ecto-parasites (flystrike) and mastitis, all of which could be improved by modifying management practices, such as improved nutritional management and monitoring and better tail docking procedures. Future research must consider that significant variation in the on-farm welfare of ewes occurs during a calendar year, which needs to be accounted for when conducting on-farm assessments. ABSTRACT: This study examined variation in the welfare of extensively managed ewes and potential welfare risks. A total of 100 Merino ewes (aged 2–4 years) were individually identified and examined at three key stages: pregnancy, lactation and weaning. Eight animal-based welfare measures were used to assess welfare: flight distance, body condition score (BCS), fleece condition, skin lesions, tail length, dag score, lameness and mastitis. Data were analysed by ANOVA and McNemar’s statistics. Overall, the average BCS of the group was in agreement with industry recommendations. However, a number of animals were classified with inadequate condition (either too thin or too fat) across the three observation periods. The presence of heavy dags was greatest at mid-lactation (87%, P < 0.0001), lameness was greatest at weaning (14%, P = 0.01), clinical mastitis was 1% annually, and five ewes were lost from the study. Ewes had better health at mid-pregnancy compared to mid-lactation and weaning. The main welfare issues identified were under and over feeding, ewe mortality, lameness, ecto-parasites (flystrike) and mastitis, all of which have the potential to be reduced with improved management practices. Future welfare assessment programs must consider that significant variation in on-farm welfare will occur in extensively managed systems and this needs to be accounted for when evaluating farms. MDPI 2018-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5789303/ /pubmed/29316704 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani8010008 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Munoz, Carolina
Campbell, Angus
Barber, Stuart
Hemsworth, Paul
Doyle, Rebecca
Using Longitudinal Assessment on Extensively Managed Ewes to Quantify Welfare Compromise and Risks
title Using Longitudinal Assessment on Extensively Managed Ewes to Quantify Welfare Compromise and Risks
title_full Using Longitudinal Assessment on Extensively Managed Ewes to Quantify Welfare Compromise and Risks
title_fullStr Using Longitudinal Assessment on Extensively Managed Ewes to Quantify Welfare Compromise and Risks
title_full_unstemmed Using Longitudinal Assessment on Extensively Managed Ewes to Quantify Welfare Compromise and Risks
title_short Using Longitudinal Assessment on Extensively Managed Ewes to Quantify Welfare Compromise and Risks
title_sort using longitudinal assessment on extensively managed ewes to quantify welfare compromise and risks
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5789303/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29316704
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani8010008
work_keys_str_mv AT munozcarolina usinglongitudinalassessmentonextensivelymanagedewestoquantifywelfarecompromiseandrisks
AT campbellangus usinglongitudinalassessmentonextensivelymanagedewestoquantifywelfarecompromiseandrisks
AT barberstuart usinglongitudinalassessmentonextensivelymanagedewestoquantifywelfarecompromiseandrisks
AT hemsworthpaul usinglongitudinalassessmentonextensivelymanagedewestoquantifywelfarecompromiseandrisks
AT doylerebecca usinglongitudinalassessmentonextensivelymanagedewestoquantifywelfarecompromiseandrisks