Cargando…

A randomized controlled trial comparing C Mac D Blade and Macintosh laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation in patients undergoing surgeries for head and neck cancer

PURPOSE: Several devices are available to take care of difficult airway, but C-MAC D-Blade has scant evidence of its use in nasotracheal intubation in a difficult airway scenario. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: We compared the C-MAC D-Blade videolaryngoscope(™), and the standard Macintosh laryngoscope for nas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hazarika, Hrishikesh, Saxena, Anudeep, Meshram, Pradeep, Kumar Bhargava, Ajay
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5789504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29416454
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sja.SJA_239_17
_version_ 1783296289384955904
author Hazarika, Hrishikesh
Saxena, Anudeep
Meshram, Pradeep
Kumar Bhargava, Ajay
author_facet Hazarika, Hrishikesh
Saxena, Anudeep
Meshram, Pradeep
Kumar Bhargava, Ajay
author_sort Hazarika, Hrishikesh
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Several devices are available to take care of difficult airway, but C-MAC D-Blade has scant evidence of its use in nasotracheal intubation in a difficult airway scenario. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: We compared the C-MAC D-Blade videolaryngoscope(™), and the standard Macintosh laryngoscope for nasal intubation in patients with difficult airways selected by El-Ganzouri risk index using parameters of time and attempts required for intubation, glottic view in terms of Cormack–Lehane grade, ease of intubation, success rate, use of accessory maneuvers, incidence of complications, and hemodynamic changes. METHODS: One hundred American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I–III patients aged 20–70 years with EGRI score 1–≤7 scheduled for head and neck surgery requiring nasal intubation. ASA IV patients, patients with mouth opening <2.5 cm, patients difficult to mask ventilate, and patients with hyperkalemia and history of malignant hyperthermia were excluded from the study. Primary outcome was time taken to intubation, and secondary outcomes were a number of attempts, glottic view in terms of C/L grade, use of accessory maneuvers, success rate, incidence of trauma, ease of intubation, and hemodynamic changes before and after intubation. RESULTS: Time required for intubation was less (39.56 ± 15.65 s) in Group C than in Group M (50.34 ± 15.65 s). Cormack–Lehane Grade I and II view were more in C-MAC D-Blade group (P < 0.05). Success rate and ease of intubation were found to be more in C-MAC D-Blade group than in Macintosh group (P < 0.05). A number of attempts and incidence of complications such as trauma, bleeding, and failed intubation were greater in Macintosh group than in C-MAC D-Blade group. Hemodynamic changes were observed to be comparable in both the groups. CONCLUSION: C-MAC D-Blade videolaryngoscope(™) is a better tool in anesthetic management of difficult airway for nasal intubation compared to conventional Macintosh laryngoscope.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5789504
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57895042018-02-07 A randomized controlled trial comparing C Mac D Blade and Macintosh laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation in patients undergoing surgeries for head and neck cancer Hazarika, Hrishikesh Saxena, Anudeep Meshram, Pradeep Kumar Bhargava, Ajay Saudi J Anaesth Original Article PURPOSE: Several devices are available to take care of difficult airway, but C-MAC D-Blade has scant evidence of its use in nasotracheal intubation in a difficult airway scenario. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: We compared the C-MAC D-Blade videolaryngoscope(™), and the standard Macintosh laryngoscope for nasal intubation in patients with difficult airways selected by El-Ganzouri risk index using parameters of time and attempts required for intubation, glottic view in terms of Cormack–Lehane grade, ease of intubation, success rate, use of accessory maneuvers, incidence of complications, and hemodynamic changes. METHODS: One hundred American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I–III patients aged 20–70 years with EGRI score 1–≤7 scheduled for head and neck surgery requiring nasal intubation. ASA IV patients, patients with mouth opening <2.5 cm, patients difficult to mask ventilate, and patients with hyperkalemia and history of malignant hyperthermia were excluded from the study. Primary outcome was time taken to intubation, and secondary outcomes were a number of attempts, glottic view in terms of C/L grade, use of accessory maneuvers, success rate, incidence of trauma, ease of intubation, and hemodynamic changes before and after intubation. RESULTS: Time required for intubation was less (39.56 ± 15.65 s) in Group C than in Group M (50.34 ± 15.65 s). Cormack–Lehane Grade I and II view were more in C-MAC D-Blade group (P < 0.05). Success rate and ease of intubation were found to be more in C-MAC D-Blade group than in Macintosh group (P < 0.05). A number of attempts and incidence of complications such as trauma, bleeding, and failed intubation were greater in Macintosh group than in C-MAC D-Blade group. Hemodynamic changes were observed to be comparable in both the groups. CONCLUSION: C-MAC D-Blade videolaryngoscope(™) is a better tool in anesthetic management of difficult airway for nasal intubation compared to conventional Macintosh laryngoscope. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5789504/ /pubmed/29416454 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sja.SJA_239_17 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3%.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Hazarika, Hrishikesh
Saxena, Anudeep
Meshram, Pradeep
Kumar Bhargava, Ajay
A randomized controlled trial comparing C Mac D Blade and Macintosh laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation in patients undergoing surgeries for head and neck cancer
title A randomized controlled trial comparing C Mac D Blade and Macintosh laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation in patients undergoing surgeries for head and neck cancer
title_full A randomized controlled trial comparing C Mac D Blade and Macintosh laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation in patients undergoing surgeries for head and neck cancer
title_fullStr A randomized controlled trial comparing C Mac D Blade and Macintosh laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation in patients undergoing surgeries for head and neck cancer
title_full_unstemmed A randomized controlled trial comparing C Mac D Blade and Macintosh laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation in patients undergoing surgeries for head and neck cancer
title_short A randomized controlled trial comparing C Mac D Blade and Macintosh laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation in patients undergoing surgeries for head and neck cancer
title_sort randomized controlled trial comparing c mac d blade and macintosh laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation in patients undergoing surgeries for head and neck cancer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5789504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29416454
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sja.SJA_239_17
work_keys_str_mv AT hazarikahrishikesh arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingcmacdbladeandmacintoshlaryngoscopefornasotrachealintubationinpatientsundergoingsurgeriesforheadandneckcancer
AT saxenaanudeep arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingcmacdbladeandmacintoshlaryngoscopefornasotrachealintubationinpatientsundergoingsurgeriesforheadandneckcancer
AT meshrampradeep arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingcmacdbladeandmacintoshlaryngoscopefornasotrachealintubationinpatientsundergoingsurgeriesforheadandneckcancer
AT kumarbhargavaajay arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingcmacdbladeandmacintoshlaryngoscopefornasotrachealintubationinpatientsundergoingsurgeriesforheadandneckcancer
AT hazarikahrishikesh randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingcmacdbladeandmacintoshlaryngoscopefornasotrachealintubationinpatientsundergoingsurgeriesforheadandneckcancer
AT saxenaanudeep randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingcmacdbladeandmacintoshlaryngoscopefornasotrachealintubationinpatientsundergoingsurgeriesforheadandneckcancer
AT meshrampradeep randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingcmacdbladeandmacintoshlaryngoscopefornasotrachealintubationinpatientsundergoingsurgeriesforheadandneckcancer
AT kumarbhargavaajay randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingcmacdbladeandmacintoshlaryngoscopefornasotrachealintubationinpatientsundergoingsurgeriesforheadandneckcancer