Cargando…

An Open Label Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Low Level Pressure Support and T-piece as Strategies for Discontinuation of Mechanical Ventilation in a General Surgical Intensive Care Unit

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of continuous low pressure support (PSV) and T-piece as strategies for discontinuation of mechanical ventilation and extubation in a surgical ICU. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective open label randomized control study in surg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chittawatanarat, Kaweesak, Orrapin, Sariphat, Jitkaroon, Karuna, Mueakwan, Sirirat, Sroison, Ubolrat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academy of Medical Sciences of Bosnia and Herzegovina 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5789559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29416219
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2018.72.51-57
_version_ 1783296302776320000
author Chittawatanarat, Kaweesak
Orrapin, Sariphat
Jitkaroon, Karuna
Mueakwan, Sirirat
Sroison, Ubolrat
author_facet Chittawatanarat, Kaweesak
Orrapin, Sariphat
Jitkaroon, Karuna
Mueakwan, Sirirat
Sroison, Ubolrat
author_sort Chittawatanarat, Kaweesak
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of continuous low pressure support (PSV) and T-piece as strategies for discontinuation of mechanical ventilation and extubation in a surgical ICU. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective open label randomized control study in surgical ICU patients who were intubated, mechanically ventilated, and who met criteria for a spontaneous breathing trial. Eligible, enrolled patients were randomized to receive low-level pressure supportup to 7 cmH2O (PSV) or T-piece as the mode of their spontaneous breathing trial. RESULTS: A total of 520 patients were randomized (260 in PSV group and 260 in T-piece group). There were no differences between the groups in baseline characteristics except duration of MV before trial was longer in PSV group. There were also no differences in hemodynamic and respiratory measures between groups. The PSV had a significant higher number of SBT attempt before success and extubation. After extubation, the re-intubation within 48 hours had a lower trend in PSV group (PSV vs. T-piece: 10% vs. 14.6%; p=0.11). The pneumonia occurrence, hospital mortality, hospital and ICU length of stay were not significant different between groups. In multivariable analysis, PSV was associated with a lower risk of success at the first SBT (adjusted relative risk, RR 0.79 [95% confidence interval, CI, 0.70 - 0.88]; p<0.001], and a lower risk of re-intubation within 48 hours after extubation (adjusted RR 0.62 [95%CI 0.40 - 0.98]; p=0.04). There were no differences between groups in pneumonia after extubation and in hospital mortality rate. CONCLUSION: Although PSV needs a higher number of SBT trial before success and extubation, the re-intubation within 48 hours is lower than T piece. However, there were no differences between the groups in term of pneumonia after extubation, hospital mortality as well as ICU and hospital length of stay.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5789559
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Academy of Medical Sciences of Bosnia and Herzegovina
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57895592018-02-08 An Open Label Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Low Level Pressure Support and T-piece as Strategies for Discontinuation of Mechanical Ventilation in a General Surgical Intensive Care Unit Chittawatanarat, Kaweesak Orrapin, Sariphat Jitkaroon, Karuna Mueakwan, Sirirat Sroison, Ubolrat Med Arch Original Paper OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of continuous low pressure support (PSV) and T-piece as strategies for discontinuation of mechanical ventilation and extubation in a surgical ICU. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective open label randomized control study in surgical ICU patients who were intubated, mechanically ventilated, and who met criteria for a spontaneous breathing trial. Eligible, enrolled patients were randomized to receive low-level pressure supportup to 7 cmH2O (PSV) or T-piece as the mode of their spontaneous breathing trial. RESULTS: A total of 520 patients were randomized (260 in PSV group and 260 in T-piece group). There were no differences between the groups in baseline characteristics except duration of MV before trial was longer in PSV group. There were also no differences in hemodynamic and respiratory measures between groups. The PSV had a significant higher number of SBT attempt before success and extubation. After extubation, the re-intubation within 48 hours had a lower trend in PSV group (PSV vs. T-piece: 10% vs. 14.6%; p=0.11). The pneumonia occurrence, hospital mortality, hospital and ICU length of stay were not significant different between groups. In multivariable analysis, PSV was associated with a lower risk of success at the first SBT (adjusted relative risk, RR 0.79 [95% confidence interval, CI, 0.70 - 0.88]; p<0.001], and a lower risk of re-intubation within 48 hours after extubation (adjusted RR 0.62 [95%CI 0.40 - 0.98]; p=0.04). There were no differences between groups in pneumonia after extubation and in hospital mortality rate. CONCLUSION: Although PSV needs a higher number of SBT trial before success and extubation, the re-intubation within 48 hours is lower than T piece. However, there were no differences between the groups in term of pneumonia after extubation, hospital mortality as well as ICU and hospital length of stay. Academy of Medical Sciences of Bosnia and Herzegovina 2018-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5789559/ /pubmed/29416219 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2018.72.51-57 Text en © 2018 Kaweesak Chittawatanarat, Sariphat Orrapin, Karuna Jitkaroon, Sirirat Mueakwan, Ubolrat Sroison http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Chittawatanarat, Kaweesak
Orrapin, Sariphat
Jitkaroon, Karuna
Mueakwan, Sirirat
Sroison, Ubolrat
An Open Label Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Low Level Pressure Support and T-piece as Strategies for Discontinuation of Mechanical Ventilation in a General Surgical Intensive Care Unit
title An Open Label Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Low Level Pressure Support and T-piece as Strategies for Discontinuation of Mechanical Ventilation in a General Surgical Intensive Care Unit
title_full An Open Label Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Low Level Pressure Support and T-piece as Strategies for Discontinuation of Mechanical Ventilation in a General Surgical Intensive Care Unit
title_fullStr An Open Label Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Low Level Pressure Support and T-piece as Strategies for Discontinuation of Mechanical Ventilation in a General Surgical Intensive Care Unit
title_full_unstemmed An Open Label Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Low Level Pressure Support and T-piece as Strategies for Discontinuation of Mechanical Ventilation in a General Surgical Intensive Care Unit
title_short An Open Label Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Low Level Pressure Support and T-piece as Strategies for Discontinuation of Mechanical Ventilation in a General Surgical Intensive Care Unit
title_sort open label randomized controlled trial to compare low level pressure support and t-piece as strategies for discontinuation of mechanical ventilation in a general surgical intensive care unit
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5789559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29416219
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2018.72.51-57
work_keys_str_mv AT chittawatanaratkaweesak anopenlabelrandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparelowlevelpressuresupportandtpieceasstrategiesfordiscontinuationofmechanicalventilationinageneralsurgicalintensivecareunit
AT orrapinsariphat anopenlabelrandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparelowlevelpressuresupportandtpieceasstrategiesfordiscontinuationofmechanicalventilationinageneralsurgicalintensivecareunit
AT jitkaroonkaruna anopenlabelrandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparelowlevelpressuresupportandtpieceasstrategiesfordiscontinuationofmechanicalventilationinageneralsurgicalintensivecareunit
AT mueakwansirirat anopenlabelrandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparelowlevelpressuresupportandtpieceasstrategiesfordiscontinuationofmechanicalventilationinageneralsurgicalintensivecareunit
AT sroisonubolrat anopenlabelrandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparelowlevelpressuresupportandtpieceasstrategiesfordiscontinuationofmechanicalventilationinageneralsurgicalintensivecareunit
AT chittawatanaratkaweesak openlabelrandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparelowlevelpressuresupportandtpieceasstrategiesfordiscontinuationofmechanicalventilationinageneralsurgicalintensivecareunit
AT orrapinsariphat openlabelrandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparelowlevelpressuresupportandtpieceasstrategiesfordiscontinuationofmechanicalventilationinageneralsurgicalintensivecareunit
AT jitkaroonkaruna openlabelrandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparelowlevelpressuresupportandtpieceasstrategiesfordiscontinuationofmechanicalventilationinageneralsurgicalintensivecareunit
AT mueakwansirirat openlabelrandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparelowlevelpressuresupportandtpieceasstrategiesfordiscontinuationofmechanicalventilationinageneralsurgicalintensivecareunit
AT sroisonubolrat openlabelrandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparelowlevelpressuresupportandtpieceasstrategiesfordiscontinuationofmechanicalventilationinageneralsurgicalintensivecareunit