Cargando…
An Open Label Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Low Level Pressure Support and T-piece as Strategies for Discontinuation of Mechanical Ventilation in a General Surgical Intensive Care Unit
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of continuous low pressure support (PSV) and T-piece as strategies for discontinuation of mechanical ventilation and extubation in a surgical ICU. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective open label randomized control study in surg...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Academy of Medical Sciences of Bosnia and Herzegovina
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5789559/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29416219 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2018.72.51-57 |
_version_ | 1783296302776320000 |
---|---|
author | Chittawatanarat, Kaweesak Orrapin, Sariphat Jitkaroon, Karuna Mueakwan, Sirirat Sroison, Ubolrat |
author_facet | Chittawatanarat, Kaweesak Orrapin, Sariphat Jitkaroon, Karuna Mueakwan, Sirirat Sroison, Ubolrat |
author_sort | Chittawatanarat, Kaweesak |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of continuous low pressure support (PSV) and T-piece as strategies for discontinuation of mechanical ventilation and extubation in a surgical ICU. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective open label randomized control study in surgical ICU patients who were intubated, mechanically ventilated, and who met criteria for a spontaneous breathing trial. Eligible, enrolled patients were randomized to receive low-level pressure supportup to 7 cmH2O (PSV) or T-piece as the mode of their spontaneous breathing trial. RESULTS: A total of 520 patients were randomized (260 in PSV group and 260 in T-piece group). There were no differences between the groups in baseline characteristics except duration of MV before trial was longer in PSV group. There were also no differences in hemodynamic and respiratory measures between groups. The PSV had a significant higher number of SBT attempt before success and extubation. After extubation, the re-intubation within 48 hours had a lower trend in PSV group (PSV vs. T-piece: 10% vs. 14.6%; p=0.11). The pneumonia occurrence, hospital mortality, hospital and ICU length of stay were not significant different between groups. In multivariable analysis, PSV was associated with a lower risk of success at the first SBT (adjusted relative risk, RR 0.79 [95% confidence interval, CI, 0.70 - 0.88]; p<0.001], and a lower risk of re-intubation within 48 hours after extubation (adjusted RR 0.62 [95%CI 0.40 - 0.98]; p=0.04). There were no differences between groups in pneumonia after extubation and in hospital mortality rate. CONCLUSION: Although PSV needs a higher number of SBT trial before success and extubation, the re-intubation within 48 hours is lower than T piece. However, there were no differences between the groups in term of pneumonia after extubation, hospital mortality as well as ICU and hospital length of stay. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5789559 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Academy of Medical Sciences of Bosnia and Herzegovina |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57895592018-02-08 An Open Label Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Low Level Pressure Support and T-piece as Strategies for Discontinuation of Mechanical Ventilation in a General Surgical Intensive Care Unit Chittawatanarat, Kaweesak Orrapin, Sariphat Jitkaroon, Karuna Mueakwan, Sirirat Sroison, Ubolrat Med Arch Original Paper OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of continuous low pressure support (PSV) and T-piece as strategies for discontinuation of mechanical ventilation and extubation in a surgical ICU. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective open label randomized control study in surgical ICU patients who were intubated, mechanically ventilated, and who met criteria for a spontaneous breathing trial. Eligible, enrolled patients were randomized to receive low-level pressure supportup to 7 cmH2O (PSV) or T-piece as the mode of their spontaneous breathing trial. RESULTS: A total of 520 patients were randomized (260 in PSV group and 260 in T-piece group). There were no differences between the groups in baseline characteristics except duration of MV before trial was longer in PSV group. There were also no differences in hemodynamic and respiratory measures between groups. The PSV had a significant higher number of SBT attempt before success and extubation. After extubation, the re-intubation within 48 hours had a lower trend in PSV group (PSV vs. T-piece: 10% vs. 14.6%; p=0.11). The pneumonia occurrence, hospital mortality, hospital and ICU length of stay were not significant different between groups. In multivariable analysis, PSV was associated with a lower risk of success at the first SBT (adjusted relative risk, RR 0.79 [95% confidence interval, CI, 0.70 - 0.88]; p<0.001], and a lower risk of re-intubation within 48 hours after extubation (adjusted RR 0.62 [95%CI 0.40 - 0.98]; p=0.04). There were no differences between groups in pneumonia after extubation and in hospital mortality rate. CONCLUSION: Although PSV needs a higher number of SBT trial before success and extubation, the re-intubation within 48 hours is lower than T piece. However, there were no differences between the groups in term of pneumonia after extubation, hospital mortality as well as ICU and hospital length of stay. Academy of Medical Sciences of Bosnia and Herzegovina 2018-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5789559/ /pubmed/29416219 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2018.72.51-57 Text en © 2018 Kaweesak Chittawatanarat, Sariphat Orrapin, Karuna Jitkaroon, Sirirat Mueakwan, Ubolrat Sroison http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Chittawatanarat, Kaweesak Orrapin, Sariphat Jitkaroon, Karuna Mueakwan, Sirirat Sroison, Ubolrat An Open Label Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Low Level Pressure Support and T-piece as Strategies for Discontinuation of Mechanical Ventilation in a General Surgical Intensive Care Unit |
title | An Open Label Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Low Level Pressure Support and T-piece as Strategies for Discontinuation of Mechanical Ventilation in a General Surgical Intensive Care Unit |
title_full | An Open Label Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Low Level Pressure Support and T-piece as Strategies for Discontinuation of Mechanical Ventilation in a General Surgical Intensive Care Unit |
title_fullStr | An Open Label Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Low Level Pressure Support and T-piece as Strategies for Discontinuation of Mechanical Ventilation in a General Surgical Intensive Care Unit |
title_full_unstemmed | An Open Label Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Low Level Pressure Support and T-piece as Strategies for Discontinuation of Mechanical Ventilation in a General Surgical Intensive Care Unit |
title_short | An Open Label Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Low Level Pressure Support and T-piece as Strategies for Discontinuation of Mechanical Ventilation in a General Surgical Intensive Care Unit |
title_sort | open label randomized controlled trial to compare low level pressure support and t-piece as strategies for discontinuation of mechanical ventilation in a general surgical intensive care unit |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5789559/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29416219 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2018.72.51-57 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chittawatanaratkaweesak anopenlabelrandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparelowlevelpressuresupportandtpieceasstrategiesfordiscontinuationofmechanicalventilationinageneralsurgicalintensivecareunit AT orrapinsariphat anopenlabelrandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparelowlevelpressuresupportandtpieceasstrategiesfordiscontinuationofmechanicalventilationinageneralsurgicalintensivecareunit AT jitkaroonkaruna anopenlabelrandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparelowlevelpressuresupportandtpieceasstrategiesfordiscontinuationofmechanicalventilationinageneralsurgicalintensivecareunit AT mueakwansirirat anopenlabelrandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparelowlevelpressuresupportandtpieceasstrategiesfordiscontinuationofmechanicalventilationinageneralsurgicalintensivecareunit AT sroisonubolrat anopenlabelrandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparelowlevelpressuresupportandtpieceasstrategiesfordiscontinuationofmechanicalventilationinageneralsurgicalintensivecareunit AT chittawatanaratkaweesak openlabelrandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparelowlevelpressuresupportandtpieceasstrategiesfordiscontinuationofmechanicalventilationinageneralsurgicalintensivecareunit AT orrapinsariphat openlabelrandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparelowlevelpressuresupportandtpieceasstrategiesfordiscontinuationofmechanicalventilationinageneralsurgicalintensivecareunit AT jitkaroonkaruna openlabelrandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparelowlevelpressuresupportandtpieceasstrategiesfordiscontinuationofmechanicalventilationinageneralsurgicalintensivecareunit AT mueakwansirirat openlabelrandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparelowlevelpressuresupportandtpieceasstrategiesfordiscontinuationofmechanicalventilationinageneralsurgicalintensivecareunit AT sroisonubolrat openlabelrandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparelowlevelpressuresupportandtpieceasstrategiesfordiscontinuationofmechanicalventilationinageneralsurgicalintensivecareunit |