Cargando…
New anthropometric indices or old ones: which perform better in estimating cardiovascular risks in Chinese adults
BACKGROUND: Various anthropometric indices can be used to estimate obesity, and it is important to determine which one is the best in predicting the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) and to define the optimal cut-off point for the best index. METHODS: This cross-sectional study investigated a con...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5789564/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29378513 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-018-0754-z |
_version_ | 1783296304117448704 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Fei Chen, Yintao Chang, Ye Sun, Guozhe Sun, Yingxian |
author_facet | Wang, Fei Chen, Yintao Chang, Ye Sun, Guozhe Sun, Yingxian |
author_sort | Wang, Fei |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Various anthropometric indices can be used to estimate obesity, and it is important to determine which one is the best in predicting the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) and to define the optimal cut-off point for the best index. METHODS: This cross-sectional study investigated a consecutive sample of 11,247 adults, who had lived in rural areas of China and were older than 35 years of age. Eight obesity indices, including the body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), waist-to-height ratio (WHtR), abdominal volume index (AVI), body adiposity index (BAI), body roundness index (BRI) and a body shape index (ABSI) were investigated. The risk of CHD was evaluated by the 10-year coronary event risk (Framingham risk score). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were used to evaluate the predictive ability of the obesity indices for CHD risk. RESULTS: Of the whole population, 3636 (32.32%) participants had a risk score higher than 10%. Those who suffered medium or high CHD risk were more likely to have higher mean anthropometric indices, except for BMI in males. In the multivariate-adjusted logistic regression, all these anthropometric measurements were statistically associated with CHD risk in males. After adjusting for all the possible confounders, these anthropometric measurements, except for ABSI, remained as independent indicators of CHD risk in females. According to the ROC analyses, ABSI provided the largest area under the curve (AUC) value in males, and BMI showed the lowest AUC value, with AUC varying from 0.52 to 0.60. WHtR and BRI provided the largest AUC value in female, and similarly, BMI showed the lowest AUC value, with AUC varying from 0.59 to 0.70. The optimal cut-off values were as follows: WHtR (females: 0.54), BRI (females: 4.21), and ABSI (males: 0.078). CONCLUSIONS: ABSI was the best anthropometric index for estimating CHD risk in males, and WHtR and BRI were the best indicators in females. Males should maintain an ABSI of less than 0.078, and females should maintain a WHtR of less than 0.54 or a BRI of less than 4.21. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12872-018-0754-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5789564 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57895642018-02-08 New anthropometric indices or old ones: which perform better in estimating cardiovascular risks in Chinese adults Wang, Fei Chen, Yintao Chang, Ye Sun, Guozhe Sun, Yingxian BMC Cardiovasc Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Various anthropometric indices can be used to estimate obesity, and it is important to determine which one is the best in predicting the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) and to define the optimal cut-off point for the best index. METHODS: This cross-sectional study investigated a consecutive sample of 11,247 adults, who had lived in rural areas of China and were older than 35 years of age. Eight obesity indices, including the body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), waist-to-height ratio (WHtR), abdominal volume index (AVI), body adiposity index (BAI), body roundness index (BRI) and a body shape index (ABSI) were investigated. The risk of CHD was evaluated by the 10-year coronary event risk (Framingham risk score). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were used to evaluate the predictive ability of the obesity indices for CHD risk. RESULTS: Of the whole population, 3636 (32.32%) participants had a risk score higher than 10%. Those who suffered medium or high CHD risk were more likely to have higher mean anthropometric indices, except for BMI in males. In the multivariate-adjusted logistic regression, all these anthropometric measurements were statistically associated with CHD risk in males. After adjusting for all the possible confounders, these anthropometric measurements, except for ABSI, remained as independent indicators of CHD risk in females. According to the ROC analyses, ABSI provided the largest area under the curve (AUC) value in males, and BMI showed the lowest AUC value, with AUC varying from 0.52 to 0.60. WHtR and BRI provided the largest AUC value in female, and similarly, BMI showed the lowest AUC value, with AUC varying from 0.59 to 0.70. The optimal cut-off values were as follows: WHtR (females: 0.54), BRI (females: 4.21), and ABSI (males: 0.078). CONCLUSIONS: ABSI was the best anthropometric index for estimating CHD risk in males, and WHtR and BRI were the best indicators in females. Males should maintain an ABSI of less than 0.078, and females should maintain a WHtR of less than 0.54 or a BRI of less than 4.21. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12872-018-0754-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5789564/ /pubmed/29378513 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-018-0754-z Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wang, Fei Chen, Yintao Chang, Ye Sun, Guozhe Sun, Yingxian New anthropometric indices or old ones: which perform better in estimating cardiovascular risks in Chinese adults |
title | New anthropometric indices or old ones: which perform better in estimating cardiovascular risks in Chinese adults |
title_full | New anthropometric indices or old ones: which perform better in estimating cardiovascular risks in Chinese adults |
title_fullStr | New anthropometric indices or old ones: which perform better in estimating cardiovascular risks in Chinese adults |
title_full_unstemmed | New anthropometric indices or old ones: which perform better in estimating cardiovascular risks in Chinese adults |
title_short | New anthropometric indices or old ones: which perform better in estimating cardiovascular risks in Chinese adults |
title_sort | new anthropometric indices or old ones: which perform better in estimating cardiovascular risks in chinese adults |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5789564/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29378513 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-018-0754-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangfei newanthropometricindicesoroldoneswhichperformbetterinestimatingcardiovascularrisksinchineseadults AT chenyintao newanthropometricindicesoroldoneswhichperformbetterinestimatingcardiovascularrisksinchineseadults AT changye newanthropometricindicesoroldoneswhichperformbetterinestimatingcardiovascularrisksinchineseadults AT sunguozhe newanthropometricindicesoroldoneswhichperformbetterinestimatingcardiovascularrisksinchineseadults AT sunyingxian newanthropometricindicesoroldoneswhichperformbetterinestimatingcardiovascularrisksinchineseadults |