Cargando…
‘Recruitment, recruitment, recruitment’ – the need for more focus on retention: a qualitative study of five trials
BACKGROUND: Loss to follow-up (attrition) is a frequent problem in clinical trials and can introduce bias or reduce power. So, understanding retention issues and strategies to address these are important. As part of a multi-method project, this qualitative study aimed to explore retention strategies...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5789584/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29378618 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2467-0 |
_version_ | 1783296308850720768 |
---|---|
author | Daykin, Anne Clement, Clare Gamble, Carrol Kearney, Anna Blazeby, Jane Clarke, Mike Lane, J. Athene Shaw, Alison |
author_facet | Daykin, Anne Clement, Clare Gamble, Carrol Kearney, Anna Blazeby, Jane Clarke, Mike Lane, J. Athene Shaw, Alison |
author_sort | Daykin, Anne |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Loss to follow-up (attrition) is a frequent problem in clinical trials and can introduce bias or reduce power. So, understanding retention issues and strategies to address these are important. As part of a multi-method project, this qualitative study aimed to explore retention strategies used by trial teams and factors which may influence strategy adoption. METHOD: A purposive sample of active trials was selected from the UK NIHR HTA portfolio of ongoing trials in 2014/2015. Semi-structured interviews with several trial team members from each trial and supplementary interviews with experienced trial managers explored strategies in collecting clinical outcome data and retaining participants. Interview data were analysed thematically using techniques of constant comparison. RESULTS: Twenty-two semi-structured interviews with trial team members including chief investigators, trial managers, nurses and research administrators revealed strategies used to enhance retention. Some were recognised methods and planned from trial outset whilst others were implemented more responsively. Interviewees placed great value on fostering positive relationships with trial participants to enhance retention. However, these strategies took time which was not always appreciated by the wider trial team or funding bodies. The national focus on recruitment targets in networks posed a challenge to staff and was deemed detrimental to retention. The ‘moral compass’ of individual researchers relied on their own beliefs and values and research experience and the factors affected their confidence to pursue participant data during follow-up. CONCLUSION: The role of trial staff and their underlying behaviours influence retention practices and, combined with emphasis on recruitment targets, can be detrimental to motivation and retention activities. There is a need to consider how to train and support trial staff involved in retention practices and recognition of retention from funding bodies and oversight organisations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5789584 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57895842018-02-08 ‘Recruitment, recruitment, recruitment’ – the need for more focus on retention: a qualitative study of five trials Daykin, Anne Clement, Clare Gamble, Carrol Kearney, Anna Blazeby, Jane Clarke, Mike Lane, J. Athene Shaw, Alison Trials Research BACKGROUND: Loss to follow-up (attrition) is a frequent problem in clinical trials and can introduce bias or reduce power. So, understanding retention issues and strategies to address these are important. As part of a multi-method project, this qualitative study aimed to explore retention strategies used by trial teams and factors which may influence strategy adoption. METHOD: A purposive sample of active trials was selected from the UK NIHR HTA portfolio of ongoing trials in 2014/2015. Semi-structured interviews with several trial team members from each trial and supplementary interviews with experienced trial managers explored strategies in collecting clinical outcome data and retaining participants. Interview data were analysed thematically using techniques of constant comparison. RESULTS: Twenty-two semi-structured interviews with trial team members including chief investigators, trial managers, nurses and research administrators revealed strategies used to enhance retention. Some were recognised methods and planned from trial outset whilst others were implemented more responsively. Interviewees placed great value on fostering positive relationships with trial participants to enhance retention. However, these strategies took time which was not always appreciated by the wider trial team or funding bodies. The national focus on recruitment targets in networks posed a challenge to staff and was deemed detrimental to retention. The ‘moral compass’ of individual researchers relied on their own beliefs and values and research experience and the factors affected their confidence to pursue participant data during follow-up. CONCLUSION: The role of trial staff and their underlying behaviours influence retention practices and, combined with emphasis on recruitment targets, can be detrimental to motivation and retention activities. There is a need to consider how to train and support trial staff involved in retention practices and recognition of retention from funding bodies and oversight organisations. BioMed Central 2018-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5789584/ /pubmed/29378618 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2467-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Daykin, Anne Clement, Clare Gamble, Carrol Kearney, Anna Blazeby, Jane Clarke, Mike Lane, J. Athene Shaw, Alison ‘Recruitment, recruitment, recruitment’ – the need for more focus on retention: a qualitative study of five trials |
title | ‘Recruitment, recruitment, recruitment’ – the need for more focus on retention: a qualitative study of five trials |
title_full | ‘Recruitment, recruitment, recruitment’ – the need for more focus on retention: a qualitative study of five trials |
title_fullStr | ‘Recruitment, recruitment, recruitment’ – the need for more focus on retention: a qualitative study of five trials |
title_full_unstemmed | ‘Recruitment, recruitment, recruitment’ – the need for more focus on retention: a qualitative study of five trials |
title_short | ‘Recruitment, recruitment, recruitment’ – the need for more focus on retention: a qualitative study of five trials |
title_sort | ‘recruitment, recruitment, recruitment’ – the need for more focus on retention: a qualitative study of five trials |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5789584/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29378618 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2467-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT daykinanne recruitmentrecruitmentrecruitmenttheneedformorefocusonretentionaqualitativestudyoffivetrials AT clementclare recruitmentrecruitmentrecruitmenttheneedformorefocusonretentionaqualitativestudyoffivetrials AT gamblecarrol recruitmentrecruitmentrecruitmenttheneedformorefocusonretentionaqualitativestudyoffivetrials AT kearneyanna recruitmentrecruitmentrecruitmenttheneedformorefocusonretentionaqualitativestudyoffivetrials AT blazebyjane recruitmentrecruitmentrecruitmenttheneedformorefocusonretentionaqualitativestudyoffivetrials AT clarkemike recruitmentrecruitmentrecruitmenttheneedformorefocusonretentionaqualitativestudyoffivetrials AT lanejathene recruitmentrecruitmentrecruitmenttheneedformorefocusonretentionaqualitativestudyoffivetrials AT shawalison recruitmentrecruitmentrecruitmenttheneedformorefocusonretentionaqualitativestudyoffivetrials |