Cargando…

‘Recruitment, recruitment, recruitment’ – the need for more focus on retention: a qualitative study of five trials

BACKGROUND: Loss to follow-up (attrition) is a frequent problem in clinical trials and can introduce bias or reduce power. So, understanding retention issues and strategies to address these are important. As part of a multi-method project, this qualitative study aimed to explore retention strategies...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Daykin, Anne, Clement, Clare, Gamble, Carrol, Kearney, Anna, Blazeby, Jane, Clarke, Mike, Lane, J. Athene, Shaw, Alison
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5789584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29378618
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2467-0
_version_ 1783296308850720768
author Daykin, Anne
Clement, Clare
Gamble, Carrol
Kearney, Anna
Blazeby, Jane
Clarke, Mike
Lane, J. Athene
Shaw, Alison
author_facet Daykin, Anne
Clement, Clare
Gamble, Carrol
Kearney, Anna
Blazeby, Jane
Clarke, Mike
Lane, J. Athene
Shaw, Alison
author_sort Daykin, Anne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Loss to follow-up (attrition) is a frequent problem in clinical trials and can introduce bias or reduce power. So, understanding retention issues and strategies to address these are important. As part of a multi-method project, this qualitative study aimed to explore retention strategies used by trial teams and factors which may influence strategy adoption. METHOD: A purposive sample of active trials was selected from the UK NIHR HTA portfolio of ongoing trials in 2014/2015. Semi-structured interviews with several trial team members from each trial and supplementary interviews with experienced trial managers explored strategies in collecting clinical outcome data and retaining participants. Interview data were analysed thematically using techniques of constant comparison. RESULTS: Twenty-two semi-structured interviews with trial team members including chief investigators, trial managers, nurses and research administrators revealed strategies used to enhance retention. Some were recognised methods and planned from trial outset whilst others were implemented more responsively. Interviewees placed great value on fostering positive relationships with trial participants to enhance retention. However, these strategies took time which was not always appreciated by the wider trial team or funding bodies. The national focus on recruitment targets in networks posed a challenge to staff and was deemed detrimental to retention. The ‘moral compass’ of individual researchers relied on their own beliefs and values and research experience and the factors affected their confidence to pursue participant data during follow-up. CONCLUSION: The role of trial staff and their underlying behaviours influence retention practices and, combined with emphasis on recruitment targets, can be detrimental to motivation and retention activities. There is a need to consider how to train and support trial staff involved in retention practices and recognition of retention from funding bodies and oversight organisations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5789584
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57895842018-02-08 ‘Recruitment, recruitment, recruitment’ – the need for more focus on retention: a qualitative study of five trials Daykin, Anne Clement, Clare Gamble, Carrol Kearney, Anna Blazeby, Jane Clarke, Mike Lane, J. Athene Shaw, Alison Trials Research BACKGROUND: Loss to follow-up (attrition) is a frequent problem in clinical trials and can introduce bias or reduce power. So, understanding retention issues and strategies to address these are important. As part of a multi-method project, this qualitative study aimed to explore retention strategies used by trial teams and factors which may influence strategy adoption. METHOD: A purposive sample of active trials was selected from the UK NIHR HTA portfolio of ongoing trials in 2014/2015. Semi-structured interviews with several trial team members from each trial and supplementary interviews with experienced trial managers explored strategies in collecting clinical outcome data and retaining participants. Interview data were analysed thematically using techniques of constant comparison. RESULTS: Twenty-two semi-structured interviews with trial team members including chief investigators, trial managers, nurses and research administrators revealed strategies used to enhance retention. Some were recognised methods and planned from trial outset whilst others were implemented more responsively. Interviewees placed great value on fostering positive relationships with trial participants to enhance retention. However, these strategies took time which was not always appreciated by the wider trial team or funding bodies. The national focus on recruitment targets in networks posed a challenge to staff and was deemed detrimental to retention. The ‘moral compass’ of individual researchers relied on their own beliefs and values and research experience and the factors affected their confidence to pursue participant data during follow-up. CONCLUSION: The role of trial staff and their underlying behaviours influence retention practices and, combined with emphasis on recruitment targets, can be detrimental to motivation and retention activities. There is a need to consider how to train and support trial staff involved in retention practices and recognition of retention from funding bodies and oversight organisations. BioMed Central 2018-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5789584/ /pubmed/29378618 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2467-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Daykin, Anne
Clement, Clare
Gamble, Carrol
Kearney, Anna
Blazeby, Jane
Clarke, Mike
Lane, J. Athene
Shaw, Alison
‘Recruitment, recruitment, recruitment’ – the need for more focus on retention: a qualitative study of five trials
title ‘Recruitment, recruitment, recruitment’ – the need for more focus on retention: a qualitative study of five trials
title_full ‘Recruitment, recruitment, recruitment’ – the need for more focus on retention: a qualitative study of five trials
title_fullStr ‘Recruitment, recruitment, recruitment’ – the need for more focus on retention: a qualitative study of five trials
title_full_unstemmed ‘Recruitment, recruitment, recruitment’ – the need for more focus on retention: a qualitative study of five trials
title_short ‘Recruitment, recruitment, recruitment’ – the need for more focus on retention: a qualitative study of five trials
title_sort ‘recruitment, recruitment, recruitment’ – the need for more focus on retention: a qualitative study of five trials
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5789584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29378618
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2467-0
work_keys_str_mv AT daykinanne recruitmentrecruitmentrecruitmenttheneedformorefocusonretentionaqualitativestudyoffivetrials
AT clementclare recruitmentrecruitmentrecruitmenttheneedformorefocusonretentionaqualitativestudyoffivetrials
AT gamblecarrol recruitmentrecruitmentrecruitmenttheneedformorefocusonretentionaqualitativestudyoffivetrials
AT kearneyanna recruitmentrecruitmentrecruitmenttheneedformorefocusonretentionaqualitativestudyoffivetrials
AT blazebyjane recruitmentrecruitmentrecruitmenttheneedformorefocusonretentionaqualitativestudyoffivetrials
AT clarkemike recruitmentrecruitmentrecruitmenttheneedformorefocusonretentionaqualitativestudyoffivetrials
AT lanejathene recruitmentrecruitmentrecruitmenttheneedformorefocusonretentionaqualitativestudyoffivetrials
AT shawalison recruitmentrecruitmentrecruitmenttheneedformorefocusonretentionaqualitativestudyoffivetrials