Cargando…

Evaluation of the tumor movement and the reproducibility of two different immobilization setups for image-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver tumors

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the tumor movement and accuracy of patient immobilization in stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver tumors with low pressure foil or abdominal compression. METHODS: Fifty-four liver tumors treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy were included...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dreher, Constantin, Oechsner, Markus, Mayinger, Michael, Beierl, Stefanie, Duma, Marciana-Nona, Combs, Stephanie E., Habermehl, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5789593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29378624
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-0962-9
_version_ 1783296311068459008
author Dreher, Constantin
Oechsner, Markus
Mayinger, Michael
Beierl, Stefanie
Duma, Marciana-Nona
Combs, Stephanie E.
Habermehl, Daniel
author_facet Dreher, Constantin
Oechsner, Markus
Mayinger, Michael
Beierl, Stefanie
Duma, Marciana-Nona
Combs, Stephanie E.
Habermehl, Daniel
author_sort Dreher, Constantin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the tumor movement and accuracy of patient immobilization in stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver tumors with low pressure foil or abdominal compression. METHODS: Fifty-four liver tumors treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy were included in this study. Forty patients were immobilized by a vacuum couch with low pressure foil, 14 patients by abdominal compression. We evaluated the ratio of gross tumor volume/internal target volume, the tumor movement in 4D-computed tomography scans and daily online adjustments after cone beam computed tomography scans. RESULTS: The ratio of gross tumor volume/internal target volume was smaller with low pressure foil. The tumor movement in 4D-computed tomography scans was smaller with abdominal compression, the cranial movement even significantly different (p = 0.02). The mean online adjustments and their mean absolute values in the vertical, lateral and longitudinal axis were smaller with abdominal compression. The online adjustments were significantly different (p < 0.013), their absolute values in case of the longitudinal axis (p = 0.043). There was no significant difference of the adjustments’ 3D vectors. CONCLUSIONS: In comparison to low pressure foil, abdominal compression leads to a reduction of the tumor movement. Online adjustments decreased significantly, thus leading to higher accuracy in patient positioning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5789593
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57895932018-02-08 Evaluation of the tumor movement and the reproducibility of two different immobilization setups for image-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver tumors Dreher, Constantin Oechsner, Markus Mayinger, Michael Beierl, Stefanie Duma, Marciana-Nona Combs, Stephanie E. Habermehl, Daniel Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the tumor movement and accuracy of patient immobilization in stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver tumors with low pressure foil or abdominal compression. METHODS: Fifty-four liver tumors treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy were included in this study. Forty patients were immobilized by a vacuum couch with low pressure foil, 14 patients by abdominal compression. We evaluated the ratio of gross tumor volume/internal target volume, the tumor movement in 4D-computed tomography scans and daily online adjustments after cone beam computed tomography scans. RESULTS: The ratio of gross tumor volume/internal target volume was smaller with low pressure foil. The tumor movement in 4D-computed tomography scans was smaller with abdominal compression, the cranial movement even significantly different (p = 0.02). The mean online adjustments and their mean absolute values in the vertical, lateral and longitudinal axis were smaller with abdominal compression. The online adjustments were significantly different (p < 0.013), their absolute values in case of the longitudinal axis (p = 0.043). There was no significant difference of the adjustments’ 3D vectors. CONCLUSIONS: In comparison to low pressure foil, abdominal compression leads to a reduction of the tumor movement. Online adjustments decreased significantly, thus leading to higher accuracy in patient positioning. BioMed Central 2018-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5789593/ /pubmed/29378624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-0962-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Dreher, Constantin
Oechsner, Markus
Mayinger, Michael
Beierl, Stefanie
Duma, Marciana-Nona
Combs, Stephanie E.
Habermehl, Daniel
Evaluation of the tumor movement and the reproducibility of two different immobilization setups for image-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver tumors
title Evaluation of the tumor movement and the reproducibility of two different immobilization setups for image-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver tumors
title_full Evaluation of the tumor movement and the reproducibility of two different immobilization setups for image-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver tumors
title_fullStr Evaluation of the tumor movement and the reproducibility of two different immobilization setups for image-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver tumors
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the tumor movement and the reproducibility of two different immobilization setups for image-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver tumors
title_short Evaluation of the tumor movement and the reproducibility of two different immobilization setups for image-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver tumors
title_sort evaluation of the tumor movement and the reproducibility of two different immobilization setups for image-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver tumors
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5789593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29378624
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-0962-9
work_keys_str_mv AT dreherconstantin evaluationofthetumormovementandthereproducibilityoftwodifferentimmobilizationsetupsforimageguidedstereotacticbodyradiotherapyoflivertumors
AT oechsnermarkus evaluationofthetumormovementandthereproducibilityoftwodifferentimmobilizationsetupsforimageguidedstereotacticbodyradiotherapyoflivertumors
AT mayingermichael evaluationofthetumormovementandthereproducibilityoftwodifferentimmobilizationsetupsforimageguidedstereotacticbodyradiotherapyoflivertumors
AT beierlstefanie evaluationofthetumormovementandthereproducibilityoftwodifferentimmobilizationsetupsforimageguidedstereotacticbodyradiotherapyoflivertumors
AT dumamarciananona evaluationofthetumormovementandthereproducibilityoftwodifferentimmobilizationsetupsforimageguidedstereotacticbodyradiotherapyoflivertumors
AT combsstephaniee evaluationofthetumormovementandthereproducibilityoftwodifferentimmobilizationsetupsforimageguidedstereotacticbodyradiotherapyoflivertumors
AT habermehldaniel evaluationofthetumormovementandthereproducibilityoftwodifferentimmobilizationsetupsforimageguidedstereotacticbodyradiotherapyoflivertumors