Cargando…
Evaluation of the tumor movement and the reproducibility of two different immobilization setups for image-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver tumors
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the tumor movement and accuracy of patient immobilization in stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver tumors with low pressure foil or abdominal compression. METHODS: Fifty-four liver tumors treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy were included...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5789593/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29378624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-0962-9 |
_version_ | 1783296311068459008 |
---|---|
author | Dreher, Constantin Oechsner, Markus Mayinger, Michael Beierl, Stefanie Duma, Marciana-Nona Combs, Stephanie E. Habermehl, Daniel |
author_facet | Dreher, Constantin Oechsner, Markus Mayinger, Michael Beierl, Stefanie Duma, Marciana-Nona Combs, Stephanie E. Habermehl, Daniel |
author_sort | Dreher, Constantin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the tumor movement and accuracy of patient immobilization in stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver tumors with low pressure foil or abdominal compression. METHODS: Fifty-four liver tumors treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy were included in this study. Forty patients were immobilized by a vacuum couch with low pressure foil, 14 patients by abdominal compression. We evaluated the ratio of gross tumor volume/internal target volume, the tumor movement in 4D-computed tomography scans and daily online adjustments after cone beam computed tomography scans. RESULTS: The ratio of gross tumor volume/internal target volume was smaller with low pressure foil. The tumor movement in 4D-computed tomography scans was smaller with abdominal compression, the cranial movement even significantly different (p = 0.02). The mean online adjustments and their mean absolute values in the vertical, lateral and longitudinal axis were smaller with abdominal compression. The online adjustments were significantly different (p < 0.013), their absolute values in case of the longitudinal axis (p = 0.043). There was no significant difference of the adjustments’ 3D vectors. CONCLUSIONS: In comparison to low pressure foil, abdominal compression leads to a reduction of the tumor movement. Online adjustments decreased significantly, thus leading to higher accuracy in patient positioning. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5789593 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57895932018-02-08 Evaluation of the tumor movement and the reproducibility of two different immobilization setups for image-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver tumors Dreher, Constantin Oechsner, Markus Mayinger, Michael Beierl, Stefanie Duma, Marciana-Nona Combs, Stephanie E. Habermehl, Daniel Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the tumor movement and accuracy of patient immobilization in stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver tumors with low pressure foil or abdominal compression. METHODS: Fifty-four liver tumors treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy were included in this study. Forty patients were immobilized by a vacuum couch with low pressure foil, 14 patients by abdominal compression. We evaluated the ratio of gross tumor volume/internal target volume, the tumor movement in 4D-computed tomography scans and daily online adjustments after cone beam computed tomography scans. RESULTS: The ratio of gross tumor volume/internal target volume was smaller with low pressure foil. The tumor movement in 4D-computed tomography scans was smaller with abdominal compression, the cranial movement even significantly different (p = 0.02). The mean online adjustments and their mean absolute values in the vertical, lateral and longitudinal axis were smaller with abdominal compression. The online adjustments were significantly different (p < 0.013), their absolute values in case of the longitudinal axis (p = 0.043). There was no significant difference of the adjustments’ 3D vectors. CONCLUSIONS: In comparison to low pressure foil, abdominal compression leads to a reduction of the tumor movement. Online adjustments decreased significantly, thus leading to higher accuracy in patient positioning. BioMed Central 2018-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5789593/ /pubmed/29378624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-0962-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Dreher, Constantin Oechsner, Markus Mayinger, Michael Beierl, Stefanie Duma, Marciana-Nona Combs, Stephanie E. Habermehl, Daniel Evaluation of the tumor movement and the reproducibility of two different immobilization setups for image-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver tumors |
title | Evaluation of the tumor movement and the reproducibility of two different immobilization setups for image-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver tumors |
title_full | Evaluation of the tumor movement and the reproducibility of two different immobilization setups for image-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver tumors |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the tumor movement and the reproducibility of two different immobilization setups for image-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver tumors |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the tumor movement and the reproducibility of two different immobilization setups for image-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver tumors |
title_short | Evaluation of the tumor movement and the reproducibility of two different immobilization setups for image-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver tumors |
title_sort | evaluation of the tumor movement and the reproducibility of two different immobilization setups for image-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver tumors |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5789593/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29378624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-0962-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dreherconstantin evaluationofthetumormovementandthereproducibilityoftwodifferentimmobilizationsetupsforimageguidedstereotacticbodyradiotherapyoflivertumors AT oechsnermarkus evaluationofthetumormovementandthereproducibilityoftwodifferentimmobilizationsetupsforimageguidedstereotacticbodyradiotherapyoflivertumors AT mayingermichael evaluationofthetumormovementandthereproducibilityoftwodifferentimmobilizationsetupsforimageguidedstereotacticbodyradiotherapyoflivertumors AT beierlstefanie evaluationofthetumormovementandthereproducibilityoftwodifferentimmobilizationsetupsforimageguidedstereotacticbodyradiotherapyoflivertumors AT dumamarciananona evaluationofthetumormovementandthereproducibilityoftwodifferentimmobilizationsetupsforimageguidedstereotacticbodyradiotherapyoflivertumors AT combsstephaniee evaluationofthetumormovementandthereproducibilityoftwodifferentimmobilizationsetupsforimageguidedstereotacticbodyradiotherapyoflivertumors AT habermehldaniel evaluationofthetumormovementandthereproducibilityoftwodifferentimmobilizationsetupsforimageguidedstereotacticbodyradiotherapyoflivertumors |