Cargando…

Video pulse rate variability analysis in stationary and motion conditions

BACKGROUND: In the last few years, some studies have measured heart rate (HR) or heart rate variability (HRV) parameters using a video camera. This technique focuses on the measurement of the small changes in skin colour caused by blood perfusion. To date, most of these works have obtained HRV param...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Melchor Rodríguez, Angel, Ramos-Castro, J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5789600/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29378598
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-018-0437-0
_version_ 1783296312723111936
author Melchor Rodríguez, Angel
Ramos-Castro, J.
author_facet Melchor Rodríguez, Angel
Ramos-Castro, J.
author_sort Melchor Rodríguez, Angel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the last few years, some studies have measured heart rate (HR) or heart rate variability (HRV) parameters using a video camera. This technique focuses on the measurement of the small changes in skin colour caused by blood perfusion. To date, most of these works have obtained HRV parameters in stationary conditions, and there are practically no studies that obtain these parameters in motion scenarios and by conducting an in-depth statistical analysis. METHODS: In this study, a video pulse rate variability (PRV) analysis is conducted by measuring the pulse-to-pulse (PP) intervals in stationary and motion conditions. Firstly, given the importance of the sampling rate in a PRV analysis and the low frame rate of commercial cameras, we carried out an analysis of two models to evaluate their performance in the measurements. We propose a selective tracking method using the Viola–Jones and KLT algorithms, with the aim of carrying out a robust video PRV analysis in stationary and motion conditions. Data and results of the proposed method are contrasted with those reported in the state of the art. RESULTS: The webcam achieved better results in the performance analysis of video cameras. In stationary conditions, high correlation values were obtained in PRV parameters with results above 0.9. The PP time series achieved an RMSE (mean ± standard deviation) of 19.45 ± 5.52 ms (1.70 ± 0.75 bpm). In the motion analysis, most of the PRV parameters also achieved good correlation results, but with lower values as regards stationary conditions. The PP time series presented an RMSE of 21.56 ± 6.41 ms (1.79 ± 0.63 bpm). CONCLUSIONS: The statistical analysis showed good agreement between the reference system and the proposed method. In stationary conditions, the results of PRV parameters were improved by our method in comparison with data reported in related works. An overall comparative analysis of PRV parameters in motion conditions was more limited due to the lack of studies or studies containing insufficient data analysis. Based on the results, the proposed method could provide a low-cost, contactless and reliable alternative for measuring HR or PRV parameters in non-clinical environments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5789600
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57896002018-02-08 Video pulse rate variability analysis in stationary and motion conditions Melchor Rodríguez, Angel Ramos-Castro, J. Biomed Eng Online Research BACKGROUND: In the last few years, some studies have measured heart rate (HR) or heart rate variability (HRV) parameters using a video camera. This technique focuses on the measurement of the small changes in skin colour caused by blood perfusion. To date, most of these works have obtained HRV parameters in stationary conditions, and there are practically no studies that obtain these parameters in motion scenarios and by conducting an in-depth statistical analysis. METHODS: In this study, a video pulse rate variability (PRV) analysis is conducted by measuring the pulse-to-pulse (PP) intervals in stationary and motion conditions. Firstly, given the importance of the sampling rate in a PRV analysis and the low frame rate of commercial cameras, we carried out an analysis of two models to evaluate their performance in the measurements. We propose a selective tracking method using the Viola–Jones and KLT algorithms, with the aim of carrying out a robust video PRV analysis in stationary and motion conditions. Data and results of the proposed method are contrasted with those reported in the state of the art. RESULTS: The webcam achieved better results in the performance analysis of video cameras. In stationary conditions, high correlation values were obtained in PRV parameters with results above 0.9. The PP time series achieved an RMSE (mean ± standard deviation) of 19.45 ± 5.52 ms (1.70 ± 0.75 bpm). In the motion analysis, most of the PRV parameters also achieved good correlation results, but with lower values as regards stationary conditions. The PP time series presented an RMSE of 21.56 ± 6.41 ms (1.79 ± 0.63 bpm). CONCLUSIONS: The statistical analysis showed good agreement between the reference system and the proposed method. In stationary conditions, the results of PRV parameters were improved by our method in comparison with data reported in related works. An overall comparative analysis of PRV parameters in motion conditions was more limited due to the lack of studies or studies containing insufficient data analysis. Based on the results, the proposed method could provide a low-cost, contactless and reliable alternative for measuring HR or PRV parameters in non-clinical environments. BioMed Central 2018-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5789600/ /pubmed/29378598 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-018-0437-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Melchor Rodríguez, Angel
Ramos-Castro, J.
Video pulse rate variability analysis in stationary and motion conditions
title Video pulse rate variability analysis in stationary and motion conditions
title_full Video pulse rate variability analysis in stationary and motion conditions
title_fullStr Video pulse rate variability analysis in stationary and motion conditions
title_full_unstemmed Video pulse rate variability analysis in stationary and motion conditions
title_short Video pulse rate variability analysis in stationary and motion conditions
title_sort video pulse rate variability analysis in stationary and motion conditions
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5789600/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29378598
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-018-0437-0
work_keys_str_mv AT melchorrodriguezangel videopulseratevariabilityanalysisinstationaryandmotionconditions
AT ramoscastroj videopulseratevariabilityanalysisinstationaryandmotionconditions