Cargando…
HyperArc VMAT planning for single and multiple brain metastases stereotactic radiosurgery: a new treatment planning approach
PURPOSE: The HyperArc VMAT (HA-VMAT) planning approach was newly developed to fulfill the demands of dose delivery for brain metastases stereotactic radiosurgery. We compared the dosimetric parameters of the HA-VMAT plan with those of the conventional VMAT (C-VMAT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: For 23 pati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5789615/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29378610 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-017-0948-z |
_version_ | 1783296316238987264 |
---|---|
author | Ohira, Shingo Ueda, Yoshihiro Akino, Yuichi Hashimoto, Misaki Masaoka, Akira Hirata, Takero Miyazaki, Masayoshi Koizumi, Masahiko Teshima, Teruki |
author_facet | Ohira, Shingo Ueda, Yoshihiro Akino, Yuichi Hashimoto, Misaki Masaoka, Akira Hirata, Takero Miyazaki, Masayoshi Koizumi, Masahiko Teshima, Teruki |
author_sort | Ohira, Shingo |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The HyperArc VMAT (HA-VMAT) planning approach was newly developed to fulfill the demands of dose delivery for brain metastases stereotactic radiosurgery. We compared the dosimetric parameters of the HA-VMAT plan with those of the conventional VMAT (C-VMAT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: For 23 patients (1–4 brain metastases), C-VMAT and HA-VMAT plans with a prescription dose of 20–24 Gy were retrospectively generated, and dosimetric parameters for PTV (homogeneity index, HI; conformity index, CI; gradient index, GI) and brain tissue (V(2Gy)-V(16Gy)) were evaluated. Subsequently, the physical characteristics (modulation complexity score for VMAT, MCSV; Monitor unit, MU) of both treatment approaches were compared. RESULTS: HA-VMAT provided higher HI (1.41 ± 0.07 vs. 1.24 ± 0.07, p < 0.01), CI (0.93 ± 0.02 vs. 0.90 ± 0.05, p = 0.01) and lower GI (3.06 ± 0.42 vs. 3.91 ± 0.55, p < 0.01) values. Moderate-to-low dose spreads (V(4Gy)-V(16Gy)) were significantly reduced (p < 0.01) in the HA-VMAT plan over that of C-VMAT. HA-VMAT plans resulted in more complex MLC patterns (lower MCSV, p < 0.01) and higher MU (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: HA-VMAT plans provided significantly higher conformity and rapid dose falloff with respect to the C-VMAT plans. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5789615 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57896152018-02-08 HyperArc VMAT planning for single and multiple brain metastases stereotactic radiosurgery: a new treatment planning approach Ohira, Shingo Ueda, Yoshihiro Akino, Yuichi Hashimoto, Misaki Masaoka, Akira Hirata, Takero Miyazaki, Masayoshi Koizumi, Masahiko Teshima, Teruki Radiat Oncol Research PURPOSE: The HyperArc VMAT (HA-VMAT) planning approach was newly developed to fulfill the demands of dose delivery for brain metastases stereotactic radiosurgery. We compared the dosimetric parameters of the HA-VMAT plan with those of the conventional VMAT (C-VMAT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: For 23 patients (1–4 brain metastases), C-VMAT and HA-VMAT plans with a prescription dose of 20–24 Gy were retrospectively generated, and dosimetric parameters for PTV (homogeneity index, HI; conformity index, CI; gradient index, GI) and brain tissue (V(2Gy)-V(16Gy)) were evaluated. Subsequently, the physical characteristics (modulation complexity score for VMAT, MCSV; Monitor unit, MU) of both treatment approaches were compared. RESULTS: HA-VMAT provided higher HI (1.41 ± 0.07 vs. 1.24 ± 0.07, p < 0.01), CI (0.93 ± 0.02 vs. 0.90 ± 0.05, p = 0.01) and lower GI (3.06 ± 0.42 vs. 3.91 ± 0.55, p < 0.01) values. Moderate-to-low dose spreads (V(4Gy)-V(16Gy)) were significantly reduced (p < 0.01) in the HA-VMAT plan over that of C-VMAT. HA-VMAT plans resulted in more complex MLC patterns (lower MCSV, p < 0.01) and higher MU (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: HA-VMAT plans provided significantly higher conformity and rapid dose falloff with respect to the C-VMAT plans. BioMed Central 2018-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5789615/ /pubmed/29378610 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-017-0948-z Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Ohira, Shingo Ueda, Yoshihiro Akino, Yuichi Hashimoto, Misaki Masaoka, Akira Hirata, Takero Miyazaki, Masayoshi Koizumi, Masahiko Teshima, Teruki HyperArc VMAT planning for single and multiple brain metastases stereotactic radiosurgery: a new treatment planning approach |
title | HyperArc VMAT planning for single and multiple brain metastases stereotactic radiosurgery: a new treatment planning approach |
title_full | HyperArc VMAT planning for single and multiple brain metastases stereotactic radiosurgery: a new treatment planning approach |
title_fullStr | HyperArc VMAT planning for single and multiple brain metastases stereotactic radiosurgery: a new treatment planning approach |
title_full_unstemmed | HyperArc VMAT planning for single and multiple brain metastases stereotactic radiosurgery: a new treatment planning approach |
title_short | HyperArc VMAT planning for single and multiple brain metastases stereotactic radiosurgery: a new treatment planning approach |
title_sort | hyperarc vmat planning for single and multiple brain metastases stereotactic radiosurgery: a new treatment planning approach |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5789615/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29378610 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-017-0948-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ohirashingo hyperarcvmatplanningforsingleandmultiplebrainmetastasesstereotacticradiosurgeryanewtreatmentplanningapproach AT uedayoshihiro hyperarcvmatplanningforsingleandmultiplebrainmetastasesstereotacticradiosurgeryanewtreatmentplanningapproach AT akinoyuichi hyperarcvmatplanningforsingleandmultiplebrainmetastasesstereotacticradiosurgeryanewtreatmentplanningapproach AT hashimotomisaki hyperarcvmatplanningforsingleandmultiplebrainmetastasesstereotacticradiosurgeryanewtreatmentplanningapproach AT masaokaakira hyperarcvmatplanningforsingleandmultiplebrainmetastasesstereotacticradiosurgeryanewtreatmentplanningapproach AT hiratatakero hyperarcvmatplanningforsingleandmultiplebrainmetastasesstereotacticradiosurgeryanewtreatmentplanningapproach AT miyazakimasayoshi hyperarcvmatplanningforsingleandmultiplebrainmetastasesstereotacticradiosurgeryanewtreatmentplanningapproach AT koizumimasahiko hyperarcvmatplanningforsingleandmultiplebrainmetastasesstereotacticradiosurgeryanewtreatmentplanningapproach AT teshimateruki hyperarcvmatplanningforsingleandmultiplebrainmetastasesstereotacticradiosurgeryanewtreatmentplanningapproach |