Cargando…

HyperArc VMAT planning for single and multiple brain metastases stereotactic radiosurgery: a new treatment planning approach

PURPOSE: The HyperArc VMAT (HA-VMAT) planning approach was newly developed to fulfill the demands of dose delivery for brain metastases stereotactic radiosurgery. We compared the dosimetric parameters of the HA-VMAT plan with those of the conventional VMAT (C-VMAT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: For 23 pati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ohira, Shingo, Ueda, Yoshihiro, Akino, Yuichi, Hashimoto, Misaki, Masaoka, Akira, Hirata, Takero, Miyazaki, Masayoshi, Koizumi, Masahiko, Teshima, Teruki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5789615/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29378610
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-017-0948-z
_version_ 1783296316238987264
author Ohira, Shingo
Ueda, Yoshihiro
Akino, Yuichi
Hashimoto, Misaki
Masaoka, Akira
Hirata, Takero
Miyazaki, Masayoshi
Koizumi, Masahiko
Teshima, Teruki
author_facet Ohira, Shingo
Ueda, Yoshihiro
Akino, Yuichi
Hashimoto, Misaki
Masaoka, Akira
Hirata, Takero
Miyazaki, Masayoshi
Koizumi, Masahiko
Teshima, Teruki
author_sort Ohira, Shingo
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The HyperArc VMAT (HA-VMAT) planning approach was newly developed to fulfill the demands of dose delivery for brain metastases stereotactic radiosurgery. We compared the dosimetric parameters of the HA-VMAT plan with those of the conventional VMAT (C-VMAT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: For 23 patients (1–4 brain metastases), C-VMAT and HA-VMAT plans with a prescription dose of 20–24 Gy were retrospectively generated, and dosimetric parameters for PTV (homogeneity index, HI; conformity index, CI; gradient index, GI) and brain tissue (V(2Gy)-V(16Gy)) were evaluated. Subsequently, the physical characteristics (modulation complexity score for VMAT, MCSV; Monitor unit, MU) of both treatment approaches were compared. RESULTS: HA-VMAT provided higher HI (1.41 ± 0.07 vs. 1.24 ± 0.07, p < 0.01), CI (0.93 ± 0.02 vs. 0.90 ± 0.05, p = 0.01) and lower GI (3.06 ± 0.42 vs. 3.91 ± 0.55, p < 0.01) values. Moderate-to-low dose spreads (V(4Gy)-V(16Gy)) were significantly reduced (p < 0.01) in the HA-VMAT plan over that of C-VMAT. HA-VMAT plans resulted in more complex MLC patterns (lower MCSV, p < 0.01) and higher MU (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: HA-VMAT plans provided significantly higher conformity and rapid dose falloff with respect to the C-VMAT plans.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5789615
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57896152018-02-08 HyperArc VMAT planning for single and multiple brain metastases stereotactic radiosurgery: a new treatment planning approach Ohira, Shingo Ueda, Yoshihiro Akino, Yuichi Hashimoto, Misaki Masaoka, Akira Hirata, Takero Miyazaki, Masayoshi Koizumi, Masahiko Teshima, Teruki Radiat Oncol Research PURPOSE: The HyperArc VMAT (HA-VMAT) planning approach was newly developed to fulfill the demands of dose delivery for brain metastases stereotactic radiosurgery. We compared the dosimetric parameters of the HA-VMAT plan with those of the conventional VMAT (C-VMAT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: For 23 patients (1–4 brain metastases), C-VMAT and HA-VMAT plans with a prescription dose of 20–24 Gy were retrospectively generated, and dosimetric parameters for PTV (homogeneity index, HI; conformity index, CI; gradient index, GI) and brain tissue (V(2Gy)-V(16Gy)) were evaluated. Subsequently, the physical characteristics (modulation complexity score for VMAT, MCSV; Monitor unit, MU) of both treatment approaches were compared. RESULTS: HA-VMAT provided higher HI (1.41 ± 0.07 vs. 1.24 ± 0.07, p < 0.01), CI (0.93 ± 0.02 vs. 0.90 ± 0.05, p = 0.01) and lower GI (3.06 ± 0.42 vs. 3.91 ± 0.55, p < 0.01) values. Moderate-to-low dose spreads (V(4Gy)-V(16Gy)) were significantly reduced (p < 0.01) in the HA-VMAT plan over that of C-VMAT. HA-VMAT plans resulted in more complex MLC patterns (lower MCSV, p < 0.01) and higher MU (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: HA-VMAT plans provided significantly higher conformity and rapid dose falloff with respect to the C-VMAT plans. BioMed Central 2018-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5789615/ /pubmed/29378610 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-017-0948-z Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Ohira, Shingo
Ueda, Yoshihiro
Akino, Yuichi
Hashimoto, Misaki
Masaoka, Akira
Hirata, Takero
Miyazaki, Masayoshi
Koizumi, Masahiko
Teshima, Teruki
HyperArc VMAT planning for single and multiple brain metastases stereotactic radiosurgery: a new treatment planning approach
title HyperArc VMAT planning for single and multiple brain metastases stereotactic radiosurgery: a new treatment planning approach
title_full HyperArc VMAT planning for single and multiple brain metastases stereotactic radiosurgery: a new treatment planning approach
title_fullStr HyperArc VMAT planning for single and multiple brain metastases stereotactic radiosurgery: a new treatment planning approach
title_full_unstemmed HyperArc VMAT planning for single and multiple brain metastases stereotactic radiosurgery: a new treatment planning approach
title_short HyperArc VMAT planning for single and multiple brain metastases stereotactic radiosurgery: a new treatment planning approach
title_sort hyperarc vmat planning for single and multiple brain metastases stereotactic radiosurgery: a new treatment planning approach
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5789615/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29378610
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-017-0948-z
work_keys_str_mv AT ohirashingo hyperarcvmatplanningforsingleandmultiplebrainmetastasesstereotacticradiosurgeryanewtreatmentplanningapproach
AT uedayoshihiro hyperarcvmatplanningforsingleandmultiplebrainmetastasesstereotacticradiosurgeryanewtreatmentplanningapproach
AT akinoyuichi hyperarcvmatplanningforsingleandmultiplebrainmetastasesstereotacticradiosurgeryanewtreatmentplanningapproach
AT hashimotomisaki hyperarcvmatplanningforsingleandmultiplebrainmetastasesstereotacticradiosurgeryanewtreatmentplanningapproach
AT masaokaakira hyperarcvmatplanningforsingleandmultiplebrainmetastasesstereotacticradiosurgeryanewtreatmentplanningapproach
AT hiratatakero hyperarcvmatplanningforsingleandmultiplebrainmetastasesstereotacticradiosurgeryanewtreatmentplanningapproach
AT miyazakimasayoshi hyperarcvmatplanningforsingleandmultiplebrainmetastasesstereotacticradiosurgeryanewtreatmentplanningapproach
AT koizumimasahiko hyperarcvmatplanningforsingleandmultiplebrainmetastasesstereotacticradiosurgeryanewtreatmentplanningapproach
AT teshimateruki hyperarcvmatplanningforsingleandmultiplebrainmetastasesstereotacticradiosurgeryanewtreatmentplanningapproach