Cargando…

Tools for a systematic appraisal of integrated community-based approaches to prevent childhood obesity

BACKGROUND: Evaluation and monitoring methods are often unable to identify crucial elements of success or failure of integrated community-wide approaches aiming to tackle childhood overweight and obesity, yet difficult to determine in complex programmes. Therefore, we aimed to systematically apprais...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mantziki, K., Renders, C. M., Westerman, M. J., Mayer, J., Borys, J. M., Seidell, J. C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5789618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29378550
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5042-4
_version_ 1783296316950970368
author Mantziki, K.
Renders, C. M.
Westerman, M. J.
Mayer, J.
Borys, J. M.
Seidell, J. C.
author_facet Mantziki, K.
Renders, C. M.
Westerman, M. J.
Mayer, J.
Borys, J. M.
Seidell, J. C.
author_sort Mantziki, K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Evaluation and monitoring methods are often unable to identify crucial elements of success or failure of integrated community-wide approaches aiming to tackle childhood overweight and obesity, yet difficult to determine in complex programmes. Therefore, we aimed to systematically appraise strengths and weaknesses of such programmes and to assess the usefulness of the appraisal tools used. METHODS: To identify strengths and weaknesses of the integrated community-based approaches two tools were used: the Good Practice Appraisal tool for obesity prevention programmes, projects, initiatives and intervention (GPAT), a self-administered questionnaire developed by the WHO; and the OPEN tool, a structured list of questions based on the EPODE theory, to assist face-to-face interviews with the principle programme coordinators. The strengths and weaknesses of these tools were assessed with regard to practicalities, quality of acquired data and the appraisal process, criteria and scoring. RESULTS: Several strengths and weaknesses were identified in all the assessed integrated community-based approaches, different for each of them. The GPAT provided information mostly on intervention elements whereas through the OPEN tool information on both the programme and intervention levels were acquired. CONCLUSION: Large variability between integrated community-wide approaches preventing childhood obesity in the European region was identified and therefore each of them has different needs. Both tools used in combination seem to facilitate comprehensive assessment of integrated community-wide approaches in a systematic manner, which is rarely conducted. Nonetheless, the tools should be improved in line to their limitations as recommended in this manuscript. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-018-5042-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5789618
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57896182018-02-08 Tools for a systematic appraisal of integrated community-based approaches to prevent childhood obesity Mantziki, K. Renders, C. M. Westerman, M. J. Mayer, J. Borys, J. M. Seidell, J. C. BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Evaluation and monitoring methods are often unable to identify crucial elements of success or failure of integrated community-wide approaches aiming to tackle childhood overweight and obesity, yet difficult to determine in complex programmes. Therefore, we aimed to systematically appraise strengths and weaknesses of such programmes and to assess the usefulness of the appraisal tools used. METHODS: To identify strengths and weaknesses of the integrated community-based approaches two tools were used: the Good Practice Appraisal tool for obesity prevention programmes, projects, initiatives and intervention (GPAT), a self-administered questionnaire developed by the WHO; and the OPEN tool, a structured list of questions based on the EPODE theory, to assist face-to-face interviews with the principle programme coordinators. The strengths and weaknesses of these tools were assessed with regard to practicalities, quality of acquired data and the appraisal process, criteria and scoring. RESULTS: Several strengths and weaknesses were identified in all the assessed integrated community-based approaches, different for each of them. The GPAT provided information mostly on intervention elements whereas through the OPEN tool information on both the programme and intervention levels were acquired. CONCLUSION: Large variability between integrated community-wide approaches preventing childhood obesity in the European region was identified and therefore each of them has different needs. Both tools used in combination seem to facilitate comprehensive assessment of integrated community-wide approaches in a systematic manner, which is rarely conducted. Nonetheless, the tools should be improved in line to their limitations as recommended in this manuscript. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-018-5042-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5789618/ /pubmed/29378550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5042-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mantziki, K.
Renders, C. M.
Westerman, M. J.
Mayer, J.
Borys, J. M.
Seidell, J. C.
Tools for a systematic appraisal of integrated community-based approaches to prevent childhood obesity
title Tools for a systematic appraisal of integrated community-based approaches to prevent childhood obesity
title_full Tools for a systematic appraisal of integrated community-based approaches to prevent childhood obesity
title_fullStr Tools for a systematic appraisal of integrated community-based approaches to prevent childhood obesity
title_full_unstemmed Tools for a systematic appraisal of integrated community-based approaches to prevent childhood obesity
title_short Tools for a systematic appraisal of integrated community-based approaches to prevent childhood obesity
title_sort tools for a systematic appraisal of integrated community-based approaches to prevent childhood obesity
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5789618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29378550
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5042-4
work_keys_str_mv AT mantzikik toolsforasystematicappraisalofintegratedcommunitybasedapproachestopreventchildhoodobesity
AT renderscm toolsforasystematicappraisalofintegratedcommunitybasedapproachestopreventchildhoodobesity
AT westermanmj toolsforasystematicappraisalofintegratedcommunitybasedapproachestopreventchildhoodobesity
AT mayerj toolsforasystematicappraisalofintegratedcommunitybasedapproachestopreventchildhoodobesity
AT borysjm toolsforasystematicappraisalofintegratedcommunitybasedapproachestopreventchildhoodobesity
AT seidelljc toolsforasystematicappraisalofintegratedcommunitybasedapproachestopreventchildhoodobesity