Cargando…

Diagnostic performance of (18)F-FDG PET/CT using point spread function reconstruction on initial staging of rectal cancer: a comparison study with conventional PET/CT and pelvic MRI

BACKGROUND: Accurate staging is crucial for treatment selection and prognosis prediction in patients with rectal cancer. Point spread function (PSF) reconstruction can improve spatial resolution and signal-to-noise ratio of PET imaging. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of (18)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hotta, Masatoshi, Minamimoto, Ryogo, Yano, Hideaki, Gohda, Yoshimasa, Shuno, Yasutaka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5789619/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29378659
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40644-018-0137-9
_version_ 1783296317198434304
author Hotta, Masatoshi
Minamimoto, Ryogo
Yano, Hideaki
Gohda, Yoshimasa
Shuno, Yasutaka
author_facet Hotta, Masatoshi
Minamimoto, Ryogo
Yano, Hideaki
Gohda, Yoshimasa
Shuno, Yasutaka
author_sort Hotta, Masatoshi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Accurate staging is crucial for treatment selection and prognosis prediction in patients with rectal cancer. Point spread function (PSF) reconstruction can improve spatial resolution and signal-to-noise ratio of PET imaging. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of (18)F-FDG PET/CT with PSF reconstruction for initial staging in rectal cancer compared with conventional PET/CT and pelvic MRI. METHODS: A total of 59 patients with rectal cancer underwent preoperative (18)F-FDG PET/CT and pelvic MRI. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and lesion to background (L/B) ratio of possible metastatic lymph nodes, and metabolic tumor volumes (MTVs) of primary tumors were calculated. For N and T (T1-2 vs T3-4) staging, sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive values, negative predictive values, and accuracies were compared between conventional PET/CT [reconstructed with ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM)], PSF-PET/CT (reconstructed with OSEM+PSF), and pelvic MRI. Histopathologic analysis was the reference standard. RESULTS: For N staging, PSF-PET/CT provided higher sensitivity (78.6%) than conventional PET/CT (64.3%), and pelvic MRI (57.1%), and all techniques showed high specificity (PSF-PET: 95.4%, conventional PET: 96.7%, pelvic MRI: 93.5%). SUVmax and L/B ratio were significantly higher in PSF-PET/CT than conventional-PET/CT (p < 0.001). The accuracy for T staging in PSF-PET/CT (69.4%) was not significantly different to conventional PET/CT (73.5%) and pelvic MRI (73.5%). MTVs of PSF and conventional PET showed a significant difference among T stages (p < 0.001), with higher values in advanced stages. In M staging, both PSF and conventional PET/CT diagnosed all distant metastases correctly. CONCLUSIONS: PSF-PET/CT produced images with higher lesion-to-background contrast than conventional PET/CT, which allowed improved detection of lymph node metastasis without compromising specificity, and showed comparable diagnostic value to MRI in local staging. PSF-PET/CT is likely to have a great value for initial staging in rectal cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5789619
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57896192018-02-08 Diagnostic performance of (18)F-FDG PET/CT using point spread function reconstruction on initial staging of rectal cancer: a comparison study with conventional PET/CT and pelvic MRI Hotta, Masatoshi Minamimoto, Ryogo Yano, Hideaki Gohda, Yoshimasa Shuno, Yasutaka Cancer Imaging Research Article BACKGROUND: Accurate staging is crucial for treatment selection and prognosis prediction in patients with rectal cancer. Point spread function (PSF) reconstruction can improve spatial resolution and signal-to-noise ratio of PET imaging. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of (18)F-FDG PET/CT with PSF reconstruction for initial staging in rectal cancer compared with conventional PET/CT and pelvic MRI. METHODS: A total of 59 patients with rectal cancer underwent preoperative (18)F-FDG PET/CT and pelvic MRI. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and lesion to background (L/B) ratio of possible metastatic lymph nodes, and metabolic tumor volumes (MTVs) of primary tumors were calculated. For N and T (T1-2 vs T3-4) staging, sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive values, negative predictive values, and accuracies were compared between conventional PET/CT [reconstructed with ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM)], PSF-PET/CT (reconstructed with OSEM+PSF), and pelvic MRI. Histopathologic analysis was the reference standard. RESULTS: For N staging, PSF-PET/CT provided higher sensitivity (78.6%) than conventional PET/CT (64.3%), and pelvic MRI (57.1%), and all techniques showed high specificity (PSF-PET: 95.4%, conventional PET: 96.7%, pelvic MRI: 93.5%). SUVmax and L/B ratio were significantly higher in PSF-PET/CT than conventional-PET/CT (p < 0.001). The accuracy for T staging in PSF-PET/CT (69.4%) was not significantly different to conventional PET/CT (73.5%) and pelvic MRI (73.5%). MTVs of PSF and conventional PET showed a significant difference among T stages (p < 0.001), with higher values in advanced stages. In M staging, both PSF and conventional PET/CT diagnosed all distant metastases correctly. CONCLUSIONS: PSF-PET/CT produced images with higher lesion-to-background contrast than conventional PET/CT, which allowed improved detection of lymph node metastasis without compromising specificity, and showed comparable diagnostic value to MRI in local staging. PSF-PET/CT is likely to have a great value for initial staging in rectal cancer. BioMed Central 2018-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5789619/ /pubmed/29378659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40644-018-0137-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hotta, Masatoshi
Minamimoto, Ryogo
Yano, Hideaki
Gohda, Yoshimasa
Shuno, Yasutaka
Diagnostic performance of (18)F-FDG PET/CT using point spread function reconstruction on initial staging of rectal cancer: a comparison study with conventional PET/CT and pelvic MRI
title Diagnostic performance of (18)F-FDG PET/CT using point spread function reconstruction on initial staging of rectal cancer: a comparison study with conventional PET/CT and pelvic MRI
title_full Diagnostic performance of (18)F-FDG PET/CT using point spread function reconstruction on initial staging of rectal cancer: a comparison study with conventional PET/CT and pelvic MRI
title_fullStr Diagnostic performance of (18)F-FDG PET/CT using point spread function reconstruction on initial staging of rectal cancer: a comparison study with conventional PET/CT and pelvic MRI
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic performance of (18)F-FDG PET/CT using point spread function reconstruction on initial staging of rectal cancer: a comparison study with conventional PET/CT and pelvic MRI
title_short Diagnostic performance of (18)F-FDG PET/CT using point spread function reconstruction on initial staging of rectal cancer: a comparison study with conventional PET/CT and pelvic MRI
title_sort diagnostic performance of (18)f-fdg pet/ct using point spread function reconstruction on initial staging of rectal cancer: a comparison study with conventional pet/ct and pelvic mri
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5789619/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29378659
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40644-018-0137-9
work_keys_str_mv AT hottamasatoshi diagnosticperformanceof18ffdgpetctusingpointspreadfunctionreconstructiononinitialstagingofrectalcanceracomparisonstudywithconventionalpetctandpelvicmri
AT minamimotoryogo diagnosticperformanceof18ffdgpetctusingpointspreadfunctionreconstructiononinitialstagingofrectalcanceracomparisonstudywithconventionalpetctandpelvicmri
AT yanohideaki diagnosticperformanceof18ffdgpetctusingpointspreadfunctionreconstructiononinitialstagingofrectalcanceracomparisonstudywithconventionalpetctandpelvicmri
AT gohdayoshimasa diagnosticperformanceof18ffdgpetctusingpointspreadfunctionreconstructiononinitialstagingofrectalcanceracomparisonstudywithconventionalpetctandpelvicmri
AT shunoyasutaka diagnosticperformanceof18ffdgpetctusingpointspreadfunctionreconstructiononinitialstagingofrectalcanceracomparisonstudywithconventionalpetctandpelvicmri