Cargando…
Changes in Distribution of Dry Eye Disease by the New 2016 Diagnostic Criteria from the Asia Dry Eye Society
Dry eye disease (DED) is a disorder of the tear film. Here, we delineate the changes in distribution of DED after diagnostic criteria changes from the 2006 Japanese Diagnostic Criteria to the 2016 Asia Dry Eye Society criteria. We included 250 right eyes of 250 patients and all patients completed op...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5789837/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29382858 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19775-3 |
_version_ | 1783296359062831104 |
---|---|
author | Inomata, Takenori Shiang, Tina Iwagami, Masao Sakemi, Fumika Fujimoto, Keiichi Okumura, Yuichi Ohno, Mizu Murakami, Akira |
author_facet | Inomata, Takenori Shiang, Tina Iwagami, Masao Sakemi, Fumika Fujimoto, Keiichi Okumura, Yuichi Ohno, Mizu Murakami, Akira |
author_sort | Inomata, Takenori |
collection | PubMed |
description | Dry eye disease (DED) is a disorder of the tear film. Here, we delineate the changes in distribution of DED after diagnostic criteria changes from the 2006 Japanese Diagnostic Criteria to the 2016 Asia Dry Eye Society criteria. We included 250 right eyes of 250 patients and all patients completed ophthalmic assessments for DED. The 2006 criteria classified patients into definite DED, probable DED, and non-DED based on subjective symptoms, tear function, and/or vital staining. The 2016 criteria eliminated probable DED and classified patients into definite DED or non-DED based on subjective symptoms and decreased tear break-up time. We examined how probable DED patients were reclassified by the 2016 criteria. By the 2006 criteria, 38.8% (97/250) of patients had definite DED, 35.6% (89/250) had probable DED, and 25.6% (64/250) had non-DED. By the 2016 criteria, 66.8% (167/250) had definite DED and 33.2% (83/250) had non-DED. Among patients with probable DED using the 2006 criteria, 79.8% (71/89) were reclassified as definite DED and 20.2% (18/89) were reclassified as non-DED using the 2016 criteria. Our data revealed that prevalence of definite DED increased because most probable DED patients were reclassified as definite DED after changes in the diagnostic criteria. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5789837 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57898372018-02-15 Changes in Distribution of Dry Eye Disease by the New 2016 Diagnostic Criteria from the Asia Dry Eye Society Inomata, Takenori Shiang, Tina Iwagami, Masao Sakemi, Fumika Fujimoto, Keiichi Okumura, Yuichi Ohno, Mizu Murakami, Akira Sci Rep Article Dry eye disease (DED) is a disorder of the tear film. Here, we delineate the changes in distribution of DED after diagnostic criteria changes from the 2006 Japanese Diagnostic Criteria to the 2016 Asia Dry Eye Society criteria. We included 250 right eyes of 250 patients and all patients completed ophthalmic assessments for DED. The 2006 criteria classified patients into definite DED, probable DED, and non-DED based on subjective symptoms, tear function, and/or vital staining. The 2016 criteria eliminated probable DED and classified patients into definite DED or non-DED based on subjective symptoms and decreased tear break-up time. We examined how probable DED patients were reclassified by the 2016 criteria. By the 2006 criteria, 38.8% (97/250) of patients had definite DED, 35.6% (89/250) had probable DED, and 25.6% (64/250) had non-DED. By the 2016 criteria, 66.8% (167/250) had definite DED and 33.2% (83/250) had non-DED. Among patients with probable DED using the 2006 criteria, 79.8% (71/89) were reclassified as definite DED and 20.2% (18/89) were reclassified as non-DED using the 2016 criteria. Our data revealed that prevalence of definite DED increased because most probable DED patients were reclassified as definite DED after changes in the diagnostic criteria. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5789837/ /pubmed/29382858 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19775-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Inomata, Takenori Shiang, Tina Iwagami, Masao Sakemi, Fumika Fujimoto, Keiichi Okumura, Yuichi Ohno, Mizu Murakami, Akira Changes in Distribution of Dry Eye Disease by the New 2016 Diagnostic Criteria from the Asia Dry Eye Society |
title | Changes in Distribution of Dry Eye Disease by the New 2016 Diagnostic Criteria from the Asia Dry Eye Society |
title_full | Changes in Distribution of Dry Eye Disease by the New 2016 Diagnostic Criteria from the Asia Dry Eye Society |
title_fullStr | Changes in Distribution of Dry Eye Disease by the New 2016 Diagnostic Criteria from the Asia Dry Eye Society |
title_full_unstemmed | Changes in Distribution of Dry Eye Disease by the New 2016 Diagnostic Criteria from the Asia Dry Eye Society |
title_short | Changes in Distribution of Dry Eye Disease by the New 2016 Diagnostic Criteria from the Asia Dry Eye Society |
title_sort | changes in distribution of dry eye disease by the new 2016 diagnostic criteria from the asia dry eye society |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5789837/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29382858 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19775-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT inomatatakenori changesindistributionofdryeyediseasebythenew2016diagnosticcriteriafromtheasiadryeyesociety AT shiangtina changesindistributionofdryeyediseasebythenew2016diagnosticcriteriafromtheasiadryeyesociety AT iwagamimasao changesindistributionofdryeyediseasebythenew2016diagnosticcriteriafromtheasiadryeyesociety AT sakemifumika changesindistributionofdryeyediseasebythenew2016diagnosticcriteriafromtheasiadryeyesociety AT fujimotokeiichi changesindistributionofdryeyediseasebythenew2016diagnosticcriteriafromtheasiadryeyesociety AT okumurayuichi changesindistributionofdryeyediseasebythenew2016diagnosticcriteriafromtheasiadryeyesociety AT ohnomizu changesindistributionofdryeyediseasebythenew2016diagnosticcriteriafromtheasiadryeyesociety AT murakamiakira changesindistributionofdryeyediseasebythenew2016diagnosticcriteriafromtheasiadryeyesociety |