Cargando…

Changes in Distribution of Dry Eye Disease by the New 2016 Diagnostic Criteria from the Asia Dry Eye Society

Dry eye disease (DED) is a disorder of the tear film. Here, we delineate the changes in distribution of DED after diagnostic criteria changes from the 2006 Japanese Diagnostic Criteria to the 2016 Asia Dry Eye Society criteria. We included 250 right eyes of 250 patients and all patients completed op...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Inomata, Takenori, Shiang, Tina, Iwagami, Masao, Sakemi, Fumika, Fujimoto, Keiichi, Okumura, Yuichi, Ohno, Mizu, Murakami, Akira
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5789837/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29382858
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19775-3
_version_ 1783296359062831104
author Inomata, Takenori
Shiang, Tina
Iwagami, Masao
Sakemi, Fumika
Fujimoto, Keiichi
Okumura, Yuichi
Ohno, Mizu
Murakami, Akira
author_facet Inomata, Takenori
Shiang, Tina
Iwagami, Masao
Sakemi, Fumika
Fujimoto, Keiichi
Okumura, Yuichi
Ohno, Mizu
Murakami, Akira
author_sort Inomata, Takenori
collection PubMed
description Dry eye disease (DED) is a disorder of the tear film. Here, we delineate the changes in distribution of DED after diagnostic criteria changes from the 2006 Japanese Diagnostic Criteria to the 2016 Asia Dry Eye Society criteria. We included 250 right eyes of 250 patients and all patients completed ophthalmic assessments for DED. The 2006 criteria classified patients into definite DED, probable DED, and non-DED based on subjective symptoms, tear function, and/or vital staining. The 2016 criteria eliminated probable DED and classified patients into definite DED or non-DED based on subjective symptoms and decreased tear break-up time. We examined how probable DED patients were reclassified by the 2016 criteria. By the 2006 criteria, 38.8% (97/250) of patients had definite DED, 35.6% (89/250) had probable DED, and 25.6% (64/250) had non-DED. By the 2016 criteria, 66.8% (167/250) had definite DED and 33.2% (83/250) had non-DED. Among patients with probable DED using the 2006 criteria, 79.8% (71/89) were reclassified as definite DED and 20.2% (18/89) were reclassified as non-DED using the 2016 criteria. Our data revealed that prevalence of definite DED increased because most probable DED patients were reclassified as definite DED after changes in the diagnostic criteria.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5789837
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57898372018-02-15 Changes in Distribution of Dry Eye Disease by the New 2016 Diagnostic Criteria from the Asia Dry Eye Society Inomata, Takenori Shiang, Tina Iwagami, Masao Sakemi, Fumika Fujimoto, Keiichi Okumura, Yuichi Ohno, Mizu Murakami, Akira Sci Rep Article Dry eye disease (DED) is a disorder of the tear film. Here, we delineate the changes in distribution of DED after diagnostic criteria changes from the 2006 Japanese Diagnostic Criteria to the 2016 Asia Dry Eye Society criteria. We included 250 right eyes of 250 patients and all patients completed ophthalmic assessments for DED. The 2006 criteria classified patients into definite DED, probable DED, and non-DED based on subjective symptoms, tear function, and/or vital staining. The 2016 criteria eliminated probable DED and classified patients into definite DED or non-DED based on subjective symptoms and decreased tear break-up time. We examined how probable DED patients were reclassified by the 2016 criteria. By the 2006 criteria, 38.8% (97/250) of patients had definite DED, 35.6% (89/250) had probable DED, and 25.6% (64/250) had non-DED. By the 2016 criteria, 66.8% (167/250) had definite DED and 33.2% (83/250) had non-DED. Among patients with probable DED using the 2006 criteria, 79.8% (71/89) were reclassified as definite DED and 20.2% (18/89) were reclassified as non-DED using the 2016 criteria. Our data revealed that prevalence of definite DED increased because most probable DED patients were reclassified as definite DED after changes in the diagnostic criteria. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5789837/ /pubmed/29382858 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19775-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Inomata, Takenori
Shiang, Tina
Iwagami, Masao
Sakemi, Fumika
Fujimoto, Keiichi
Okumura, Yuichi
Ohno, Mizu
Murakami, Akira
Changes in Distribution of Dry Eye Disease by the New 2016 Diagnostic Criteria from the Asia Dry Eye Society
title Changes in Distribution of Dry Eye Disease by the New 2016 Diagnostic Criteria from the Asia Dry Eye Society
title_full Changes in Distribution of Dry Eye Disease by the New 2016 Diagnostic Criteria from the Asia Dry Eye Society
title_fullStr Changes in Distribution of Dry Eye Disease by the New 2016 Diagnostic Criteria from the Asia Dry Eye Society
title_full_unstemmed Changes in Distribution of Dry Eye Disease by the New 2016 Diagnostic Criteria from the Asia Dry Eye Society
title_short Changes in Distribution of Dry Eye Disease by the New 2016 Diagnostic Criteria from the Asia Dry Eye Society
title_sort changes in distribution of dry eye disease by the new 2016 diagnostic criteria from the asia dry eye society
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5789837/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29382858
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19775-3
work_keys_str_mv AT inomatatakenori changesindistributionofdryeyediseasebythenew2016diagnosticcriteriafromtheasiadryeyesociety
AT shiangtina changesindistributionofdryeyediseasebythenew2016diagnosticcriteriafromtheasiadryeyesociety
AT iwagamimasao changesindistributionofdryeyediseasebythenew2016diagnosticcriteriafromtheasiadryeyesociety
AT sakemifumika changesindistributionofdryeyediseasebythenew2016diagnosticcriteriafromtheasiadryeyesociety
AT fujimotokeiichi changesindistributionofdryeyediseasebythenew2016diagnosticcriteriafromtheasiadryeyesociety
AT okumurayuichi changesindistributionofdryeyediseasebythenew2016diagnosticcriteriafromtheasiadryeyesociety
AT ohnomizu changesindistributionofdryeyediseasebythenew2016diagnosticcriteriafromtheasiadryeyesociety
AT murakamiakira changesindistributionofdryeyediseasebythenew2016diagnosticcriteriafromtheasiadryeyesociety