Cargando…

Age Is Relative—Impact of Donor Age on Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cell Functionality

Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) avoid many of the restrictions that hamper the application of human embryonic stem cells: limited availability of source material due to legal restrictions in some countries, immunogenic rejection and ethical concerns. Also, the donor’s clinical phenotype is of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Strässler, Elisabeth Tamara, Aalto-Setälä, Katriina, Kiamehr, Mostafa, Landmesser, Ulf, Kränkel, Nicolle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5790033/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29423397
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2018.00004
_version_ 1783296388850778112
author Strässler, Elisabeth Tamara
Aalto-Setälä, Katriina
Kiamehr, Mostafa
Landmesser, Ulf
Kränkel, Nicolle
author_facet Strässler, Elisabeth Tamara
Aalto-Setälä, Katriina
Kiamehr, Mostafa
Landmesser, Ulf
Kränkel, Nicolle
author_sort Strässler, Elisabeth Tamara
collection PubMed
description Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) avoid many of the restrictions that hamper the application of human embryonic stem cells: limited availability of source material due to legal restrictions in some countries, immunogenic rejection and ethical concerns. Also, the donor’s clinical phenotype is often known when working with iPSCs. Therefore, iPSCs seem ideal to tackle the two biggest tasks of regenerative medicine: degenerative diseases with genetic cause (e.g., Duchenne’s muscular dystrophy) and organ replacement in age-related diseases (e.g., end-stage heart or renal failure), especially in combination with recently developed gene-editing tools. In the setting of autologous transplantation in elderly patients, donor age becomes a potentially relevant factor that needs to be assessed. Here, we review and critically discuss available data pertinent to the questions: How does donor age influence the reprogramming process and iPSC functionality? Would it even be possible to reprogram senescent somatic cells? How does donor age affect iPSC differentiation into specialised cells and their functionality? We also identify research needs, which might help resolve current unknowns. Until recently, most hallmarks of ageing were attributed to an accumulation of DNA damage over time, and it was thus expected that DNA damage from a somatic cell would accumulate in iPSCs and the cells derived from them. In line with this, a decreased lifespan of cloned organisms compared with the donor was also observed in early cloning experiments. Therefore, it was questioned for a time whether iPSC derived from an old individual’s somatic cells would suffer from early senescence and, thus, may not be a viable option either for disease modelling nor future clinical applications. Instead, typical signs of cellular ageing are reverted in the process of iPSC reprogramming, and iPSCs from older donors do not show diminished differentiation potential nor do iPSC-derived cells from older donors suffer early senescence or show functional impairments when compared with those from younger donors. Thus, the data would suggest that donor age does not limit iPSC application for modelling genetic diseases nor regenerative therapies. However, open questions remain, e.g., regarding the potential tumourigenicity of iPSC-derived cells and the impact of epigenetic pattern retention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5790033
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57900332018-02-08 Age Is Relative—Impact of Donor Age on Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cell Functionality Strässler, Elisabeth Tamara Aalto-Setälä, Katriina Kiamehr, Mostafa Landmesser, Ulf Kränkel, Nicolle Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) avoid many of the restrictions that hamper the application of human embryonic stem cells: limited availability of source material due to legal restrictions in some countries, immunogenic rejection and ethical concerns. Also, the donor’s clinical phenotype is often known when working with iPSCs. Therefore, iPSCs seem ideal to tackle the two biggest tasks of regenerative medicine: degenerative diseases with genetic cause (e.g., Duchenne’s muscular dystrophy) and organ replacement in age-related diseases (e.g., end-stage heart or renal failure), especially in combination with recently developed gene-editing tools. In the setting of autologous transplantation in elderly patients, donor age becomes a potentially relevant factor that needs to be assessed. Here, we review and critically discuss available data pertinent to the questions: How does donor age influence the reprogramming process and iPSC functionality? Would it even be possible to reprogram senescent somatic cells? How does donor age affect iPSC differentiation into specialised cells and their functionality? We also identify research needs, which might help resolve current unknowns. Until recently, most hallmarks of ageing were attributed to an accumulation of DNA damage over time, and it was thus expected that DNA damage from a somatic cell would accumulate in iPSCs and the cells derived from them. In line with this, a decreased lifespan of cloned organisms compared with the donor was also observed in early cloning experiments. Therefore, it was questioned for a time whether iPSC derived from an old individual’s somatic cells would suffer from early senescence and, thus, may not be a viable option either for disease modelling nor future clinical applications. Instead, typical signs of cellular ageing are reverted in the process of iPSC reprogramming, and iPSCs from older donors do not show diminished differentiation potential nor do iPSC-derived cells from older donors suffer early senescence or show functional impairments when compared with those from younger donors. Thus, the data would suggest that donor age does not limit iPSC application for modelling genetic diseases nor regenerative therapies. However, open questions remain, e.g., regarding the potential tumourigenicity of iPSC-derived cells and the impact of epigenetic pattern retention. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5790033/ /pubmed/29423397 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2018.00004 Text en Copyright © 2018 Strässler, Aalto-Setälä, Kiamehr, Landmesser and Kränkel. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Strässler, Elisabeth Tamara
Aalto-Setälä, Katriina
Kiamehr, Mostafa
Landmesser, Ulf
Kränkel, Nicolle
Age Is Relative—Impact of Donor Age on Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cell Functionality
title Age Is Relative—Impact of Donor Age on Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cell Functionality
title_full Age Is Relative—Impact of Donor Age on Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cell Functionality
title_fullStr Age Is Relative—Impact of Donor Age on Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cell Functionality
title_full_unstemmed Age Is Relative—Impact of Donor Age on Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cell Functionality
title_short Age Is Relative—Impact of Donor Age on Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cell Functionality
title_sort age is relative—impact of donor age on induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cell functionality
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5790033/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29423397
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2018.00004
work_keys_str_mv AT strasslerelisabethtamara ageisrelativeimpactofdonorageoninducedpluripotentstemcellderivedcellfunctionality
AT aaltosetalakatriina ageisrelativeimpactofdonorageoninducedpluripotentstemcellderivedcellfunctionality
AT kiamehrmostafa ageisrelativeimpactofdonorageoninducedpluripotentstemcellderivedcellfunctionality
AT landmesserulf ageisrelativeimpactofdonorageoninducedpluripotentstemcellderivedcellfunctionality
AT krankelnicolle ageisrelativeimpactofdonorageoninducedpluripotentstemcellderivedcellfunctionality