Cargando…
Age Is Relative—Impact of Donor Age on Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cell Functionality
Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) avoid many of the restrictions that hamper the application of human embryonic stem cells: limited availability of source material due to legal restrictions in some countries, immunogenic rejection and ethical concerns. Also, the donor’s clinical phenotype is of...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5790033/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29423397 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2018.00004 |
_version_ | 1783296388850778112 |
---|---|
author | Strässler, Elisabeth Tamara Aalto-Setälä, Katriina Kiamehr, Mostafa Landmesser, Ulf Kränkel, Nicolle |
author_facet | Strässler, Elisabeth Tamara Aalto-Setälä, Katriina Kiamehr, Mostafa Landmesser, Ulf Kränkel, Nicolle |
author_sort | Strässler, Elisabeth Tamara |
collection | PubMed |
description | Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) avoid many of the restrictions that hamper the application of human embryonic stem cells: limited availability of source material due to legal restrictions in some countries, immunogenic rejection and ethical concerns. Also, the donor’s clinical phenotype is often known when working with iPSCs. Therefore, iPSCs seem ideal to tackle the two biggest tasks of regenerative medicine: degenerative diseases with genetic cause (e.g., Duchenne’s muscular dystrophy) and organ replacement in age-related diseases (e.g., end-stage heart or renal failure), especially in combination with recently developed gene-editing tools. In the setting of autologous transplantation in elderly patients, donor age becomes a potentially relevant factor that needs to be assessed. Here, we review and critically discuss available data pertinent to the questions: How does donor age influence the reprogramming process and iPSC functionality? Would it even be possible to reprogram senescent somatic cells? How does donor age affect iPSC differentiation into specialised cells and their functionality? We also identify research needs, which might help resolve current unknowns. Until recently, most hallmarks of ageing were attributed to an accumulation of DNA damage over time, and it was thus expected that DNA damage from a somatic cell would accumulate in iPSCs and the cells derived from them. In line with this, a decreased lifespan of cloned organisms compared with the donor was also observed in early cloning experiments. Therefore, it was questioned for a time whether iPSC derived from an old individual’s somatic cells would suffer from early senescence and, thus, may not be a viable option either for disease modelling nor future clinical applications. Instead, typical signs of cellular ageing are reverted in the process of iPSC reprogramming, and iPSCs from older donors do not show diminished differentiation potential nor do iPSC-derived cells from older donors suffer early senescence or show functional impairments when compared with those from younger donors. Thus, the data would suggest that donor age does not limit iPSC application for modelling genetic diseases nor regenerative therapies. However, open questions remain, e.g., regarding the potential tumourigenicity of iPSC-derived cells and the impact of epigenetic pattern retention. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5790033 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57900332018-02-08 Age Is Relative—Impact of Donor Age on Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cell Functionality Strässler, Elisabeth Tamara Aalto-Setälä, Katriina Kiamehr, Mostafa Landmesser, Ulf Kränkel, Nicolle Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) avoid many of the restrictions that hamper the application of human embryonic stem cells: limited availability of source material due to legal restrictions in some countries, immunogenic rejection and ethical concerns. Also, the donor’s clinical phenotype is often known when working with iPSCs. Therefore, iPSCs seem ideal to tackle the two biggest tasks of regenerative medicine: degenerative diseases with genetic cause (e.g., Duchenne’s muscular dystrophy) and organ replacement in age-related diseases (e.g., end-stage heart or renal failure), especially in combination with recently developed gene-editing tools. In the setting of autologous transplantation in elderly patients, donor age becomes a potentially relevant factor that needs to be assessed. Here, we review and critically discuss available data pertinent to the questions: How does donor age influence the reprogramming process and iPSC functionality? Would it even be possible to reprogram senescent somatic cells? How does donor age affect iPSC differentiation into specialised cells and their functionality? We also identify research needs, which might help resolve current unknowns. Until recently, most hallmarks of ageing were attributed to an accumulation of DNA damage over time, and it was thus expected that DNA damage from a somatic cell would accumulate in iPSCs and the cells derived from them. In line with this, a decreased lifespan of cloned organisms compared with the donor was also observed in early cloning experiments. Therefore, it was questioned for a time whether iPSC derived from an old individual’s somatic cells would suffer from early senescence and, thus, may not be a viable option either for disease modelling nor future clinical applications. Instead, typical signs of cellular ageing are reverted in the process of iPSC reprogramming, and iPSCs from older donors do not show diminished differentiation potential nor do iPSC-derived cells from older donors suffer early senescence or show functional impairments when compared with those from younger donors. Thus, the data would suggest that donor age does not limit iPSC application for modelling genetic diseases nor regenerative therapies. However, open questions remain, e.g., regarding the potential tumourigenicity of iPSC-derived cells and the impact of epigenetic pattern retention. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5790033/ /pubmed/29423397 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2018.00004 Text en Copyright © 2018 Strässler, Aalto-Setälä, Kiamehr, Landmesser and Kränkel. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Cardiovascular Medicine Strässler, Elisabeth Tamara Aalto-Setälä, Katriina Kiamehr, Mostafa Landmesser, Ulf Kränkel, Nicolle Age Is Relative—Impact of Donor Age on Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cell Functionality |
title | Age Is Relative—Impact of Donor Age on Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cell Functionality |
title_full | Age Is Relative—Impact of Donor Age on Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cell Functionality |
title_fullStr | Age Is Relative—Impact of Donor Age on Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cell Functionality |
title_full_unstemmed | Age Is Relative—Impact of Donor Age on Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cell Functionality |
title_short | Age Is Relative—Impact of Donor Age on Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cell Functionality |
title_sort | age is relative—impact of donor age on induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cell functionality |
topic | Cardiovascular Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5790033/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29423397 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2018.00004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT strasslerelisabethtamara ageisrelativeimpactofdonorageoninducedpluripotentstemcellderivedcellfunctionality AT aaltosetalakatriina ageisrelativeimpactofdonorageoninducedpluripotentstemcellderivedcellfunctionality AT kiamehrmostafa ageisrelativeimpactofdonorageoninducedpluripotentstemcellderivedcellfunctionality AT landmesserulf ageisrelativeimpactofdonorageoninducedpluripotentstemcellderivedcellfunctionality AT krankelnicolle ageisrelativeimpactofdonorageoninducedpluripotentstemcellderivedcellfunctionality |