Cargando…

Comparison of corneal biomechanics after myopic small-incision lenticule extraction compared to LASIK: an ex vivo study

PURPOSE: To investigate ex vivo potentially different corneal biomechanical properties after small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) versus LASIK for myopic correction. METHODS: Thirty human donor corneas were subjected to either myopic SMILE or femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK. Donor corneas we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Kanellopoulos, Anastasios John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5790083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29416315
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S153509
_version_ 1783296400225730560
author Kanellopoulos, Anastasios John
author_facet Kanellopoulos, Anastasios John
author_sort Kanellopoulos, Anastasios John
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To investigate ex vivo potentially different corneal biomechanical properties after small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) versus LASIK for myopic correction. METHODS: Thirty human donor corneas were subjected to either myopic SMILE or femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK. Donor corneas were assigned to six investigative groups: Group A, −3.00 D (diopters) SMILE; Group B, −8.00 D SMILE; Group C, −3.00 D LASIK; and Group D, −8.00 D LASIK. Additionally, two control groups were formed: Group E, SMILE and Group F, LASIK. All groups consisted of five corneas, randomly allocated. The corneas in the control groups were subjected to the corresponding femtosecond-laser lamellar cuts but not to tissue removal. Evaluation of biomechanical tensile strength was conducted by biaxial force application. Primary outcome measures were stress at 10% and 15% strain, and Young’s modulus at 10% and 15% strain. RESULTS: In SMILE, the average relative difference (Δ) of the four outcome measures was −34.46% for −3.00 D correction versus control Group E and −49.34% for −8.00 D correction versus control Group E. In LASIK, average Δ was −24.88% for −3.00 D correction versus control, and −52.73% for −8.00 D correction versus control. All these differences were statistically significant; SMILE compared to LASIK for the same myopic correction appears to result in more biomechanical reduction for −3.00 D corrections by −26%, while a nonstatistically significant difference was noted in −8.00 D corrections. CONCLUSION: Both SMILE and LASIK procedures do substantially alter corneal biomechanical properties, and the degree of tensile strength reduction is statistically significantly correlated to the extent of myopic correction. Additionally, SMILE procedure seems to result in more tensile strength reduction in lower myopic corrections compared to LASIK, and similar tensile strength reduction to LASIK in higher myopic corrections when compared to LASIK.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5790083
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57900832018-02-07 Comparison of corneal biomechanics after myopic small-incision lenticule extraction compared to LASIK: an ex vivo study Kanellopoulos, Anastasios John Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: To investigate ex vivo potentially different corneal biomechanical properties after small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) versus LASIK for myopic correction. METHODS: Thirty human donor corneas were subjected to either myopic SMILE or femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK. Donor corneas were assigned to six investigative groups: Group A, −3.00 D (diopters) SMILE; Group B, −8.00 D SMILE; Group C, −3.00 D LASIK; and Group D, −8.00 D LASIK. Additionally, two control groups were formed: Group E, SMILE and Group F, LASIK. All groups consisted of five corneas, randomly allocated. The corneas in the control groups were subjected to the corresponding femtosecond-laser lamellar cuts but not to tissue removal. Evaluation of biomechanical tensile strength was conducted by biaxial force application. Primary outcome measures were stress at 10% and 15% strain, and Young’s modulus at 10% and 15% strain. RESULTS: In SMILE, the average relative difference (Δ) of the four outcome measures was −34.46% for −3.00 D correction versus control Group E and −49.34% for −8.00 D correction versus control Group E. In LASIK, average Δ was −24.88% for −3.00 D correction versus control, and −52.73% for −8.00 D correction versus control. All these differences were statistically significant; SMILE compared to LASIK for the same myopic correction appears to result in more biomechanical reduction for −3.00 D corrections by −26%, while a nonstatistically significant difference was noted in −8.00 D corrections. CONCLUSION: Both SMILE and LASIK procedures do substantially alter corneal biomechanical properties, and the degree of tensile strength reduction is statistically significantly correlated to the extent of myopic correction. Additionally, SMILE procedure seems to result in more tensile strength reduction in lower myopic corrections compared to LASIK, and similar tensile strength reduction to LASIK in higher myopic corrections when compared to LASIK. Dove Medical Press 2018-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5790083/ /pubmed/29416315 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S153509 Text en © 2018 Kanellopoulos. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Kanellopoulos, Anastasios John
Comparison of corneal biomechanics after myopic small-incision lenticule extraction compared to LASIK: an ex vivo study
title Comparison of corneal biomechanics after myopic small-incision lenticule extraction compared to LASIK: an ex vivo study
title_full Comparison of corneal biomechanics after myopic small-incision lenticule extraction compared to LASIK: an ex vivo study
title_fullStr Comparison of corneal biomechanics after myopic small-incision lenticule extraction compared to LASIK: an ex vivo study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of corneal biomechanics after myopic small-incision lenticule extraction compared to LASIK: an ex vivo study
title_short Comparison of corneal biomechanics after myopic small-incision lenticule extraction compared to LASIK: an ex vivo study
title_sort comparison of corneal biomechanics after myopic small-incision lenticule extraction compared to lasik: an ex vivo study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5790083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29416315
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S153509
work_keys_str_mv AT kanellopoulosanastasiosjohn comparisonofcornealbiomechanicsaftermyopicsmallincisionlenticuleextractioncomparedtolasikanexvivostudy