Cargando…

Assessing the integrity of the cognitive processes involved in belief reasoning by means of two nonverbal tasks: Rationale, normative data collection and illustration with brain-damaged patients

Every day, we engage in social interactions with other people which require understanding their as well as our own mental states. Such capacity is commonly referred to as Theory of Mind (ToM). Disturbances of ToM are often reported in diverse pathologies which affect brain functioning and lead to pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Biervoye, Aurélie, Meert, Gaëlle, Apperly, Ian A., Samson, Dana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5790227/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29381730
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190295
_version_ 1783296416835174400
author Biervoye, Aurélie
Meert, Gaëlle
Apperly, Ian A.
Samson, Dana
author_facet Biervoye, Aurélie
Meert, Gaëlle
Apperly, Ian A.
Samson, Dana
author_sort Biervoye, Aurélie
collection PubMed
description Every day, we engage in social interactions with other people which require understanding their as well as our own mental states. Such capacity is commonly referred to as Theory of Mind (ToM). Disturbances of ToM are often reported in diverse pathologies which affect brain functioning and lead to problems in social interactions. Identifying ToM deficits is thus crucial to guide the clinicians in the establishment of adequate rehabilitation strategies for patients. Previous studies have demonstrated that ToM is not a unitary function yet currently there are very few standardized tests which allow identifying the type of cognitive processes affected when a patient exhibits a ToM deficit. In the current study, we present two belief reasoning tasks which have been used in previous research to disentangle two types of processes involved in belief reasoning: self-perspective inhibition and the spontaneous inference of another person’s belief. A three-step procedure was developed to provide clinicians with the tools to interpret the patients’ performances on the tasks. First, these tasks were standardized and normative data was collected on a sample of 124 healthy participants aged between 18 and 74. Data collected showed a decrease in performance as a function of age only in the task that loaded most in spontaneous other-perspective demands. There was however no effect of gender or educational level. Cut-off scores to identify deficits were then calculated for the different age groups separately. Secondly, the three-step procedure was applied to 21 brain-damaged patients and showed a large diversity of profiles, including selective deficits of the two targeted ToM processes. The diversity of profiles shows the importance to take into account the multiple facets of ToM during the diagnosis and rehabilitation of patients with suspected ToM deficits.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5790227
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57902272018-02-13 Assessing the integrity of the cognitive processes involved in belief reasoning by means of two nonverbal tasks: Rationale, normative data collection and illustration with brain-damaged patients Biervoye, Aurélie Meert, Gaëlle Apperly, Ian A. Samson, Dana PLoS One Research Article Every day, we engage in social interactions with other people which require understanding their as well as our own mental states. Such capacity is commonly referred to as Theory of Mind (ToM). Disturbances of ToM are often reported in diverse pathologies which affect brain functioning and lead to problems in social interactions. Identifying ToM deficits is thus crucial to guide the clinicians in the establishment of adequate rehabilitation strategies for patients. Previous studies have demonstrated that ToM is not a unitary function yet currently there are very few standardized tests which allow identifying the type of cognitive processes affected when a patient exhibits a ToM deficit. In the current study, we present two belief reasoning tasks which have been used in previous research to disentangle two types of processes involved in belief reasoning: self-perspective inhibition and the spontaneous inference of another person’s belief. A three-step procedure was developed to provide clinicians with the tools to interpret the patients’ performances on the tasks. First, these tasks were standardized and normative data was collected on a sample of 124 healthy participants aged between 18 and 74. Data collected showed a decrease in performance as a function of age only in the task that loaded most in spontaneous other-perspective demands. There was however no effect of gender or educational level. Cut-off scores to identify deficits were then calculated for the different age groups separately. Secondly, the three-step procedure was applied to 21 brain-damaged patients and showed a large diversity of profiles, including selective deficits of the two targeted ToM processes. The diversity of profiles shows the importance to take into account the multiple facets of ToM during the diagnosis and rehabilitation of patients with suspected ToM deficits. Public Library of Science 2018-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5790227/ /pubmed/29381730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190295 Text en © 2018 Biervoye et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Biervoye, Aurélie
Meert, Gaëlle
Apperly, Ian A.
Samson, Dana
Assessing the integrity of the cognitive processes involved in belief reasoning by means of two nonverbal tasks: Rationale, normative data collection and illustration with brain-damaged patients
title Assessing the integrity of the cognitive processes involved in belief reasoning by means of two nonverbal tasks: Rationale, normative data collection and illustration with brain-damaged patients
title_full Assessing the integrity of the cognitive processes involved in belief reasoning by means of two nonverbal tasks: Rationale, normative data collection and illustration with brain-damaged patients
title_fullStr Assessing the integrity of the cognitive processes involved in belief reasoning by means of two nonverbal tasks: Rationale, normative data collection and illustration with brain-damaged patients
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the integrity of the cognitive processes involved in belief reasoning by means of two nonverbal tasks: Rationale, normative data collection and illustration with brain-damaged patients
title_short Assessing the integrity of the cognitive processes involved in belief reasoning by means of two nonverbal tasks: Rationale, normative data collection and illustration with brain-damaged patients
title_sort assessing the integrity of the cognitive processes involved in belief reasoning by means of two nonverbal tasks: rationale, normative data collection and illustration with brain-damaged patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5790227/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29381730
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190295
work_keys_str_mv AT biervoyeaurelie assessingtheintegrityofthecognitiveprocessesinvolvedinbeliefreasoningbymeansoftwononverbaltasksrationalenormativedatacollectionandillustrationwithbraindamagedpatients
AT meertgaelle assessingtheintegrityofthecognitiveprocessesinvolvedinbeliefreasoningbymeansoftwononverbaltasksrationalenormativedatacollectionandillustrationwithbraindamagedpatients
AT apperlyiana assessingtheintegrityofthecognitiveprocessesinvolvedinbeliefreasoningbymeansoftwononverbaltasksrationalenormativedatacollectionandillustrationwithbraindamagedpatients
AT samsondana assessingtheintegrityofthecognitiveprocessesinvolvedinbeliefreasoningbymeansoftwononverbaltasksrationalenormativedatacollectionandillustrationwithbraindamagedpatients