Cargando…
Can biosecurity and local network properties predict pathogen species richness in the salmonid industry?
Salmonid farming in Ireland is mostly organic, which implies limited disease treatment options. This highlights the importance of biosecurity for preventing the introduction and spread of infectious agents. Similarly, the effect of local network properties on infection spread processes has rarely be...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5790274/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29381760 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191680 |
_version_ | 1783296427865145344 |
---|---|
author | Yatabe, Tadaishi More, Simon J. Geoghegan, Fiona McManus, Catherine Hill, Ashley E. Martínez-López, Beatriz |
author_facet | Yatabe, Tadaishi More, Simon J. Geoghegan, Fiona McManus, Catherine Hill, Ashley E. Martínez-López, Beatriz |
author_sort | Yatabe, Tadaishi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Salmonid farming in Ireland is mostly organic, which implies limited disease treatment options. This highlights the importance of biosecurity for preventing the introduction and spread of infectious agents. Similarly, the effect of local network properties on infection spread processes has rarely been evaluated. In this paper, we characterized the biosecurity of salmonid farms in Ireland using a survey, and then developed a score for benchmarking the disease risk of salmonid farms. The usefulness and validity of this score, together with farm indegree (dichotomized as ≤ 1 or > 1), were assessed through generalized Poisson regression models, in which the modeled outcome was pathogen richness, defined here as the number of different diseases affecting a farm during a year. Seawater salmon (SW salmon) farms had the highest biosecurity scores with a median (interquartile range) of 82.3 (5.4), followed by freshwater salmon (FW salmon) with 75.2 (8.2), and freshwater trout (FW trout) farms with 74.8 (4.5). For FW salmon and trout farms, the top ranked model (in terms of leave-one-out information criteria, looic) was the null model (looic = 46.1). For SW salmon farms, the best ranking model was the full model with both predictors and their interaction (looic = 33.3). Farms with a higher biosecurity score were associated with lower pathogen richness, and farms with indegree > 1 (i.e. more than one fish supplier) were associated with increased pathogen richness. The effect of the interaction between these variables was also important, showing an antagonistic effect. This would indicate that biosecurity effectiveness is achieved through a broader perspective on the subject, which includes a minimization in the number of suppliers and hence in the possibilities for infection to enter a farm. The work presented here could be used to elaborate indicators of a farm’s disease risk based on its biosecurity score and indegree, to inform risk-based disease surveillance and control strategies for private and public stakeholders. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5790274 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57902742018-02-13 Can biosecurity and local network properties predict pathogen species richness in the salmonid industry? Yatabe, Tadaishi More, Simon J. Geoghegan, Fiona McManus, Catherine Hill, Ashley E. Martínez-López, Beatriz PLoS One Research Article Salmonid farming in Ireland is mostly organic, which implies limited disease treatment options. This highlights the importance of biosecurity for preventing the introduction and spread of infectious agents. Similarly, the effect of local network properties on infection spread processes has rarely been evaluated. In this paper, we characterized the biosecurity of salmonid farms in Ireland using a survey, and then developed a score for benchmarking the disease risk of salmonid farms. The usefulness and validity of this score, together with farm indegree (dichotomized as ≤ 1 or > 1), were assessed through generalized Poisson regression models, in which the modeled outcome was pathogen richness, defined here as the number of different diseases affecting a farm during a year. Seawater salmon (SW salmon) farms had the highest biosecurity scores with a median (interquartile range) of 82.3 (5.4), followed by freshwater salmon (FW salmon) with 75.2 (8.2), and freshwater trout (FW trout) farms with 74.8 (4.5). For FW salmon and trout farms, the top ranked model (in terms of leave-one-out information criteria, looic) was the null model (looic = 46.1). For SW salmon farms, the best ranking model was the full model with both predictors and their interaction (looic = 33.3). Farms with a higher biosecurity score were associated with lower pathogen richness, and farms with indegree > 1 (i.e. more than one fish supplier) were associated with increased pathogen richness. The effect of the interaction between these variables was also important, showing an antagonistic effect. This would indicate that biosecurity effectiveness is achieved through a broader perspective on the subject, which includes a minimization in the number of suppliers and hence in the possibilities for infection to enter a farm. The work presented here could be used to elaborate indicators of a farm’s disease risk based on its biosecurity score and indegree, to inform risk-based disease surveillance and control strategies for private and public stakeholders. Public Library of Science 2018-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5790274/ /pubmed/29381760 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191680 Text en © 2018 Yatabe et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Yatabe, Tadaishi More, Simon J. Geoghegan, Fiona McManus, Catherine Hill, Ashley E. Martínez-López, Beatriz Can biosecurity and local network properties predict pathogen species richness in the salmonid industry? |
title | Can biosecurity and local network properties predict pathogen species richness in the salmonid industry? |
title_full | Can biosecurity and local network properties predict pathogen species richness in the salmonid industry? |
title_fullStr | Can biosecurity and local network properties predict pathogen species richness in the salmonid industry? |
title_full_unstemmed | Can biosecurity and local network properties predict pathogen species richness in the salmonid industry? |
title_short | Can biosecurity and local network properties predict pathogen species richness in the salmonid industry? |
title_sort | can biosecurity and local network properties predict pathogen species richness in the salmonid industry? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5790274/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29381760 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191680 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yatabetadaishi canbiosecurityandlocalnetworkpropertiespredictpathogenspeciesrichnessinthesalmonidindustry AT moresimonj canbiosecurityandlocalnetworkpropertiespredictpathogenspeciesrichnessinthesalmonidindustry AT geogheganfiona canbiosecurityandlocalnetworkpropertiespredictpathogenspeciesrichnessinthesalmonidindustry AT mcmanuscatherine canbiosecurityandlocalnetworkpropertiespredictpathogenspeciesrichnessinthesalmonidindustry AT hillashleye canbiosecurityandlocalnetworkpropertiespredictpathogenspeciesrichnessinthesalmonidindustry AT martinezlopezbeatriz canbiosecurityandlocalnetworkpropertiespredictpathogenspeciesrichnessinthesalmonidindustry |