Cargando…

Assessment of Cochlear Function during Cochlear Implantation by Extra- and Intracochlear Electrocochleography

Objective: The aims of this study were: (1) To investigate the correlation between electrophysiological changes during cochlear implantation and postoperative hearing loss, and (2) to detect the time points that electrophysiological changes occur during cochlear implantation. Material and Methods: E...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dalbert, Adrian, Pfiffner, Flurin, Hoesli, Marco, Koka, Kanthaiah, Veraguth, Dorothe, Roosli, Christof, Huber, Alexander
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5790789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29434534
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00018
_version_ 1783296511439798272
author Dalbert, Adrian
Pfiffner, Flurin
Hoesli, Marco
Koka, Kanthaiah
Veraguth, Dorothe
Roosli, Christof
Huber, Alexander
author_facet Dalbert, Adrian
Pfiffner, Flurin
Hoesli, Marco
Koka, Kanthaiah
Veraguth, Dorothe
Roosli, Christof
Huber, Alexander
author_sort Dalbert, Adrian
collection PubMed
description Objective: The aims of this study were: (1) To investigate the correlation between electrophysiological changes during cochlear implantation and postoperative hearing loss, and (2) to detect the time points that electrophysiological changes occur during cochlear implantation. Material and Methods: Extra- and intracochlear electrocochleography (ECoG) were used to detect electrophysiological changes during cochlear implantation. Extracochlear ECoG recordings were conducted through a needle electrode placed on the promontory; for intracochlear ECoG recordings, the most apical contact of the cochlear implant (CI) electrode itself was used as the recording electrode. Tone bursts at 250, 500, 750, and 1000 Hz were used as low-frequency acoustic stimuli and clicks as high-frequency acoustic stimuli. Changes of extracochlear ECoG recordings after full insertion of the CI electrode were correlated with pure-tone audiometric findings 4 weeks after surgery. Results: Changes in extracochlear ECoG recordings correlated with postoperative hearing change (r = −0.44, p = 0.055, n = 20). Mean hearing loss in subjects without decrease or loss of extracochlear ECoG signals was 12 dB, compared to a mean hearing loss of 22 dB in subjects with a detectable decrease or a loss of ECoG signals (p = 0.0058, n = 51). In extracochlear ECoG recordings, a mean increase of the ECoG signal of 4.4 dB occurred after opening the cochlea. If a decrease of ECoG signals occurred during insertion of the CI electrode, the decrease was detectable during the second half of the insertion. Conclusion: ECoG recordings allow detection of electrophysiological changes in the cochlea during cochlear implantation. Decrease of extracochlear ECoG recordings during surgery has a significant correlation with hearing loss 4 weeks after surgery. Trauma to cochlear structures seems to occur during the final phase of the CI electrode insertion. Baseline recordings for extracochlear ECoG recordings should be conducted after opening the cochlea. ECoG responses can be recorded from an intracochlear site using the CI electrode as recording electrode. This technique may prove useful for monitoring cochlear trauma intraoperatively in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5790789
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57907892018-02-12 Assessment of Cochlear Function during Cochlear Implantation by Extra- and Intracochlear Electrocochleography Dalbert, Adrian Pfiffner, Flurin Hoesli, Marco Koka, Kanthaiah Veraguth, Dorothe Roosli, Christof Huber, Alexander Front Neurosci Neuroscience Objective: The aims of this study were: (1) To investigate the correlation between electrophysiological changes during cochlear implantation and postoperative hearing loss, and (2) to detect the time points that electrophysiological changes occur during cochlear implantation. Material and Methods: Extra- and intracochlear electrocochleography (ECoG) were used to detect electrophysiological changes during cochlear implantation. Extracochlear ECoG recordings were conducted through a needle electrode placed on the promontory; for intracochlear ECoG recordings, the most apical contact of the cochlear implant (CI) electrode itself was used as the recording electrode. Tone bursts at 250, 500, 750, and 1000 Hz were used as low-frequency acoustic stimuli and clicks as high-frequency acoustic stimuli. Changes of extracochlear ECoG recordings after full insertion of the CI electrode were correlated with pure-tone audiometric findings 4 weeks after surgery. Results: Changes in extracochlear ECoG recordings correlated with postoperative hearing change (r = −0.44, p = 0.055, n = 20). Mean hearing loss in subjects without decrease or loss of extracochlear ECoG signals was 12 dB, compared to a mean hearing loss of 22 dB in subjects with a detectable decrease or a loss of ECoG signals (p = 0.0058, n = 51). In extracochlear ECoG recordings, a mean increase of the ECoG signal of 4.4 dB occurred after opening the cochlea. If a decrease of ECoG signals occurred during insertion of the CI electrode, the decrease was detectable during the second half of the insertion. Conclusion: ECoG recordings allow detection of electrophysiological changes in the cochlea during cochlear implantation. Decrease of extracochlear ECoG recordings during surgery has a significant correlation with hearing loss 4 weeks after surgery. Trauma to cochlear structures seems to occur during the final phase of the CI electrode insertion. Baseline recordings for extracochlear ECoG recordings should be conducted after opening the cochlea. ECoG responses can be recorded from an intracochlear site using the CI electrode as recording electrode. This technique may prove useful for monitoring cochlear trauma intraoperatively in the future. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5790789/ /pubmed/29434534 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00018 Text en Copyright © 2018 Dalbert, Pfiffner, Hoesli, Koka, Veraguth, Roosli and Huber. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Dalbert, Adrian
Pfiffner, Flurin
Hoesli, Marco
Koka, Kanthaiah
Veraguth, Dorothe
Roosli, Christof
Huber, Alexander
Assessment of Cochlear Function during Cochlear Implantation by Extra- and Intracochlear Electrocochleography
title Assessment of Cochlear Function during Cochlear Implantation by Extra- and Intracochlear Electrocochleography
title_full Assessment of Cochlear Function during Cochlear Implantation by Extra- and Intracochlear Electrocochleography
title_fullStr Assessment of Cochlear Function during Cochlear Implantation by Extra- and Intracochlear Electrocochleography
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Cochlear Function during Cochlear Implantation by Extra- and Intracochlear Electrocochleography
title_short Assessment of Cochlear Function during Cochlear Implantation by Extra- and Intracochlear Electrocochleography
title_sort assessment of cochlear function during cochlear implantation by extra- and intracochlear electrocochleography
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5790789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29434534
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00018
work_keys_str_mv AT dalbertadrian assessmentofcochlearfunctionduringcochlearimplantationbyextraandintracochlearelectrocochleography
AT pfiffnerflurin assessmentofcochlearfunctionduringcochlearimplantationbyextraandintracochlearelectrocochleography
AT hoeslimarco assessmentofcochlearfunctionduringcochlearimplantationbyextraandintracochlearelectrocochleography
AT kokakanthaiah assessmentofcochlearfunctionduringcochlearimplantationbyextraandintracochlearelectrocochleography
AT veraguthdorothe assessmentofcochlearfunctionduringcochlearimplantationbyextraandintracochlearelectrocochleography
AT rooslichristof assessmentofcochlearfunctionduringcochlearimplantationbyextraandintracochlearelectrocochleography
AT huberalexander assessmentofcochlearfunctionduringcochlearimplantationbyextraandintracochlearelectrocochleography