Cargando…
Do you see what I see? Mobile eye-tracker contextual analysis and inter-rater reliability
Mobile eye-trackers are currently used during real-world tasks (e.g. gait) to monitor visual and cognitive processes, particularly in ageing and Parkinson’s disease (PD). However, contextual analysis involving fixation locations during such tasks is rarely performed due to its complexity. This study...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5790862/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28712014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11517-017-1669-z |
_version_ | 1783296525835698176 |
---|---|
author | Stuart, S. Hunt, D. Nell, J. Godfrey, A. Hausdorff, J. M. Rochester, L. Alcock, L. |
author_facet | Stuart, S. Hunt, D. Nell, J. Godfrey, A. Hausdorff, J. M. Rochester, L. Alcock, L. |
author_sort | Stuart, S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Mobile eye-trackers are currently used during real-world tasks (e.g. gait) to monitor visual and cognitive processes, particularly in ageing and Parkinson’s disease (PD). However, contextual analysis involving fixation locations during such tasks is rarely performed due to its complexity. This study adapted a validated algorithm and developed a classification method to semi-automate contextual analysis of mobile eye-tracking data. We further assessed inter-rater reliability of the proposed classification method. A mobile eye-tracker recorded eye-movements during walking in five healthy older adult controls (HC) and five people with PD. Fixations were identified using a previously validated algorithm, which was adapted to provide still images of fixation locations (n = 116). The fixation location was manually identified by two raters (DH, JN), who classified the locations. Cohen’s kappa correlation coefficients determined the inter-rater reliability. The algorithm successfully provided still images for each fixation, allowing manual contextual analysis to be performed. The inter-rater reliability for classifying the fixation location was high for both PD (kappa = 0.80, 95% agreement) and HC groups (kappa = 0.80, 91% agreement), which indicated a reliable classification method. This study developed a reliable semi-automated contextual analysis method for gait studies in HC and PD. Future studies could adapt this methodology for various gait-related eye-tracking studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5790862 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57908622018-02-05 Do you see what I see? Mobile eye-tracker contextual analysis and inter-rater reliability Stuart, S. Hunt, D. Nell, J. Godfrey, A. Hausdorff, J. M. Rochester, L. Alcock, L. Med Biol Eng Comput Original Article Mobile eye-trackers are currently used during real-world tasks (e.g. gait) to monitor visual and cognitive processes, particularly in ageing and Parkinson’s disease (PD). However, contextual analysis involving fixation locations during such tasks is rarely performed due to its complexity. This study adapted a validated algorithm and developed a classification method to semi-automate contextual analysis of mobile eye-tracking data. We further assessed inter-rater reliability of the proposed classification method. A mobile eye-tracker recorded eye-movements during walking in five healthy older adult controls (HC) and five people with PD. Fixations were identified using a previously validated algorithm, which was adapted to provide still images of fixation locations (n = 116). The fixation location was manually identified by two raters (DH, JN), who classified the locations. Cohen’s kappa correlation coefficients determined the inter-rater reliability. The algorithm successfully provided still images for each fixation, allowing manual contextual analysis to be performed. The inter-rater reliability for classifying the fixation location was high for both PD (kappa = 0.80, 95% agreement) and HC groups (kappa = 0.80, 91% agreement), which indicated a reliable classification method. This study developed a reliable semi-automated contextual analysis method for gait studies in HC and PD. Future studies could adapt this methodology for various gait-related eye-tracking studies. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-07-15 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5790862/ /pubmed/28712014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11517-017-1669-z Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Stuart, S. Hunt, D. Nell, J. Godfrey, A. Hausdorff, J. M. Rochester, L. Alcock, L. Do you see what I see? Mobile eye-tracker contextual analysis and inter-rater reliability |
title | Do you see what I see? Mobile eye-tracker contextual analysis and inter-rater reliability |
title_full | Do you see what I see? Mobile eye-tracker contextual analysis and inter-rater reliability |
title_fullStr | Do you see what I see? Mobile eye-tracker contextual analysis and inter-rater reliability |
title_full_unstemmed | Do you see what I see? Mobile eye-tracker contextual analysis and inter-rater reliability |
title_short | Do you see what I see? Mobile eye-tracker contextual analysis and inter-rater reliability |
title_sort | do you see what i see? mobile eye-tracker contextual analysis and inter-rater reliability |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5790862/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28712014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11517-017-1669-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stuarts doyouseewhatiseemobileeyetrackercontextualanalysisandinterraterreliability AT huntd doyouseewhatiseemobileeyetrackercontextualanalysisandinterraterreliability AT nellj doyouseewhatiseemobileeyetrackercontextualanalysisandinterraterreliability AT godfreya doyouseewhatiseemobileeyetrackercontextualanalysisandinterraterreliability AT hausdorffjm doyouseewhatiseemobileeyetrackercontextualanalysisandinterraterreliability AT rochesterl doyouseewhatiseemobileeyetrackercontextualanalysisandinterraterreliability AT alcockl doyouseewhatiseemobileeyetrackercontextualanalysisandinterraterreliability |