Cargando…
Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings—paper 4: how to assess coherence
BACKGROUND: The GRADE-CERQual (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation-Confidence in Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research) approach has been developed by the GRADE working group. The approach has been developed to support the use of findings from qualitative eviden...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5791039/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29384081 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0691-8 |
_version_ | 1783296557389447168 |
---|---|
author | Colvin, Christopher J. Garside, Ruth Wainwright, Megan Munthe-Kaas, Heather Glenton, Claire Bohren, Meghan A. Carlsen, Benedicte Tunçalp, Özge Noyes, Jane Booth, Andrew Rashidian, Arash Flottorp, Signe Lewin, Simon |
author_facet | Colvin, Christopher J. Garside, Ruth Wainwright, Megan Munthe-Kaas, Heather Glenton, Claire Bohren, Meghan A. Carlsen, Benedicte Tunçalp, Özge Noyes, Jane Booth, Andrew Rashidian, Arash Flottorp, Signe Lewin, Simon |
author_sort | Colvin, Christopher J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The GRADE-CERQual (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation-Confidence in Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research) approach has been developed by the GRADE working group. The approach has been developed to support the use of findings from qualitative evidence syntheses in decision-making, including guideline development and policy formulation. CERQual includes four components for assessing how much confidence to place in findings from reviews of qualitative research (also referred to as qualitative evidence syntheses): (1) methodological limitations, (2) relevance, (3) coherence and (4) adequacy of data. This paper is part of a series providing guidance on how to apply CERQual and focuses on CERQual’s coherence component. METHODS: We developed the coherence component by searching the literature for definitions, gathering feedback from relevant research communities and developing consensus through project group meetings. We tested the CERQual coherence component within several qualitative evidence syntheses before agreeing on the current definition and principles for application. RESULTS: When applying CERQual, we define coherence as how clear and cogent the fit is between the data from the primary studies and a review finding that synthesises that data. In this paper, we describe the coherence component and its rationale and offer guidance on how to assess coherence in the context of a review finding as part of the CERQual approach. This guidance outlines the information required to assess coherence, the steps that need to be taken to assess coherence and examples of coherence assessments. CONCLUSIONS: This paper provides guidance for review authors and others on undertaking an assessment of coherence in the context of the CERQual approach. We suggest that threats to coherence may arise when the data supporting a review finding are contradictory, ambiguous or incomplete or where competing theories exist that could be used to synthesise the data. We expect the CERQual approach, and its individual components, to develop further as our experiences with the practical implementation of the approach increase. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13012-017-0691-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5791039 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57910392018-02-08 Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings—paper 4: how to assess coherence Colvin, Christopher J. Garside, Ruth Wainwright, Megan Munthe-Kaas, Heather Glenton, Claire Bohren, Meghan A. Carlsen, Benedicte Tunçalp, Özge Noyes, Jane Booth, Andrew Rashidian, Arash Flottorp, Signe Lewin, Simon Implement Sci Method BACKGROUND: The GRADE-CERQual (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation-Confidence in Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research) approach has been developed by the GRADE working group. The approach has been developed to support the use of findings from qualitative evidence syntheses in decision-making, including guideline development and policy formulation. CERQual includes four components for assessing how much confidence to place in findings from reviews of qualitative research (also referred to as qualitative evidence syntheses): (1) methodological limitations, (2) relevance, (3) coherence and (4) adequacy of data. This paper is part of a series providing guidance on how to apply CERQual and focuses on CERQual’s coherence component. METHODS: We developed the coherence component by searching the literature for definitions, gathering feedback from relevant research communities and developing consensus through project group meetings. We tested the CERQual coherence component within several qualitative evidence syntheses before agreeing on the current definition and principles for application. RESULTS: When applying CERQual, we define coherence as how clear and cogent the fit is between the data from the primary studies and a review finding that synthesises that data. In this paper, we describe the coherence component and its rationale and offer guidance on how to assess coherence in the context of a review finding as part of the CERQual approach. This guidance outlines the information required to assess coherence, the steps that need to be taken to assess coherence and examples of coherence assessments. CONCLUSIONS: This paper provides guidance for review authors and others on undertaking an assessment of coherence in the context of the CERQual approach. We suggest that threats to coherence may arise when the data supporting a review finding are contradictory, ambiguous or incomplete or where competing theories exist that could be used to synthesise the data. We expect the CERQual approach, and its individual components, to develop further as our experiences with the practical implementation of the approach increase. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13012-017-0691-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5791039/ /pubmed/29384081 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0691-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Method Colvin, Christopher J. Garside, Ruth Wainwright, Megan Munthe-Kaas, Heather Glenton, Claire Bohren, Meghan A. Carlsen, Benedicte Tunçalp, Özge Noyes, Jane Booth, Andrew Rashidian, Arash Flottorp, Signe Lewin, Simon Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings—paper 4: how to assess coherence |
title | Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings—paper 4: how to assess coherence |
title_full | Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings—paper 4: how to assess coherence |
title_fullStr | Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings—paper 4: how to assess coherence |
title_full_unstemmed | Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings—paper 4: how to assess coherence |
title_short | Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings—paper 4: how to assess coherence |
title_sort | applying grade-cerqual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings—paper 4: how to assess coherence |
topic | Method |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5791039/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29384081 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0691-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT colvinchristopherj applyinggradecerqualtoqualitativeevidencesynthesisfindingspaper4howtoassesscoherence AT garsideruth applyinggradecerqualtoqualitativeevidencesynthesisfindingspaper4howtoassesscoherence AT wainwrightmegan applyinggradecerqualtoqualitativeevidencesynthesisfindingspaper4howtoassesscoherence AT munthekaasheather applyinggradecerqualtoqualitativeevidencesynthesisfindingspaper4howtoassesscoherence AT glentonclaire applyinggradecerqualtoqualitativeevidencesynthesisfindingspaper4howtoassesscoherence AT bohrenmeghana applyinggradecerqualtoqualitativeevidencesynthesisfindingspaper4howtoassesscoherence AT carlsenbenedicte applyinggradecerqualtoqualitativeevidencesynthesisfindingspaper4howtoassesscoherence AT tuncalpozge applyinggradecerqualtoqualitativeevidencesynthesisfindingspaper4howtoassesscoherence AT noyesjane applyinggradecerqualtoqualitativeevidencesynthesisfindingspaper4howtoassesscoherence AT boothandrew applyinggradecerqualtoqualitativeevidencesynthesisfindingspaper4howtoassesscoherence AT rashidianarash applyinggradecerqualtoqualitativeevidencesynthesisfindingspaper4howtoassesscoherence AT flottorpsigne applyinggradecerqualtoqualitativeevidencesynthesisfindingspaper4howtoassesscoherence AT lewinsimon applyinggradecerqualtoqualitativeevidencesynthesisfindingspaper4howtoassesscoherence |