Cargando…

Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings—paper 4: how to assess coherence

BACKGROUND: The GRADE-CERQual (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation-Confidence in Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research) approach has been developed by the GRADE working group. The approach has been developed to support the use of findings from qualitative eviden...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Colvin, Christopher J., Garside, Ruth, Wainwright, Megan, Munthe-Kaas, Heather, Glenton, Claire, Bohren, Meghan A., Carlsen, Benedicte, Tunçalp, Özge, Noyes, Jane, Booth, Andrew, Rashidian, Arash, Flottorp, Signe, Lewin, Simon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5791039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29384081
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0691-8
_version_ 1783296557389447168
author Colvin, Christopher J.
Garside, Ruth
Wainwright, Megan
Munthe-Kaas, Heather
Glenton, Claire
Bohren, Meghan A.
Carlsen, Benedicte
Tunçalp, Özge
Noyes, Jane
Booth, Andrew
Rashidian, Arash
Flottorp, Signe
Lewin, Simon
author_facet Colvin, Christopher J.
Garside, Ruth
Wainwright, Megan
Munthe-Kaas, Heather
Glenton, Claire
Bohren, Meghan A.
Carlsen, Benedicte
Tunçalp, Özge
Noyes, Jane
Booth, Andrew
Rashidian, Arash
Flottorp, Signe
Lewin, Simon
author_sort Colvin, Christopher J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The GRADE-CERQual (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation-Confidence in Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research) approach has been developed by the GRADE working group. The approach has been developed to support the use of findings from qualitative evidence syntheses in decision-making, including guideline development and policy formulation. CERQual includes four components for assessing how much confidence to place in findings from reviews of qualitative research (also referred to as qualitative evidence syntheses): (1) methodological limitations, (2) relevance, (3) coherence and (4) adequacy of data. This paper is part of a series providing guidance on how to apply CERQual and focuses on CERQual’s coherence component. METHODS: We developed the coherence component by searching the literature for definitions, gathering feedback from relevant research communities and developing consensus through project group meetings. We tested the CERQual coherence component within several qualitative evidence syntheses before agreeing on the current definition and principles for application. RESULTS: When applying CERQual, we define coherence as how clear and cogent the fit is between the data from the primary studies and a review finding that synthesises that data. In this paper, we describe the coherence component and its rationale and offer guidance on how to assess coherence in the context of a review finding as part of the CERQual approach. This guidance outlines the information required to assess coherence, the steps that need to be taken to assess coherence and examples of coherence assessments. CONCLUSIONS: This paper provides guidance for review authors and others on undertaking an assessment of coherence in the context of the CERQual approach. We suggest that threats to coherence may arise when the data supporting a review finding are contradictory, ambiguous or incomplete or where competing theories exist that could be used to synthesise the data. We expect the CERQual approach, and its individual components, to develop further as our experiences with the practical implementation of the approach increase. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13012-017-0691-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5791039
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57910392018-02-08 Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings—paper 4: how to assess coherence Colvin, Christopher J. Garside, Ruth Wainwright, Megan Munthe-Kaas, Heather Glenton, Claire Bohren, Meghan A. Carlsen, Benedicte Tunçalp, Özge Noyes, Jane Booth, Andrew Rashidian, Arash Flottorp, Signe Lewin, Simon Implement Sci Method BACKGROUND: The GRADE-CERQual (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation-Confidence in Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research) approach has been developed by the GRADE working group. The approach has been developed to support the use of findings from qualitative evidence syntheses in decision-making, including guideline development and policy formulation. CERQual includes four components for assessing how much confidence to place in findings from reviews of qualitative research (also referred to as qualitative evidence syntheses): (1) methodological limitations, (2) relevance, (3) coherence and (4) adequacy of data. This paper is part of a series providing guidance on how to apply CERQual and focuses on CERQual’s coherence component. METHODS: We developed the coherence component by searching the literature for definitions, gathering feedback from relevant research communities and developing consensus through project group meetings. We tested the CERQual coherence component within several qualitative evidence syntheses before agreeing on the current definition and principles for application. RESULTS: When applying CERQual, we define coherence as how clear and cogent the fit is between the data from the primary studies and a review finding that synthesises that data. In this paper, we describe the coherence component and its rationale and offer guidance on how to assess coherence in the context of a review finding as part of the CERQual approach. This guidance outlines the information required to assess coherence, the steps that need to be taken to assess coherence and examples of coherence assessments. CONCLUSIONS: This paper provides guidance for review authors and others on undertaking an assessment of coherence in the context of the CERQual approach. We suggest that threats to coherence may arise when the data supporting a review finding are contradictory, ambiguous or incomplete or where competing theories exist that could be used to synthesise the data. We expect the CERQual approach, and its individual components, to develop further as our experiences with the practical implementation of the approach increase. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13012-017-0691-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5791039/ /pubmed/29384081 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0691-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Method
Colvin, Christopher J.
Garside, Ruth
Wainwright, Megan
Munthe-Kaas, Heather
Glenton, Claire
Bohren, Meghan A.
Carlsen, Benedicte
Tunçalp, Özge
Noyes, Jane
Booth, Andrew
Rashidian, Arash
Flottorp, Signe
Lewin, Simon
Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings—paper 4: how to assess coherence
title Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings—paper 4: how to assess coherence
title_full Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings—paper 4: how to assess coherence
title_fullStr Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings—paper 4: how to assess coherence
title_full_unstemmed Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings—paper 4: how to assess coherence
title_short Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings—paper 4: how to assess coherence
title_sort applying grade-cerqual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings—paper 4: how to assess coherence
topic Method
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5791039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29384081
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0691-8
work_keys_str_mv AT colvinchristopherj applyinggradecerqualtoqualitativeevidencesynthesisfindingspaper4howtoassesscoherence
AT garsideruth applyinggradecerqualtoqualitativeevidencesynthesisfindingspaper4howtoassesscoherence
AT wainwrightmegan applyinggradecerqualtoqualitativeevidencesynthesisfindingspaper4howtoassesscoherence
AT munthekaasheather applyinggradecerqualtoqualitativeevidencesynthesisfindingspaper4howtoassesscoherence
AT glentonclaire applyinggradecerqualtoqualitativeevidencesynthesisfindingspaper4howtoassesscoherence
AT bohrenmeghana applyinggradecerqualtoqualitativeevidencesynthesisfindingspaper4howtoassesscoherence
AT carlsenbenedicte applyinggradecerqualtoqualitativeevidencesynthesisfindingspaper4howtoassesscoherence
AT tuncalpozge applyinggradecerqualtoqualitativeevidencesynthesisfindingspaper4howtoassesscoherence
AT noyesjane applyinggradecerqualtoqualitativeevidencesynthesisfindingspaper4howtoassesscoherence
AT boothandrew applyinggradecerqualtoqualitativeevidencesynthesisfindingspaper4howtoassesscoherence
AT rashidianarash applyinggradecerqualtoqualitativeevidencesynthesisfindingspaper4howtoassesscoherence
AT flottorpsigne applyinggradecerqualtoqualitativeevidencesynthesisfindingspaper4howtoassesscoherence
AT lewinsimon applyinggradecerqualtoqualitativeevidencesynthesisfindingspaper4howtoassesscoherence