Cargando…

Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings—paper 2: how to make an overall CERQual assessment of confidence and create a Summary of Qualitative Findings table

BACKGROUND: The GRADE-CERQual (Confidence in Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research) approach has been developed by the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) Working Group. The approach has been developed to support the use of findings from qualitative evid...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lewin, Simon, Bohren, Meghan, Rashidian, Arash, Munthe-Kaas, Heather, Glenton, Claire, Colvin, Christopher J., Garside, Ruth, Noyes, Jane, Booth, Andrew, Tunçalp, Özge, Wainwright, Megan, Flottorp, Signe, Tucker, Joseph D., Carlsen, Benedicte
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5791047/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29384082
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0689-2
_version_ 1783296559354478592
author Lewin, Simon
Bohren, Meghan
Rashidian, Arash
Munthe-Kaas, Heather
Glenton, Claire
Colvin, Christopher J.
Garside, Ruth
Noyes, Jane
Booth, Andrew
Tunçalp, Özge
Wainwright, Megan
Flottorp, Signe
Tucker, Joseph D.
Carlsen, Benedicte
author_facet Lewin, Simon
Bohren, Meghan
Rashidian, Arash
Munthe-Kaas, Heather
Glenton, Claire
Colvin, Christopher J.
Garside, Ruth
Noyes, Jane
Booth, Andrew
Tunçalp, Özge
Wainwright, Megan
Flottorp, Signe
Tucker, Joseph D.
Carlsen, Benedicte
author_sort Lewin, Simon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The GRADE-CERQual (Confidence in Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research) approach has been developed by the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) Working Group. The approach has been developed to support the use of findings from qualitative evidence syntheses in decision making, including guideline development and policy formulation. CERQual includes four components for assessing how much confidence to place in findings from reviews of qualitative research (also referred to as qualitative evidence syntheses): (1) methodological limitations, (2) coherence, (3) adequacy of data and (4) relevance. This paper is part of a series providing guidance on how to apply CERQual and focuses on making an overall assessment of confidence in a review finding and creating a CERQual Evidence Profile and a CERQual Summary of Qualitative Findings table. METHODS: We developed this guidance by examining the methods used by other GRADE approaches, gathering feedback from relevant research communities and developing consensus through project group meetings. We then piloted the guidance on several qualitative evidence syntheses before agreeing on the approach. RESULTS: Confidence in the evidence is an assessment of the extent to which a review finding is a reasonable representation of the phenomenon of interest. Creating a summary of each review finding and deciding whether or not CERQual should be used are important steps prior to assessing confidence. Confidence should be assessed for each review finding individually, based on the judgements made for each of the four CERQual components. Four levels are used to describe the overall assessment of confidence: high, moderate, low or very low. The overall CERQual assessment for each review finding should be explained in a CERQual Evidence Profile and Summary of Qualitative Findings table. CONCLUSIONS: Structuring and summarising review findings, assessing confidence in those findings using CERQual and creating a CERQual Evidence Profile and Summary of Qualitative Findings table should be essential components of undertaking qualitative evidence syntheses. This paper describes the end point of a CERQual assessment and should be read in conjunction with the other papers in the series that provide information on assessing individual CERQual components. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13012-017-0689-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5791047
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57910472018-02-08 Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings—paper 2: how to make an overall CERQual assessment of confidence and create a Summary of Qualitative Findings table Lewin, Simon Bohren, Meghan Rashidian, Arash Munthe-Kaas, Heather Glenton, Claire Colvin, Christopher J. Garside, Ruth Noyes, Jane Booth, Andrew Tunçalp, Özge Wainwright, Megan Flottorp, Signe Tucker, Joseph D. Carlsen, Benedicte Implement Sci Method BACKGROUND: The GRADE-CERQual (Confidence in Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research) approach has been developed by the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) Working Group. The approach has been developed to support the use of findings from qualitative evidence syntheses in decision making, including guideline development and policy formulation. CERQual includes four components for assessing how much confidence to place in findings from reviews of qualitative research (also referred to as qualitative evidence syntheses): (1) methodological limitations, (2) coherence, (3) adequacy of data and (4) relevance. This paper is part of a series providing guidance on how to apply CERQual and focuses on making an overall assessment of confidence in a review finding and creating a CERQual Evidence Profile and a CERQual Summary of Qualitative Findings table. METHODS: We developed this guidance by examining the methods used by other GRADE approaches, gathering feedback from relevant research communities and developing consensus through project group meetings. We then piloted the guidance on several qualitative evidence syntheses before agreeing on the approach. RESULTS: Confidence in the evidence is an assessment of the extent to which a review finding is a reasonable representation of the phenomenon of interest. Creating a summary of each review finding and deciding whether or not CERQual should be used are important steps prior to assessing confidence. Confidence should be assessed for each review finding individually, based on the judgements made for each of the four CERQual components. Four levels are used to describe the overall assessment of confidence: high, moderate, low or very low. The overall CERQual assessment for each review finding should be explained in a CERQual Evidence Profile and Summary of Qualitative Findings table. CONCLUSIONS: Structuring and summarising review findings, assessing confidence in those findings using CERQual and creating a CERQual Evidence Profile and Summary of Qualitative Findings table should be essential components of undertaking qualitative evidence syntheses. This paper describes the end point of a CERQual assessment and should be read in conjunction with the other papers in the series that provide information on assessing individual CERQual components. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13012-017-0689-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5791047/ /pubmed/29384082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0689-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Method
Lewin, Simon
Bohren, Meghan
Rashidian, Arash
Munthe-Kaas, Heather
Glenton, Claire
Colvin, Christopher J.
Garside, Ruth
Noyes, Jane
Booth, Andrew
Tunçalp, Özge
Wainwright, Megan
Flottorp, Signe
Tucker, Joseph D.
Carlsen, Benedicte
Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings—paper 2: how to make an overall CERQual assessment of confidence and create a Summary of Qualitative Findings table
title Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings—paper 2: how to make an overall CERQual assessment of confidence and create a Summary of Qualitative Findings table
title_full Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings—paper 2: how to make an overall CERQual assessment of confidence and create a Summary of Qualitative Findings table
title_fullStr Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings—paper 2: how to make an overall CERQual assessment of confidence and create a Summary of Qualitative Findings table
title_full_unstemmed Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings—paper 2: how to make an overall CERQual assessment of confidence and create a Summary of Qualitative Findings table
title_short Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings—paper 2: how to make an overall CERQual assessment of confidence and create a Summary of Qualitative Findings table
title_sort applying grade-cerqual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings—paper 2: how to make an overall cerqual assessment of confidence and create a summary of qualitative findings table
topic Method
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5791047/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29384082
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0689-2
work_keys_str_mv AT lewinsimon applyinggradecerqualtoqualitativeevidencesynthesisfindingspaper2howtomakeanoverallcerqualassessmentofconfidenceandcreateasummaryofqualitativefindingstable
AT bohrenmeghan applyinggradecerqualtoqualitativeevidencesynthesisfindingspaper2howtomakeanoverallcerqualassessmentofconfidenceandcreateasummaryofqualitativefindingstable
AT rashidianarash applyinggradecerqualtoqualitativeevidencesynthesisfindingspaper2howtomakeanoverallcerqualassessmentofconfidenceandcreateasummaryofqualitativefindingstable
AT munthekaasheather applyinggradecerqualtoqualitativeevidencesynthesisfindingspaper2howtomakeanoverallcerqualassessmentofconfidenceandcreateasummaryofqualitativefindingstable
AT glentonclaire applyinggradecerqualtoqualitativeevidencesynthesisfindingspaper2howtomakeanoverallcerqualassessmentofconfidenceandcreateasummaryofqualitativefindingstable
AT colvinchristopherj applyinggradecerqualtoqualitativeevidencesynthesisfindingspaper2howtomakeanoverallcerqualassessmentofconfidenceandcreateasummaryofqualitativefindingstable
AT garsideruth applyinggradecerqualtoqualitativeevidencesynthesisfindingspaper2howtomakeanoverallcerqualassessmentofconfidenceandcreateasummaryofqualitativefindingstable
AT noyesjane applyinggradecerqualtoqualitativeevidencesynthesisfindingspaper2howtomakeanoverallcerqualassessmentofconfidenceandcreateasummaryofqualitativefindingstable
AT boothandrew applyinggradecerqualtoqualitativeevidencesynthesisfindingspaper2howtomakeanoverallcerqualassessmentofconfidenceandcreateasummaryofqualitativefindingstable
AT tuncalpozge applyinggradecerqualtoqualitativeevidencesynthesisfindingspaper2howtomakeanoverallcerqualassessmentofconfidenceandcreateasummaryofqualitativefindingstable
AT wainwrightmegan applyinggradecerqualtoqualitativeevidencesynthesisfindingspaper2howtomakeanoverallcerqualassessmentofconfidenceandcreateasummaryofqualitativefindingstable
AT flottorpsigne applyinggradecerqualtoqualitativeevidencesynthesisfindingspaper2howtomakeanoverallcerqualassessmentofconfidenceandcreateasummaryofqualitativefindingstable
AT tuckerjosephd applyinggradecerqualtoqualitativeevidencesynthesisfindingspaper2howtomakeanoverallcerqualassessmentofconfidenceandcreateasummaryofqualitativefindingstable
AT carlsenbenedicte applyinggradecerqualtoqualitativeevidencesynthesisfindingspaper2howtomakeanoverallcerqualassessmentofconfidenceandcreateasummaryofqualitativefindingstable