Cargando…

Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: 2-Year Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes with a Principles-Based SIJ Fusion System

BACKGROUND: Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) degeneration is a common source of low back pain (LBP). Minimally invasive (MI) SIJ fusion procedures have demonstrated meaningful clinical improvement. A recently developed MI SIJ fusion system incorporates decortication, placement of bone graft and fixation with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cross, William W, Delbridge, Arnold, Hales, Donald, Fielding, Louis C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bentham Open 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5791206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29430266
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874325001812010007
_version_ 1783296584282275840
author Cross, William W
Delbridge, Arnold
Hales, Donald
Fielding, Louis C
author_facet Cross, William W
Delbridge, Arnold
Hales, Donald
Fielding, Louis C
author_sort Cross, William W
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) degeneration is a common source of low back pain (LBP). Minimally invasive (MI) SIJ fusion procedures have demonstrated meaningful clinical improvement. A recently developed MI SIJ fusion system incorporates decortication, placement of bone graft and fixation with threaded implants (DC/BG/TF). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nineteen patients who had MI SIJ fusion with DC/BG/TF were enrolled at three centers. Fusion was assessed in CT images obtained 12 and 24 months postoperatively by an independent radiographic core laboratory. LBP was assessed using a 0-10 numerical pain scale (NPS) preoperatively and at 12 and 24 months postoperatively. RESULTS: At 12 months, 15/19 patients (79%) had bridging bone across the SIJ, and at 24 months 17/18 patients (94%) available for follow-up had SIJ fusion. Of the patients with bridging bone 88% had fusion within the decorticated area, with solid fusion in 83%. A significant reduction in NPS scores was demonstrated, representing a 73% reduction in average low back pain. CONCLUSION: The patients in this series demonstrated significant improvement in LBP. Fusion rates at 24 months demonstrate promise for this system, which utilizes the established orthopedic principles of DC/BG/TF to achieve arthrodesis. Further study is warranted to demonstrate comparative fusion rates for different implant systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5791206
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Bentham Open
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57912062018-02-09 Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: 2-Year Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes with a Principles-Based SIJ Fusion System Cross, William W Delbridge, Arnold Hales, Donald Fielding, Louis C Open Orthop J Orthopaedics BACKGROUND: Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) degeneration is a common source of low back pain (LBP). Minimally invasive (MI) SIJ fusion procedures have demonstrated meaningful clinical improvement. A recently developed MI SIJ fusion system incorporates decortication, placement of bone graft and fixation with threaded implants (DC/BG/TF). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nineteen patients who had MI SIJ fusion with DC/BG/TF were enrolled at three centers. Fusion was assessed in CT images obtained 12 and 24 months postoperatively by an independent radiographic core laboratory. LBP was assessed using a 0-10 numerical pain scale (NPS) preoperatively and at 12 and 24 months postoperatively. RESULTS: At 12 months, 15/19 patients (79%) had bridging bone across the SIJ, and at 24 months 17/18 patients (94%) available for follow-up had SIJ fusion. Of the patients with bridging bone 88% had fusion within the decorticated area, with solid fusion in 83%. A significant reduction in NPS scores was demonstrated, representing a 73% reduction in average low back pain. CONCLUSION: The patients in this series demonstrated significant improvement in LBP. Fusion rates at 24 months demonstrate promise for this system, which utilizes the established orthopedic principles of DC/BG/TF to achieve arthrodesis. Further study is warranted to demonstrate comparative fusion rates for different implant systems. Bentham Open 2018-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5791206/ /pubmed/29430266 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874325001812010007 Text en © 2018 Cross et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Orthopaedics
Cross, William W
Delbridge, Arnold
Hales, Donald
Fielding, Louis C
Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: 2-Year Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes with a Principles-Based SIJ Fusion System
title Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: 2-Year Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes with a Principles-Based SIJ Fusion System
title_full Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: 2-Year Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes with a Principles-Based SIJ Fusion System
title_fullStr Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: 2-Year Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes with a Principles-Based SIJ Fusion System
title_full_unstemmed Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: 2-Year Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes with a Principles-Based SIJ Fusion System
title_short Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: 2-Year Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes with a Principles-Based SIJ Fusion System
title_sort minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion: 2-year radiographic and clinical outcomes with a principles-based sij fusion system
topic Orthopaedics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5791206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29430266
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874325001812010007
work_keys_str_mv AT crosswilliamw minimallyinvasivesacroiliacjointfusion2yearradiographicandclinicaloutcomeswithaprinciplesbasedsijfusionsystem
AT delbridgearnold minimallyinvasivesacroiliacjointfusion2yearradiographicandclinicaloutcomeswithaprinciplesbasedsijfusionsystem
AT halesdonald minimallyinvasivesacroiliacjointfusion2yearradiographicandclinicaloutcomeswithaprinciplesbasedsijfusionsystem
AT fieldinglouisc minimallyinvasivesacroiliacjointfusion2yearradiographicandclinicaloutcomeswithaprinciplesbasedsijfusionsystem