Cargando…

Review of carcinogenicity of hexavalent chrome and proposal of revising approval standards for an occupational cancers in Korea

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study is to suggest revised recognition standards for occupational disease due to chromium (VI) by reflecting recent domestic and international research works and considering domestic exposure status with respect to target organs, exposure period, and cumulative exp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Jungwon, Seo, Sangyun, Kim, Yangho, Kim, Dae Hwan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5791242/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29423230
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40557-018-0215-2
_version_ 1783296592815587328
author Kim, Jungwon
Seo, Sangyun
Kim, Yangho
Kim, Dae Hwan
author_facet Kim, Jungwon
Seo, Sangyun
Kim, Yangho
Kim, Dae Hwan
author_sort Kim, Jungwon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The objective of this study is to suggest revised recognition standards for occupational disease due to chromium (VI) by reflecting recent domestic and international research works and considering domestic exposure status with respect to target organs, exposure period, and cumulative exposure dose in relation to the chromium (VI)-induced occupational disease compensation. METHODS: In this study, the reports published by major international institutions such as World Health Organization (WHO) International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) (2012), Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) (2006), National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) (2013), American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) (2004), National Toxicology Program (NTP) (2014), and Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ASTDR) (2012) were reviewed and the recent research works searched by PubMed were summarized. RESULTS: Considering the recent research works and the domestic situation, only lung cancer is conserved in the legislative bill in relation to chromium (VI), and the exposure period is not included in the bill. Nasal and paranasal sinus cancer was excluded from the list of cancers that are compensated as the chromium (VI)- induced occupational disease, while lung cancer remains in the list. In the view of legislative unity, considering the fact that only the cancers having sufficient evidence are included in the conventional list of cancers compensated as occupational disease, nasal and paranasal sinus cancer having limited evidence were excluded from the list. The exposure period was also removed from the legislative bill due to the insufficient evidence. Recent advices in connection with cumulative exposure dose were proposed, and other considerable points were provided with respect to individual occupational relevance. CONCLUSIONS: It is suggested that the current recognition standard which is “Lung cancer or nasal and paranasal sinus cancer caused by exposure to chromium (VI) or compounds thereof (exposure for two years or longer), or nickel compounds” should be changed to “Lung cancer caused by exposure to chromium (VI) or compounds thereof, and lung cancer or nasal and paranasal sinus cancer caused by exposure to nickel compounds”.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5791242
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57912422018-02-08 Review of carcinogenicity of hexavalent chrome and proposal of revising approval standards for an occupational cancers in Korea Kim, Jungwon Seo, Sangyun Kim, Yangho Kim, Dae Hwan Ann Occup Environ Med Research Article BACKGROUND: The objective of this study is to suggest revised recognition standards for occupational disease due to chromium (VI) by reflecting recent domestic and international research works and considering domestic exposure status with respect to target organs, exposure period, and cumulative exposure dose in relation to the chromium (VI)-induced occupational disease compensation. METHODS: In this study, the reports published by major international institutions such as World Health Organization (WHO) International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) (2012), Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) (2006), National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) (2013), American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) (2004), National Toxicology Program (NTP) (2014), and Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ASTDR) (2012) were reviewed and the recent research works searched by PubMed were summarized. RESULTS: Considering the recent research works and the domestic situation, only lung cancer is conserved in the legislative bill in relation to chromium (VI), and the exposure period is not included in the bill. Nasal and paranasal sinus cancer was excluded from the list of cancers that are compensated as the chromium (VI)- induced occupational disease, while lung cancer remains in the list. In the view of legislative unity, considering the fact that only the cancers having sufficient evidence are included in the conventional list of cancers compensated as occupational disease, nasal and paranasal sinus cancer having limited evidence were excluded from the list. The exposure period was also removed from the legislative bill due to the insufficient evidence. Recent advices in connection with cumulative exposure dose were proposed, and other considerable points were provided with respect to individual occupational relevance. CONCLUSIONS: It is suggested that the current recognition standard which is “Lung cancer or nasal and paranasal sinus cancer caused by exposure to chromium (VI) or compounds thereof (exposure for two years or longer), or nickel compounds” should be changed to “Lung cancer caused by exposure to chromium (VI) or compounds thereof, and lung cancer or nasal and paranasal sinus cancer caused by exposure to nickel compounds”. BioMed Central 2018-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5791242/ /pubmed/29423230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40557-018-0215-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kim, Jungwon
Seo, Sangyun
Kim, Yangho
Kim, Dae Hwan
Review of carcinogenicity of hexavalent chrome and proposal of revising approval standards for an occupational cancers in Korea
title Review of carcinogenicity of hexavalent chrome and proposal of revising approval standards for an occupational cancers in Korea
title_full Review of carcinogenicity of hexavalent chrome and proposal of revising approval standards for an occupational cancers in Korea
title_fullStr Review of carcinogenicity of hexavalent chrome and proposal of revising approval standards for an occupational cancers in Korea
title_full_unstemmed Review of carcinogenicity of hexavalent chrome and proposal of revising approval standards for an occupational cancers in Korea
title_short Review of carcinogenicity of hexavalent chrome and proposal of revising approval standards for an occupational cancers in Korea
title_sort review of carcinogenicity of hexavalent chrome and proposal of revising approval standards for an occupational cancers in korea
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5791242/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29423230
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40557-018-0215-2
work_keys_str_mv AT kimjungwon reviewofcarcinogenicityofhexavalentchromeandproposalofrevisingapprovalstandardsforanoccupationalcancersinkorea
AT seosangyun reviewofcarcinogenicityofhexavalentchromeandproposalofrevisingapprovalstandardsforanoccupationalcancersinkorea
AT kimyangho reviewofcarcinogenicityofhexavalentchromeandproposalofrevisingapprovalstandardsforanoccupationalcancersinkorea
AT kimdaehwan reviewofcarcinogenicityofhexavalentchromeandproposalofrevisingapprovalstandardsforanoccupationalcancersinkorea