Cargando…
Review of carcinogenicity of hexavalent chrome and proposal of revising approval standards for an occupational cancers in Korea
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study is to suggest revised recognition standards for occupational disease due to chromium (VI) by reflecting recent domestic and international research works and considering domestic exposure status with respect to target organs, exposure period, and cumulative exp...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5791242/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29423230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40557-018-0215-2 |
_version_ | 1783296592815587328 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Jungwon Seo, Sangyun Kim, Yangho Kim, Dae Hwan |
author_facet | Kim, Jungwon Seo, Sangyun Kim, Yangho Kim, Dae Hwan |
author_sort | Kim, Jungwon |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The objective of this study is to suggest revised recognition standards for occupational disease due to chromium (VI) by reflecting recent domestic and international research works and considering domestic exposure status with respect to target organs, exposure period, and cumulative exposure dose in relation to the chromium (VI)-induced occupational disease compensation. METHODS: In this study, the reports published by major international institutions such as World Health Organization (WHO) International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) (2012), Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) (2006), National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) (2013), American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) (2004), National Toxicology Program (NTP) (2014), and Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ASTDR) (2012) were reviewed and the recent research works searched by PubMed were summarized. RESULTS: Considering the recent research works and the domestic situation, only lung cancer is conserved in the legislative bill in relation to chromium (VI), and the exposure period is not included in the bill. Nasal and paranasal sinus cancer was excluded from the list of cancers that are compensated as the chromium (VI)- induced occupational disease, while lung cancer remains in the list. In the view of legislative unity, considering the fact that only the cancers having sufficient evidence are included in the conventional list of cancers compensated as occupational disease, nasal and paranasal sinus cancer having limited evidence were excluded from the list. The exposure period was also removed from the legislative bill due to the insufficient evidence. Recent advices in connection with cumulative exposure dose were proposed, and other considerable points were provided with respect to individual occupational relevance. CONCLUSIONS: It is suggested that the current recognition standard which is “Lung cancer or nasal and paranasal sinus cancer caused by exposure to chromium (VI) or compounds thereof (exposure for two years or longer), or nickel compounds” should be changed to “Lung cancer caused by exposure to chromium (VI) or compounds thereof, and lung cancer or nasal and paranasal sinus cancer caused by exposure to nickel compounds”. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5791242 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57912422018-02-08 Review of carcinogenicity of hexavalent chrome and proposal of revising approval standards for an occupational cancers in Korea Kim, Jungwon Seo, Sangyun Kim, Yangho Kim, Dae Hwan Ann Occup Environ Med Research Article BACKGROUND: The objective of this study is to suggest revised recognition standards for occupational disease due to chromium (VI) by reflecting recent domestic and international research works and considering domestic exposure status with respect to target organs, exposure period, and cumulative exposure dose in relation to the chromium (VI)-induced occupational disease compensation. METHODS: In this study, the reports published by major international institutions such as World Health Organization (WHO) International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) (2012), Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) (2006), National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) (2013), American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) (2004), National Toxicology Program (NTP) (2014), and Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ASTDR) (2012) were reviewed and the recent research works searched by PubMed were summarized. RESULTS: Considering the recent research works and the domestic situation, only lung cancer is conserved in the legislative bill in relation to chromium (VI), and the exposure period is not included in the bill. Nasal and paranasal sinus cancer was excluded from the list of cancers that are compensated as the chromium (VI)- induced occupational disease, while lung cancer remains in the list. In the view of legislative unity, considering the fact that only the cancers having sufficient evidence are included in the conventional list of cancers compensated as occupational disease, nasal and paranasal sinus cancer having limited evidence were excluded from the list. The exposure period was also removed from the legislative bill due to the insufficient evidence. Recent advices in connection with cumulative exposure dose were proposed, and other considerable points were provided with respect to individual occupational relevance. CONCLUSIONS: It is suggested that the current recognition standard which is “Lung cancer or nasal and paranasal sinus cancer caused by exposure to chromium (VI) or compounds thereof (exposure for two years or longer), or nickel compounds” should be changed to “Lung cancer caused by exposure to chromium (VI) or compounds thereof, and lung cancer or nasal and paranasal sinus cancer caused by exposure to nickel compounds”. BioMed Central 2018-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5791242/ /pubmed/29423230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40557-018-0215-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kim, Jungwon Seo, Sangyun Kim, Yangho Kim, Dae Hwan Review of carcinogenicity of hexavalent chrome and proposal of revising approval standards for an occupational cancers in Korea |
title | Review of carcinogenicity of hexavalent chrome and proposal of revising approval standards for an occupational cancers in Korea |
title_full | Review of carcinogenicity of hexavalent chrome and proposal of revising approval standards for an occupational cancers in Korea |
title_fullStr | Review of carcinogenicity of hexavalent chrome and proposal of revising approval standards for an occupational cancers in Korea |
title_full_unstemmed | Review of carcinogenicity of hexavalent chrome and proposal of revising approval standards for an occupational cancers in Korea |
title_short | Review of carcinogenicity of hexavalent chrome and proposal of revising approval standards for an occupational cancers in Korea |
title_sort | review of carcinogenicity of hexavalent chrome and proposal of revising approval standards for an occupational cancers in korea |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5791242/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29423230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40557-018-0215-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimjungwon reviewofcarcinogenicityofhexavalentchromeandproposalofrevisingapprovalstandardsforanoccupationalcancersinkorea AT seosangyun reviewofcarcinogenicityofhexavalentchromeandproposalofrevisingapprovalstandardsforanoccupationalcancersinkorea AT kimyangho reviewofcarcinogenicityofhexavalentchromeandproposalofrevisingapprovalstandardsforanoccupationalcancersinkorea AT kimdaehwan reviewofcarcinogenicityofhexavalentchromeandproposalofrevisingapprovalstandardsforanoccupationalcancersinkorea |