Cargando…

A prospective randomized study comparing recovery following anesthesia with a combination of intravenous dexmedetomidine and desflurane or sevoflurane in spinal surgeries

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Desflurane and sevoflurane are inhalational anesthetics which provide stable intraoperative hemodynamics and rapid emergence from anesthesia. Dexmedetomidine is an α2-agonist with sedative and hypnotic effects. We compared recovery following anesthesia with a combination of a co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patil, Yogita, Bagade, Suyog, Patil, Nilesh, Jadhav, Nalini
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5791269/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29416248
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_61_16
_version_ 1783296599142694912
author Patil, Yogita
Bagade, Suyog
Patil, Nilesh
Jadhav, Nalini
author_facet Patil, Yogita
Bagade, Suyog
Patil, Nilesh
Jadhav, Nalini
author_sort Patil, Yogita
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Desflurane and sevoflurane are inhalational anesthetics which provide stable intraoperative hemodynamics and rapid emergence from anesthesia. Dexmedetomidine is an α2-agonist with sedative and hypnotic effects. We compared recovery following anesthesia with a combination of a continuous intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine and desflurane or sevoflurane in cases of spine surgeries because no such data are available from India. MATERIAL AND METHODS: It was a single-blind, prospective, randomized study. After institutional ethics committee approval, patients were randomly allocated to one of the two groups of fifty patients each. Group D received desflurane and Group S received sevoflurane, along with dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg/kg/h IV infusion for maintenance of anesthesia. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Extubation time (ET) in Group D was shorter by 4.2 min than in Group S (10.1 ± 2.2 and 14.2 ± 1.3; P = 0.004). Postoperative recovery, postoperative analgesic, and antiemetic requirement between the groups were comparable The mean dial setting required to maintain the minimum alveolar concentration of 1 intraoperatively was 3.1 for desflurane and 0.7 for sevoflurane.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5791269
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57912692018-02-07 A prospective randomized study comparing recovery following anesthesia with a combination of intravenous dexmedetomidine and desflurane or sevoflurane in spinal surgeries Patil, Yogita Bagade, Suyog Patil, Nilesh Jadhav, Nalini J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Desflurane and sevoflurane are inhalational anesthetics which provide stable intraoperative hemodynamics and rapid emergence from anesthesia. Dexmedetomidine is an α2-agonist with sedative and hypnotic effects. We compared recovery following anesthesia with a combination of a continuous intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine and desflurane or sevoflurane in cases of spine surgeries because no such data are available from India. MATERIAL AND METHODS: It was a single-blind, prospective, randomized study. After institutional ethics committee approval, patients were randomly allocated to one of the two groups of fifty patients each. Group D received desflurane and Group S received sevoflurane, along with dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg/kg/h IV infusion for maintenance of anesthesia. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Extubation time (ET) in Group D was shorter by 4.2 min than in Group S (10.1 ± 2.2 and 14.2 ± 1.3; P = 0.004). Postoperative recovery, postoperative analgesic, and antiemetic requirement between the groups were comparable The mean dial setting required to maintain the minimum alveolar concentration of 1 intraoperatively was 3.1 for desflurane and 0.7 for sevoflurane. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5791269/ /pubmed/29416248 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_61_16 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Patil, Yogita
Bagade, Suyog
Patil, Nilesh
Jadhav, Nalini
A prospective randomized study comparing recovery following anesthesia with a combination of intravenous dexmedetomidine and desflurane or sevoflurane in spinal surgeries
title A prospective randomized study comparing recovery following anesthesia with a combination of intravenous dexmedetomidine and desflurane or sevoflurane in spinal surgeries
title_full A prospective randomized study comparing recovery following anesthesia with a combination of intravenous dexmedetomidine and desflurane or sevoflurane in spinal surgeries
title_fullStr A prospective randomized study comparing recovery following anesthesia with a combination of intravenous dexmedetomidine and desflurane or sevoflurane in spinal surgeries
title_full_unstemmed A prospective randomized study comparing recovery following anesthesia with a combination of intravenous dexmedetomidine and desflurane or sevoflurane in spinal surgeries
title_short A prospective randomized study comparing recovery following anesthesia with a combination of intravenous dexmedetomidine and desflurane or sevoflurane in spinal surgeries
title_sort prospective randomized study comparing recovery following anesthesia with a combination of intravenous dexmedetomidine and desflurane or sevoflurane in spinal surgeries
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5791269/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29416248
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_61_16
work_keys_str_mv AT patilyogita aprospectiverandomizedstudycomparingrecoveryfollowinganesthesiawithacombinationofintravenousdexmedetomidineanddesfluraneorsevofluraneinspinalsurgeries
AT bagadesuyog aprospectiverandomizedstudycomparingrecoveryfollowinganesthesiawithacombinationofintravenousdexmedetomidineanddesfluraneorsevofluraneinspinalsurgeries
AT patilnilesh aprospectiverandomizedstudycomparingrecoveryfollowinganesthesiawithacombinationofintravenousdexmedetomidineanddesfluraneorsevofluraneinspinalsurgeries
AT jadhavnalini aprospectiverandomizedstudycomparingrecoveryfollowinganesthesiawithacombinationofintravenousdexmedetomidineanddesfluraneorsevofluraneinspinalsurgeries
AT patilyogita prospectiverandomizedstudycomparingrecoveryfollowinganesthesiawithacombinationofintravenousdexmedetomidineanddesfluraneorsevofluraneinspinalsurgeries
AT bagadesuyog prospectiverandomizedstudycomparingrecoveryfollowinganesthesiawithacombinationofintravenousdexmedetomidineanddesfluraneorsevofluraneinspinalsurgeries
AT patilnilesh prospectiverandomizedstudycomparingrecoveryfollowinganesthesiawithacombinationofintravenousdexmedetomidineanddesfluraneorsevofluraneinspinalsurgeries
AT jadhavnalini prospectiverandomizedstudycomparingrecoveryfollowinganesthesiawithacombinationofintravenousdexmedetomidineanddesfluraneorsevofluraneinspinalsurgeries