Cargando…
A prospective randomized study comparing recovery following anesthesia with a combination of intravenous dexmedetomidine and desflurane or sevoflurane in spinal surgeries
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Desflurane and sevoflurane are inhalational anesthetics which provide stable intraoperative hemodynamics and rapid emergence from anesthesia. Dexmedetomidine is an α2-agonist with sedative and hypnotic effects. We compared recovery following anesthesia with a combination of a co...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5791269/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29416248 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_61_16 |
_version_ | 1783296599142694912 |
---|---|
author | Patil, Yogita Bagade, Suyog Patil, Nilesh Jadhav, Nalini |
author_facet | Patil, Yogita Bagade, Suyog Patil, Nilesh Jadhav, Nalini |
author_sort | Patil, Yogita |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Desflurane and sevoflurane are inhalational anesthetics which provide stable intraoperative hemodynamics and rapid emergence from anesthesia. Dexmedetomidine is an α2-agonist with sedative and hypnotic effects. We compared recovery following anesthesia with a combination of a continuous intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine and desflurane or sevoflurane in cases of spine surgeries because no such data are available from India. MATERIAL AND METHODS: It was a single-blind, prospective, randomized study. After institutional ethics committee approval, patients were randomly allocated to one of the two groups of fifty patients each. Group D received desflurane and Group S received sevoflurane, along with dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg/kg/h IV infusion for maintenance of anesthesia. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Extubation time (ET) in Group D was shorter by 4.2 min than in Group S (10.1 ± 2.2 and 14.2 ± 1.3; P = 0.004). Postoperative recovery, postoperative analgesic, and antiemetic requirement between the groups were comparable The mean dial setting required to maintain the minimum alveolar concentration of 1 intraoperatively was 3.1 for desflurane and 0.7 for sevoflurane. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5791269 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57912692018-02-07 A prospective randomized study comparing recovery following anesthesia with a combination of intravenous dexmedetomidine and desflurane or sevoflurane in spinal surgeries Patil, Yogita Bagade, Suyog Patil, Nilesh Jadhav, Nalini J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Desflurane and sevoflurane are inhalational anesthetics which provide stable intraoperative hemodynamics and rapid emergence from anesthesia. Dexmedetomidine is an α2-agonist with sedative and hypnotic effects. We compared recovery following anesthesia with a combination of a continuous intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine and desflurane or sevoflurane in cases of spine surgeries because no such data are available from India. MATERIAL AND METHODS: It was a single-blind, prospective, randomized study. After institutional ethics committee approval, patients were randomly allocated to one of the two groups of fifty patients each. Group D received desflurane and Group S received sevoflurane, along with dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg/kg/h IV infusion for maintenance of anesthesia. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Extubation time (ET) in Group D was shorter by 4.2 min than in Group S (10.1 ± 2.2 and 14.2 ± 1.3; P = 0.004). Postoperative recovery, postoperative analgesic, and antiemetic requirement between the groups were comparable The mean dial setting required to maintain the minimum alveolar concentration of 1 intraoperatively was 3.1 for desflurane and 0.7 for sevoflurane. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5791269/ /pubmed/29416248 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_61_16 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Patil, Yogita Bagade, Suyog Patil, Nilesh Jadhav, Nalini A prospective randomized study comparing recovery following anesthesia with a combination of intravenous dexmedetomidine and desflurane or sevoflurane in spinal surgeries |
title | A prospective randomized study comparing recovery following anesthesia with a combination of intravenous dexmedetomidine and desflurane or sevoflurane in spinal surgeries |
title_full | A prospective randomized study comparing recovery following anesthesia with a combination of intravenous dexmedetomidine and desflurane or sevoflurane in spinal surgeries |
title_fullStr | A prospective randomized study comparing recovery following anesthesia with a combination of intravenous dexmedetomidine and desflurane or sevoflurane in spinal surgeries |
title_full_unstemmed | A prospective randomized study comparing recovery following anesthesia with a combination of intravenous dexmedetomidine and desflurane or sevoflurane in spinal surgeries |
title_short | A prospective randomized study comparing recovery following anesthesia with a combination of intravenous dexmedetomidine and desflurane or sevoflurane in spinal surgeries |
title_sort | prospective randomized study comparing recovery following anesthesia with a combination of intravenous dexmedetomidine and desflurane or sevoflurane in spinal surgeries |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5791269/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29416248 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_61_16 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT patilyogita aprospectiverandomizedstudycomparingrecoveryfollowinganesthesiawithacombinationofintravenousdexmedetomidineanddesfluraneorsevofluraneinspinalsurgeries AT bagadesuyog aprospectiverandomizedstudycomparingrecoveryfollowinganesthesiawithacombinationofintravenousdexmedetomidineanddesfluraneorsevofluraneinspinalsurgeries AT patilnilesh aprospectiverandomizedstudycomparingrecoveryfollowinganesthesiawithacombinationofintravenousdexmedetomidineanddesfluraneorsevofluraneinspinalsurgeries AT jadhavnalini aprospectiverandomizedstudycomparingrecoveryfollowinganesthesiawithacombinationofintravenousdexmedetomidineanddesfluraneorsevofluraneinspinalsurgeries AT patilyogita prospectiverandomizedstudycomparingrecoveryfollowinganesthesiawithacombinationofintravenousdexmedetomidineanddesfluraneorsevofluraneinspinalsurgeries AT bagadesuyog prospectiverandomizedstudycomparingrecoveryfollowinganesthesiawithacombinationofintravenousdexmedetomidineanddesfluraneorsevofluraneinspinalsurgeries AT patilnilesh prospectiverandomizedstudycomparingrecoveryfollowinganesthesiawithacombinationofintravenousdexmedetomidineanddesfluraneorsevofluraneinspinalsurgeries AT jadhavnalini prospectiverandomizedstudycomparingrecoveryfollowinganesthesiawithacombinationofintravenousdexmedetomidineanddesfluraneorsevofluraneinspinalsurgeries |