Cargando…
Pettiness: Conceptualization, measurement and cross-cultural differences
Although pettiness, defined as the tendency to get agitated over trivial matters, is a facet of neuroticism which has negative health implications, no measure exists. The goal of the current study was to develop, and validate a short pettiness scale. In Study 1 (N = 2136), Exploratory Factor Analysi...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5791981/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29385157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191252 |
_version_ | 1783296687556526080 |
---|---|
author | Ng, Reuben Levy, Becca |
author_facet | Ng, Reuben Levy, Becca |
author_sort | Ng, Reuben |
collection | PubMed |
description | Although pettiness, defined as the tendency to get agitated over trivial matters, is a facet of neuroticism which has negative health implications, no measure exists. The goal of the current study was to develop, and validate a short pettiness scale. In Study 1 (N = 2136), Exploratory Factor Analysis distilled a one-factor model with five items. Convergent validity was established using the Big Five Inventory, DASS, Satisfaction with Life Scale, and Conner-Davidson Resilience Scale. As predicted, pettiness was positively associated with neuroticism, depression, anxiety and stress but negatively related to extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, openness, life satisfaction and resilience. Also, as predicted, pettiness was not significantly related to physical functioning, or blind and constructive patriotism, indicating discriminant validity. Confirmatory Factor Analysis in Study 2 (N = 734) revealed a stable one-factor model of pettiness. In Study 3 (N = 532), the scale, which showed a similar factor structure in the USA and Singapore, also reflected predicted cross-cultural patterns: Pettiness was found to be significantly lower in the United States, a culture categorized as “looser” than in Singapore, a culture classified as “tighter” in terms of Gelfand and colleagues’ framework of national tendencies to oppose social deviance. Results suggest that this brief 5-item tool is a reliable and valid measure of pettiness, and its use in health research is encouraged. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5791981 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57919812018-02-09 Pettiness: Conceptualization, measurement and cross-cultural differences Ng, Reuben Levy, Becca PLoS One Research Article Although pettiness, defined as the tendency to get agitated over trivial matters, is a facet of neuroticism which has negative health implications, no measure exists. The goal of the current study was to develop, and validate a short pettiness scale. In Study 1 (N = 2136), Exploratory Factor Analysis distilled a one-factor model with five items. Convergent validity was established using the Big Five Inventory, DASS, Satisfaction with Life Scale, and Conner-Davidson Resilience Scale. As predicted, pettiness was positively associated with neuroticism, depression, anxiety and stress but negatively related to extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, openness, life satisfaction and resilience. Also, as predicted, pettiness was not significantly related to physical functioning, or blind and constructive patriotism, indicating discriminant validity. Confirmatory Factor Analysis in Study 2 (N = 734) revealed a stable one-factor model of pettiness. In Study 3 (N = 532), the scale, which showed a similar factor structure in the USA and Singapore, also reflected predicted cross-cultural patterns: Pettiness was found to be significantly lower in the United States, a culture categorized as “looser” than in Singapore, a culture classified as “tighter” in terms of Gelfand and colleagues’ framework of national tendencies to oppose social deviance. Results suggest that this brief 5-item tool is a reliable and valid measure of pettiness, and its use in health research is encouraged. Public Library of Science 2018-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5791981/ /pubmed/29385157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191252 Text en © 2018 Ng, Levy http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ng, Reuben Levy, Becca Pettiness: Conceptualization, measurement and cross-cultural differences |
title | Pettiness: Conceptualization, measurement and cross-cultural differences |
title_full | Pettiness: Conceptualization, measurement and cross-cultural differences |
title_fullStr | Pettiness: Conceptualization, measurement and cross-cultural differences |
title_full_unstemmed | Pettiness: Conceptualization, measurement and cross-cultural differences |
title_short | Pettiness: Conceptualization, measurement and cross-cultural differences |
title_sort | pettiness: conceptualization, measurement and cross-cultural differences |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5791981/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29385157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191252 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ngreuben pettinessconceptualizationmeasurementandcrossculturaldifferences AT levybecca pettinessconceptualizationmeasurementandcrossculturaldifferences |