Cargando…

Pettiness: Conceptualization, measurement and cross-cultural differences

Although pettiness, defined as the tendency to get agitated over trivial matters, is a facet of neuroticism which has negative health implications, no measure exists. The goal of the current study was to develop, and validate a short pettiness scale. In Study 1 (N = 2136), Exploratory Factor Analysi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ng, Reuben, Levy, Becca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5791981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29385157
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191252
_version_ 1783296687556526080
author Ng, Reuben
Levy, Becca
author_facet Ng, Reuben
Levy, Becca
author_sort Ng, Reuben
collection PubMed
description Although pettiness, defined as the tendency to get agitated over trivial matters, is a facet of neuroticism which has negative health implications, no measure exists. The goal of the current study was to develop, and validate a short pettiness scale. In Study 1 (N = 2136), Exploratory Factor Analysis distilled a one-factor model with five items. Convergent validity was established using the Big Five Inventory, DASS, Satisfaction with Life Scale, and Conner-Davidson Resilience Scale. As predicted, pettiness was positively associated with neuroticism, depression, anxiety and stress but negatively related to extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, openness, life satisfaction and resilience. Also, as predicted, pettiness was not significantly related to physical functioning, or blind and constructive patriotism, indicating discriminant validity. Confirmatory Factor Analysis in Study 2 (N = 734) revealed a stable one-factor model of pettiness. In Study 3 (N = 532), the scale, which showed a similar factor structure in the USA and Singapore, also reflected predicted cross-cultural patterns: Pettiness was found to be significantly lower in the United States, a culture categorized as “looser” than in Singapore, a culture classified as “tighter” in terms of Gelfand and colleagues’ framework of national tendencies to oppose social deviance. Results suggest that this brief 5-item tool is a reliable and valid measure of pettiness, and its use in health research is encouraged.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5791981
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57919812018-02-09 Pettiness: Conceptualization, measurement and cross-cultural differences Ng, Reuben Levy, Becca PLoS One Research Article Although pettiness, defined as the tendency to get agitated over trivial matters, is a facet of neuroticism which has negative health implications, no measure exists. The goal of the current study was to develop, and validate a short pettiness scale. In Study 1 (N = 2136), Exploratory Factor Analysis distilled a one-factor model with five items. Convergent validity was established using the Big Five Inventory, DASS, Satisfaction with Life Scale, and Conner-Davidson Resilience Scale. As predicted, pettiness was positively associated with neuroticism, depression, anxiety and stress but negatively related to extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, openness, life satisfaction and resilience. Also, as predicted, pettiness was not significantly related to physical functioning, or blind and constructive patriotism, indicating discriminant validity. Confirmatory Factor Analysis in Study 2 (N = 734) revealed a stable one-factor model of pettiness. In Study 3 (N = 532), the scale, which showed a similar factor structure in the USA and Singapore, also reflected predicted cross-cultural patterns: Pettiness was found to be significantly lower in the United States, a culture categorized as “looser” than in Singapore, a culture classified as “tighter” in terms of Gelfand and colleagues’ framework of national tendencies to oppose social deviance. Results suggest that this brief 5-item tool is a reliable and valid measure of pettiness, and its use in health research is encouraged. Public Library of Science 2018-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5791981/ /pubmed/29385157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191252 Text en © 2018 Ng, Levy http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ng, Reuben
Levy, Becca
Pettiness: Conceptualization, measurement and cross-cultural differences
title Pettiness: Conceptualization, measurement and cross-cultural differences
title_full Pettiness: Conceptualization, measurement and cross-cultural differences
title_fullStr Pettiness: Conceptualization, measurement and cross-cultural differences
title_full_unstemmed Pettiness: Conceptualization, measurement and cross-cultural differences
title_short Pettiness: Conceptualization, measurement and cross-cultural differences
title_sort pettiness: conceptualization, measurement and cross-cultural differences
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5791981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29385157
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191252
work_keys_str_mv AT ngreuben pettinessconceptualizationmeasurementandcrossculturaldifferences
AT levybecca pettinessconceptualizationmeasurementandcrossculturaldifferences