Cargando…

Sex differences in circadian food anticipatory activity are not altered by individual manipulations of sex hormones or sex chromosome copy number in mice

Recent studies in mice have demonstrated a sexual dimorphism in circadian entrainment to scheduled feeding. On a time restricted diet, males tend to develop food anticipatory activity (FAA) sooner than females and with a higher amplitude of activity. The underlying cause of this sex difference remai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aguayo, Antonio, Martin, Camille S., Huddy, Timothy F., Ogawa-Okada, Maya, Adkins, Jamie L., Steele, Andrew D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5792018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29385171
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191373
_version_ 1783296696176869376
author Aguayo, Antonio
Martin, Camille S.
Huddy, Timothy F.
Ogawa-Okada, Maya
Adkins, Jamie L.
Steele, Andrew D.
author_facet Aguayo, Antonio
Martin, Camille S.
Huddy, Timothy F.
Ogawa-Okada, Maya
Adkins, Jamie L.
Steele, Andrew D.
author_sort Aguayo, Antonio
collection PubMed
description Recent studies in mice have demonstrated a sexual dimorphism in circadian entrainment to scheduled feeding. On a time restricted diet, males tend to develop food anticipatory activity (FAA) sooner than females and with a higher amplitude of activity. The underlying cause of this sex difference remains unknown. One study suggests that sex hormones, both androgens and estrogens, modulate food anticipatory activity in mice. Here we present results suggesting that the sex difference in FAA is unrelated to gonadal sex hormones. While a sex difference between males and females in FAA on a timed, calorie restricted diet was observed there were no differences between intact and gonadectomized mice in the onset or magnitude of FAA. To test other sources of the sex difference in circadian entrainment to scheduled feeding, we used sex chromosome copy number mutants, but there was no difference in FAA when comparing XX, XY-, XY-;Sry Tg, and XX;Sry Tg mice, demonstrating that gene dosage of sex chromosomes does not mediate the sex difference in FAA. Next, we masculinized female mice by treating them with 17-beta estradiol during the neonatal period; yet again, we saw no difference in FAA between control and masculinized females. Finally, we observed that there was no longer a sex difference in FAA for older mice, suggesting that the sex difference in FAA is age-dependent. Thus, our study demonstrates that singular manipulations of gonadal hormones, sex chromosomes, or developmental patterning are not able to explain the difference in FAA between young male and female mice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5792018
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57920182018-02-09 Sex differences in circadian food anticipatory activity are not altered by individual manipulations of sex hormones or sex chromosome copy number in mice Aguayo, Antonio Martin, Camille S. Huddy, Timothy F. Ogawa-Okada, Maya Adkins, Jamie L. Steele, Andrew D. PLoS One Research Article Recent studies in mice have demonstrated a sexual dimorphism in circadian entrainment to scheduled feeding. On a time restricted diet, males tend to develop food anticipatory activity (FAA) sooner than females and with a higher amplitude of activity. The underlying cause of this sex difference remains unknown. One study suggests that sex hormones, both androgens and estrogens, modulate food anticipatory activity in mice. Here we present results suggesting that the sex difference in FAA is unrelated to gonadal sex hormones. While a sex difference between males and females in FAA on a timed, calorie restricted diet was observed there were no differences between intact and gonadectomized mice in the onset or magnitude of FAA. To test other sources of the sex difference in circadian entrainment to scheduled feeding, we used sex chromosome copy number mutants, but there was no difference in FAA when comparing XX, XY-, XY-;Sry Tg, and XX;Sry Tg mice, demonstrating that gene dosage of sex chromosomes does not mediate the sex difference in FAA. Next, we masculinized female mice by treating them with 17-beta estradiol during the neonatal period; yet again, we saw no difference in FAA between control and masculinized females. Finally, we observed that there was no longer a sex difference in FAA for older mice, suggesting that the sex difference in FAA is age-dependent. Thus, our study demonstrates that singular manipulations of gonadal hormones, sex chromosomes, or developmental patterning are not able to explain the difference in FAA between young male and female mice. Public Library of Science 2018-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5792018/ /pubmed/29385171 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191373 Text en © 2018 Aguayo et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Aguayo, Antonio
Martin, Camille S.
Huddy, Timothy F.
Ogawa-Okada, Maya
Adkins, Jamie L.
Steele, Andrew D.
Sex differences in circadian food anticipatory activity are not altered by individual manipulations of sex hormones or sex chromosome copy number in mice
title Sex differences in circadian food anticipatory activity are not altered by individual manipulations of sex hormones or sex chromosome copy number in mice
title_full Sex differences in circadian food anticipatory activity are not altered by individual manipulations of sex hormones or sex chromosome copy number in mice
title_fullStr Sex differences in circadian food anticipatory activity are not altered by individual manipulations of sex hormones or sex chromosome copy number in mice
title_full_unstemmed Sex differences in circadian food anticipatory activity are not altered by individual manipulations of sex hormones or sex chromosome copy number in mice
title_short Sex differences in circadian food anticipatory activity are not altered by individual manipulations of sex hormones or sex chromosome copy number in mice
title_sort sex differences in circadian food anticipatory activity are not altered by individual manipulations of sex hormones or sex chromosome copy number in mice
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5792018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29385171
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191373
work_keys_str_mv AT aguayoantonio sexdifferencesincircadianfoodanticipatoryactivityarenotalteredbyindividualmanipulationsofsexhormonesorsexchromosomecopynumberinmice
AT martincamilles sexdifferencesincircadianfoodanticipatoryactivityarenotalteredbyindividualmanipulationsofsexhormonesorsexchromosomecopynumberinmice
AT huddytimothyf sexdifferencesincircadianfoodanticipatoryactivityarenotalteredbyindividualmanipulationsofsexhormonesorsexchromosomecopynumberinmice
AT ogawaokadamaya sexdifferencesincircadianfoodanticipatoryactivityarenotalteredbyindividualmanipulationsofsexhormonesorsexchromosomecopynumberinmice
AT adkinsjamiel sexdifferencesincircadianfoodanticipatoryactivityarenotalteredbyindividualmanipulationsofsexhormonesorsexchromosomecopynumberinmice
AT steeleandrewd sexdifferencesincircadianfoodanticipatoryactivityarenotalteredbyindividualmanipulationsofsexhormonesorsexchromosomecopynumberinmice