Cargando…
The impact of selection bias in randomized multi-arm parallel group clinical trials
The impact of selection bias on the results of clinical trials has been analyzed extensively for trials of two treatments, yet its impact in multi-arm trials is still unknown. In this paper, we investigate selection bias in multi-arm trials by its impact on the type I error probability. We propose t...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5792025/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29385190 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192065 |
_version_ | 1783296697795870720 |
---|---|
author | Uschner, Diane Hilgers, Ralf-Dieter Heussen, Nicole |
author_facet | Uschner, Diane Hilgers, Ralf-Dieter Heussen, Nicole |
author_sort | Uschner, Diane |
collection | PubMed |
description | The impact of selection bias on the results of clinical trials has been analyzed extensively for trials of two treatments, yet its impact in multi-arm trials is still unknown. In this paper, we investigate selection bias in multi-arm trials by its impact on the type I error probability. We propose two models for selection bias, so-called biasing policies, that both extend the classic guessing strategy by Blackwell and Hodges. We derive the distribution of the F-test statistic under the misspecified outcome model and provide a formula for the type I error probability under selection bias. We apply the presented approach to quantify the influence of selection bias in multi-arm trials with increasing number of treatment groups using a permuted block design for different assumptions and different biasing strategies. Our results confirm previous findings that smaller block sizes lead to a higher proportion of sequences with inflated type I error probability. Astonishingly, our results also show that the proportion of sequences with inflated type I error probability remains constant when the number of treatment groups is increased. Realizing that the impact of selection bias cannot be completely eliminated, we propose a bias adjusted statistical model and show that the power of the statistical test is only slightly deflated for larger block sizes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5792025 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57920252018-02-09 The impact of selection bias in randomized multi-arm parallel group clinical trials Uschner, Diane Hilgers, Ralf-Dieter Heussen, Nicole PLoS One Research Article The impact of selection bias on the results of clinical trials has been analyzed extensively for trials of two treatments, yet its impact in multi-arm trials is still unknown. In this paper, we investigate selection bias in multi-arm trials by its impact on the type I error probability. We propose two models for selection bias, so-called biasing policies, that both extend the classic guessing strategy by Blackwell and Hodges. We derive the distribution of the F-test statistic under the misspecified outcome model and provide a formula for the type I error probability under selection bias. We apply the presented approach to quantify the influence of selection bias in multi-arm trials with increasing number of treatment groups using a permuted block design for different assumptions and different biasing strategies. Our results confirm previous findings that smaller block sizes lead to a higher proportion of sequences with inflated type I error probability. Astonishingly, our results also show that the proportion of sequences with inflated type I error probability remains constant when the number of treatment groups is increased. Realizing that the impact of selection bias cannot be completely eliminated, we propose a bias adjusted statistical model and show that the power of the statistical test is only slightly deflated for larger block sizes. Public Library of Science 2018-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5792025/ /pubmed/29385190 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192065 Text en © 2018 Uschner et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Uschner, Diane Hilgers, Ralf-Dieter Heussen, Nicole The impact of selection bias in randomized multi-arm parallel group clinical trials |
title | The impact of selection bias in randomized multi-arm parallel group clinical trials |
title_full | The impact of selection bias in randomized multi-arm parallel group clinical trials |
title_fullStr | The impact of selection bias in randomized multi-arm parallel group clinical trials |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of selection bias in randomized multi-arm parallel group clinical trials |
title_short | The impact of selection bias in randomized multi-arm parallel group clinical trials |
title_sort | impact of selection bias in randomized multi-arm parallel group clinical trials |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5792025/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29385190 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192065 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT uschnerdiane theimpactofselectionbiasinrandomizedmultiarmparallelgroupclinicaltrials AT hilgersralfdieter theimpactofselectionbiasinrandomizedmultiarmparallelgroupclinicaltrials AT heussennicole theimpactofselectionbiasinrandomizedmultiarmparallelgroupclinicaltrials AT uschnerdiane impactofselectionbiasinrandomizedmultiarmparallelgroupclinicaltrials AT hilgersralfdieter impactofselectionbiasinrandomizedmultiarmparallelgroupclinicaltrials AT heussennicole impactofselectionbiasinrandomizedmultiarmparallelgroupclinicaltrials |