Cargando…

Polygyny does not explain the superior competitive ability of dominant ant associates in the African ant‐plant, Acacia (Vachellia) drepanolobium

The Acacia drepanolobium (also known as Vachellia drepanolobium) ant‐plant symbiosis is considered a classic case of species coexistence, in which four species of tree‐defending ants compete for nesting space in a single host tree species. Coexistence in this system has been explained by trade‐offs...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boyle, John H., Martins, Dino J., Pelaez, Julianne, Musili, Paul M., Kibet, Staline, Ndung'u, S. Kimani, Kenfack, David, Pierce, Naomi E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5792509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29435223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3752
_version_ 1783296752141467648
author Boyle, John H.
Martins, Dino J.
Pelaez, Julianne
Musili, Paul M.
Kibet, Staline
Ndung'u, S. Kimani
Kenfack, David
Pierce, Naomi E.
author_facet Boyle, John H.
Martins, Dino J.
Pelaez, Julianne
Musili, Paul M.
Kibet, Staline
Ndung'u, S. Kimani
Kenfack, David
Pierce, Naomi E.
author_sort Boyle, John H.
collection PubMed
description The Acacia drepanolobium (also known as Vachellia drepanolobium) ant‐plant symbiosis is considered a classic case of species coexistence, in which four species of tree‐defending ants compete for nesting space in a single host tree species. Coexistence in this system has been explained by trade‐offs in the ability of the ant associates to compete with each other for occupied trees versus the ability to colonize unoccupied trees. We seek to understand the proximal reasons for how and why the ant species vary in competitive or colonizing abilities, which are largely unknown. In this study, we use RADseq‐derived SNPs to identify relatedness of workers in colonies to test the hypothesis that competitively dominant ants reach large colony sizes due to polygyny, that is, the presence of multiple egg‐laying queens in a single colony. We find that variation in polygyny is not associated with competitive ability; in fact, the most dominant species, unexpectedly, showed little evidence of polygyny. We also use these markers to investigate variation in mating behavior among the ant species and find that different species vary in the number of males fathering the offspring of each colony. Finally, we show that the nature of polygyny varies between the two commonly polygynous species, Crematogaster mimosae and Tetraponera penzigi: in C. mimosae, queens in the same colony are often related, while this is not the case for T. penzigi. These results shed light on factors influencing the evolution of species coexistence in an ant‐plant mutualism, as well as demonstrating the effectiveness of RADseq‐derived SNPs for parentage analysis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5792509
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57925092018-02-12 Polygyny does not explain the superior competitive ability of dominant ant associates in the African ant‐plant, Acacia (Vachellia) drepanolobium Boyle, John H. Martins, Dino J. Pelaez, Julianne Musili, Paul M. Kibet, Staline Ndung'u, S. Kimani Kenfack, David Pierce, Naomi E. Ecol Evol Original Research The Acacia drepanolobium (also known as Vachellia drepanolobium) ant‐plant symbiosis is considered a classic case of species coexistence, in which four species of tree‐defending ants compete for nesting space in a single host tree species. Coexistence in this system has been explained by trade‐offs in the ability of the ant associates to compete with each other for occupied trees versus the ability to colonize unoccupied trees. We seek to understand the proximal reasons for how and why the ant species vary in competitive or colonizing abilities, which are largely unknown. In this study, we use RADseq‐derived SNPs to identify relatedness of workers in colonies to test the hypothesis that competitively dominant ants reach large colony sizes due to polygyny, that is, the presence of multiple egg‐laying queens in a single colony. We find that variation in polygyny is not associated with competitive ability; in fact, the most dominant species, unexpectedly, showed little evidence of polygyny. We also use these markers to investigate variation in mating behavior among the ant species and find that different species vary in the number of males fathering the offspring of each colony. Finally, we show that the nature of polygyny varies between the two commonly polygynous species, Crematogaster mimosae and Tetraponera penzigi: in C. mimosae, queens in the same colony are often related, while this is not the case for T. penzigi. These results shed light on factors influencing the evolution of species coexistence in an ant‐plant mutualism, as well as demonstrating the effectiveness of RADseq‐derived SNPs for parentage analysis. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5792509/ /pubmed/29435223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3752 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Boyle, John H.
Martins, Dino J.
Pelaez, Julianne
Musili, Paul M.
Kibet, Staline
Ndung'u, S. Kimani
Kenfack, David
Pierce, Naomi E.
Polygyny does not explain the superior competitive ability of dominant ant associates in the African ant‐plant, Acacia (Vachellia) drepanolobium
title Polygyny does not explain the superior competitive ability of dominant ant associates in the African ant‐plant, Acacia (Vachellia) drepanolobium
title_full Polygyny does not explain the superior competitive ability of dominant ant associates in the African ant‐plant, Acacia (Vachellia) drepanolobium
title_fullStr Polygyny does not explain the superior competitive ability of dominant ant associates in the African ant‐plant, Acacia (Vachellia) drepanolobium
title_full_unstemmed Polygyny does not explain the superior competitive ability of dominant ant associates in the African ant‐plant, Acacia (Vachellia) drepanolobium
title_short Polygyny does not explain the superior competitive ability of dominant ant associates in the African ant‐plant, Acacia (Vachellia) drepanolobium
title_sort polygyny does not explain the superior competitive ability of dominant ant associates in the african ant‐plant, acacia (vachellia) drepanolobium
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5792509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29435223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3752
work_keys_str_mv AT boylejohnh polygynydoesnotexplainthesuperiorcompetitiveabilityofdominantantassociatesintheafricanantplantacaciavachelliadrepanolobium
AT martinsdinoj polygynydoesnotexplainthesuperiorcompetitiveabilityofdominantantassociatesintheafricanantplantacaciavachelliadrepanolobium
AT pelaezjulianne polygynydoesnotexplainthesuperiorcompetitiveabilityofdominantantassociatesintheafricanantplantacaciavachelliadrepanolobium
AT musilipaulm polygynydoesnotexplainthesuperiorcompetitiveabilityofdominantantassociatesintheafricanantplantacaciavachelliadrepanolobium
AT kibetstaline polygynydoesnotexplainthesuperiorcompetitiveabilityofdominantantassociatesintheafricanantplantacaciavachelliadrepanolobium
AT ndunguskimani polygynydoesnotexplainthesuperiorcompetitiveabilityofdominantantassociatesintheafricanantplantacaciavachelliadrepanolobium
AT kenfackdavid polygynydoesnotexplainthesuperiorcompetitiveabilityofdominantantassociatesintheafricanantplantacaciavachelliadrepanolobium
AT piercenaomie polygynydoesnotexplainthesuperiorcompetitiveabilityofdominantantassociatesintheafricanantplantacaciavachelliadrepanolobium