Cargando…
Ecological drivers of song evolution in birds: Disentangling the effects of habitat and morphology
Environmental differences influence the evolutionary divergence of mating signals through selection acting either directly on signal transmission (“sensory drive”) or because morphological adaptation to different foraging niches causes divergence in “magic traits” associated with signal production,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5792612/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29435262 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3760 |
_version_ | 1783296773119279104 |
---|---|
author | Derryberry, Elizabeth Perrault Seddon, Nathalie Derryberry, Graham Earnest Claramunt, Santiago Seeholzer, Glenn Fairbanks Brumfield, Robb Thomas Tobias, Joseph Andrew |
author_facet | Derryberry, Elizabeth Perrault Seddon, Nathalie Derryberry, Graham Earnest Claramunt, Santiago Seeholzer, Glenn Fairbanks Brumfield, Robb Thomas Tobias, Joseph Andrew |
author_sort | Derryberry, Elizabeth Perrault |
collection | PubMed |
description | Environmental differences influence the evolutionary divergence of mating signals through selection acting either directly on signal transmission (“sensory drive”) or because morphological adaptation to different foraging niches causes divergence in “magic traits” associated with signal production, thus indirectly driving signal evolution. Sensory drive and magic traits both contribute to variation in signal structure, yet we have limited understanding of the relative role of these direct and indirect processes during signal evolution. Using phylogenetic analyses across 276 species of ovenbirds (Aves: Furnariidae), we compared the extent to which song evolution was related to the direct influence of habitat characteristics and the indirect effect of body size and beak size, two potential magic traits in birds. We find that indirect ecological selection, via diversification in putative magic traits, explains variation in temporal, spectral, and performance features of song. Body size influences song frequency, whereas beak size limits temporal and performance components of song. In comparison, direct ecological selection has weaker and more limited effects on song structure. Our results illustrate the importance of considering multiple deterministic processes in the evolution of mating signals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5792612 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57926122018-02-12 Ecological drivers of song evolution in birds: Disentangling the effects of habitat and morphology Derryberry, Elizabeth Perrault Seddon, Nathalie Derryberry, Graham Earnest Claramunt, Santiago Seeholzer, Glenn Fairbanks Brumfield, Robb Thomas Tobias, Joseph Andrew Ecol Evol Original Research Environmental differences influence the evolutionary divergence of mating signals through selection acting either directly on signal transmission (“sensory drive”) or because morphological adaptation to different foraging niches causes divergence in “magic traits” associated with signal production, thus indirectly driving signal evolution. Sensory drive and magic traits both contribute to variation in signal structure, yet we have limited understanding of the relative role of these direct and indirect processes during signal evolution. Using phylogenetic analyses across 276 species of ovenbirds (Aves: Furnariidae), we compared the extent to which song evolution was related to the direct influence of habitat characteristics and the indirect effect of body size and beak size, two potential magic traits in birds. We find that indirect ecological selection, via diversification in putative magic traits, explains variation in temporal, spectral, and performance features of song. Body size influences song frequency, whereas beak size limits temporal and performance components of song. In comparison, direct ecological selection has weaker and more limited effects on song structure. Our results illustrate the importance of considering multiple deterministic processes in the evolution of mating signals. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5792612/ /pubmed/29435262 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3760 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Derryberry, Elizabeth Perrault Seddon, Nathalie Derryberry, Graham Earnest Claramunt, Santiago Seeholzer, Glenn Fairbanks Brumfield, Robb Thomas Tobias, Joseph Andrew Ecological drivers of song evolution in birds: Disentangling the effects of habitat and morphology |
title | Ecological drivers of song evolution in birds: Disentangling the effects of habitat and morphology |
title_full | Ecological drivers of song evolution in birds: Disentangling the effects of habitat and morphology |
title_fullStr | Ecological drivers of song evolution in birds: Disentangling the effects of habitat and morphology |
title_full_unstemmed | Ecological drivers of song evolution in birds: Disentangling the effects of habitat and morphology |
title_short | Ecological drivers of song evolution in birds: Disentangling the effects of habitat and morphology |
title_sort | ecological drivers of song evolution in birds: disentangling the effects of habitat and morphology |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5792612/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29435262 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3760 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT derryberryelizabethperrault ecologicaldriversofsongevolutioninbirdsdisentanglingtheeffectsofhabitatandmorphology AT seddonnathalie ecologicaldriversofsongevolutioninbirdsdisentanglingtheeffectsofhabitatandmorphology AT derryberrygrahamearnest ecologicaldriversofsongevolutioninbirdsdisentanglingtheeffectsofhabitatandmorphology AT claramuntsantiago ecologicaldriversofsongevolutioninbirdsdisentanglingtheeffectsofhabitatandmorphology AT seeholzerglennfairbanks ecologicaldriversofsongevolutioninbirdsdisentanglingtheeffectsofhabitatandmorphology AT brumfieldrobbthomas ecologicaldriversofsongevolutioninbirdsdisentanglingtheeffectsofhabitatandmorphology AT tobiasjosephandrew ecologicaldriversofsongevolutioninbirdsdisentanglingtheeffectsofhabitatandmorphology |