Cargando…

Ecological drivers of song evolution in birds: Disentangling the effects of habitat and morphology

Environmental differences influence the evolutionary divergence of mating signals through selection acting either directly on signal transmission (“sensory drive”) or because morphological adaptation to different foraging niches causes divergence in “magic traits” associated with signal production,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Derryberry, Elizabeth Perrault, Seddon, Nathalie, Derryberry, Graham Earnest, Claramunt, Santiago, Seeholzer, Glenn Fairbanks, Brumfield, Robb Thomas, Tobias, Joseph Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5792612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29435262
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3760
_version_ 1783296773119279104
author Derryberry, Elizabeth Perrault
Seddon, Nathalie
Derryberry, Graham Earnest
Claramunt, Santiago
Seeholzer, Glenn Fairbanks
Brumfield, Robb Thomas
Tobias, Joseph Andrew
author_facet Derryberry, Elizabeth Perrault
Seddon, Nathalie
Derryberry, Graham Earnest
Claramunt, Santiago
Seeholzer, Glenn Fairbanks
Brumfield, Robb Thomas
Tobias, Joseph Andrew
author_sort Derryberry, Elizabeth Perrault
collection PubMed
description Environmental differences influence the evolutionary divergence of mating signals through selection acting either directly on signal transmission (“sensory drive”) or because morphological adaptation to different foraging niches causes divergence in “magic traits” associated with signal production, thus indirectly driving signal evolution. Sensory drive and magic traits both contribute to variation in signal structure, yet we have limited understanding of the relative role of these direct and indirect processes during signal evolution. Using phylogenetic analyses across 276 species of ovenbirds (Aves: Furnariidae), we compared the extent to which song evolution was related to the direct influence of habitat characteristics and the indirect effect of body size and beak size, two potential magic traits in birds. We find that indirect ecological selection, via diversification in putative magic traits, explains variation in temporal, spectral, and performance features of song. Body size influences song frequency, whereas beak size limits temporal and performance components of song. In comparison, direct ecological selection has weaker and more limited effects on song structure. Our results illustrate the importance of considering multiple deterministic processes in the evolution of mating signals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5792612
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57926122018-02-12 Ecological drivers of song evolution in birds: Disentangling the effects of habitat and morphology Derryberry, Elizabeth Perrault Seddon, Nathalie Derryberry, Graham Earnest Claramunt, Santiago Seeholzer, Glenn Fairbanks Brumfield, Robb Thomas Tobias, Joseph Andrew Ecol Evol Original Research Environmental differences influence the evolutionary divergence of mating signals through selection acting either directly on signal transmission (“sensory drive”) or because morphological adaptation to different foraging niches causes divergence in “magic traits” associated with signal production, thus indirectly driving signal evolution. Sensory drive and magic traits both contribute to variation in signal structure, yet we have limited understanding of the relative role of these direct and indirect processes during signal evolution. Using phylogenetic analyses across 276 species of ovenbirds (Aves: Furnariidae), we compared the extent to which song evolution was related to the direct influence of habitat characteristics and the indirect effect of body size and beak size, two potential magic traits in birds. We find that indirect ecological selection, via diversification in putative magic traits, explains variation in temporal, spectral, and performance features of song. Body size influences song frequency, whereas beak size limits temporal and performance components of song. In comparison, direct ecological selection has weaker and more limited effects on song structure. Our results illustrate the importance of considering multiple deterministic processes in the evolution of mating signals. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5792612/ /pubmed/29435262 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3760 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Derryberry, Elizabeth Perrault
Seddon, Nathalie
Derryberry, Graham Earnest
Claramunt, Santiago
Seeholzer, Glenn Fairbanks
Brumfield, Robb Thomas
Tobias, Joseph Andrew
Ecological drivers of song evolution in birds: Disentangling the effects of habitat and morphology
title Ecological drivers of song evolution in birds: Disentangling the effects of habitat and morphology
title_full Ecological drivers of song evolution in birds: Disentangling the effects of habitat and morphology
title_fullStr Ecological drivers of song evolution in birds: Disentangling the effects of habitat and morphology
title_full_unstemmed Ecological drivers of song evolution in birds: Disentangling the effects of habitat and morphology
title_short Ecological drivers of song evolution in birds: Disentangling the effects of habitat and morphology
title_sort ecological drivers of song evolution in birds: disentangling the effects of habitat and morphology
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5792612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29435262
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3760
work_keys_str_mv AT derryberryelizabethperrault ecologicaldriversofsongevolutioninbirdsdisentanglingtheeffectsofhabitatandmorphology
AT seddonnathalie ecologicaldriversofsongevolutioninbirdsdisentanglingtheeffectsofhabitatandmorphology
AT derryberrygrahamearnest ecologicaldriversofsongevolutioninbirdsdisentanglingtheeffectsofhabitatandmorphology
AT claramuntsantiago ecologicaldriversofsongevolutioninbirdsdisentanglingtheeffectsofhabitatandmorphology
AT seeholzerglennfairbanks ecologicaldriversofsongevolutioninbirdsdisentanglingtheeffectsofhabitatandmorphology
AT brumfieldrobbthomas ecologicaldriversofsongevolutioninbirdsdisentanglingtheeffectsofhabitatandmorphology
AT tobiasjosephandrew ecologicaldriversofsongevolutioninbirdsdisentanglingtheeffectsofhabitatandmorphology