Cargando…

High protein consumption in trained women: bad to the bone?

BACKGROUND: It has been posited that the consumption of extra protein (> 0.8 g/kg/d) may be deleterious to bone mineral content. However, there is no direct evidence to show that consuming a high-protein diet results in a demineralization of the skeleton. Thus, the primary endpoint of this random...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Antonio, Jose, Ellerbroek, Anya, Evans, Cassandra, Silver, Tobin, Peacock, Corey A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5793405/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29434529
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12970-018-0210-6
_version_ 1783296945073160192
author Antonio, Jose
Ellerbroek, Anya
Evans, Cassandra
Silver, Tobin
Peacock, Corey A.
author_facet Antonio, Jose
Ellerbroek, Anya
Evans, Cassandra
Silver, Tobin
Peacock, Corey A.
author_sort Antonio, Jose
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It has been posited that the consumption of extra protein (> 0.8 g/kg/d) may be deleterious to bone mineral content. However, there is no direct evidence to show that consuming a high-protein diet results in a demineralization of the skeleton. Thus, the primary endpoint of this randomized controlled trial was to determine if a high-protein diet affected various parameters of whole body and lumbar bone mineral content in exercise-trained women. METHODS: Twenty-four women volunteered for this 6-month investigation (n = 12 control, n = 12 high-protein). The control group was instructed to consume their habitual diet; however, the high-protein group was instructed to consume ≥2.2 g of protein per kilogram body weight daily (g/kg/d). Body composition was assessed via dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Subjects were instructed to keep a food diary via the mobile app MyFitnessPal®. Exercise or activity level was not controlled. Subjects were asked to maintain their current levels of exercise. RESULTS: During the 6-month treatment period, there was a significant difference in protein intake between the control and high-protein groups (mean±SD; control: 1.5±0.3, high-protein: 2.8±1.1 g/kg/d); however, there were no differences in the consumption total calories, carbohydrate or fat. Whole body bone mineral density did not change in the control (pre: 1.22±0.08, post: 1.22±0.09 g/cm(2)) or high-protein group (pre: 1.25±0.11, post: 1.24±0.10 g/cm(2)). Similarly, lumbar bone mineral density did not change in the control (pre: 1.08±0.16, post: 1.05±0.13 g/cm(2)) or high-protein group (pre: 1.07±0.11, post: 1.08±0.12 g/cm(2)). In addition, there were no changes in whole body or lumbar T-Scores in either group. Furthermore, there were no changes in fat mass or lean body mass. CONCLUSION: Despite an 87% higher protein intake (high-protein versus control), 6 months of a high-protein diet had no effect on whole body bone mineral density, lumbar bone mineral density, T-scores, lean body mass or fat mass.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5793405
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57934052018-02-12 High protein consumption in trained women: bad to the bone? Antonio, Jose Ellerbroek, Anya Evans, Cassandra Silver, Tobin Peacock, Corey A. J Int Soc Sports Nutr Research Article BACKGROUND: It has been posited that the consumption of extra protein (> 0.8 g/kg/d) may be deleterious to bone mineral content. However, there is no direct evidence to show that consuming a high-protein diet results in a demineralization of the skeleton. Thus, the primary endpoint of this randomized controlled trial was to determine if a high-protein diet affected various parameters of whole body and lumbar bone mineral content in exercise-trained women. METHODS: Twenty-four women volunteered for this 6-month investigation (n = 12 control, n = 12 high-protein). The control group was instructed to consume their habitual diet; however, the high-protein group was instructed to consume ≥2.2 g of protein per kilogram body weight daily (g/kg/d). Body composition was assessed via dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Subjects were instructed to keep a food diary via the mobile app MyFitnessPal®. Exercise or activity level was not controlled. Subjects were asked to maintain their current levels of exercise. RESULTS: During the 6-month treatment period, there was a significant difference in protein intake between the control and high-protein groups (mean±SD; control: 1.5±0.3, high-protein: 2.8±1.1 g/kg/d); however, there were no differences in the consumption total calories, carbohydrate or fat. Whole body bone mineral density did not change in the control (pre: 1.22±0.08, post: 1.22±0.09 g/cm(2)) or high-protein group (pre: 1.25±0.11, post: 1.24±0.10 g/cm(2)). Similarly, lumbar bone mineral density did not change in the control (pre: 1.08±0.16, post: 1.05±0.13 g/cm(2)) or high-protein group (pre: 1.07±0.11, post: 1.08±0.12 g/cm(2)). In addition, there were no changes in whole body or lumbar T-Scores in either group. Furthermore, there were no changes in fat mass or lean body mass. CONCLUSION: Despite an 87% higher protein intake (high-protein versus control), 6 months of a high-protein diet had no effect on whole body bone mineral density, lumbar bone mineral density, T-scores, lean body mass or fat mass. BioMed Central 2018-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5793405/ /pubmed/29434529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12970-018-0210-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Antonio, Jose
Ellerbroek, Anya
Evans, Cassandra
Silver, Tobin
Peacock, Corey A.
High protein consumption in trained women: bad to the bone?
title High protein consumption in trained women: bad to the bone?
title_full High protein consumption in trained women: bad to the bone?
title_fullStr High protein consumption in trained women: bad to the bone?
title_full_unstemmed High protein consumption in trained women: bad to the bone?
title_short High protein consumption in trained women: bad to the bone?
title_sort high protein consumption in trained women: bad to the bone?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5793405/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29434529
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12970-018-0210-6
work_keys_str_mv AT antoniojose highproteinconsumptionintrainedwomenbadtothebone
AT ellerbroekanya highproteinconsumptionintrainedwomenbadtothebone
AT evanscassandra highproteinconsumptionintrainedwomenbadtothebone
AT silvertobin highproteinconsumptionintrainedwomenbadtothebone
AT peacockcoreya highproteinconsumptionintrainedwomenbadtothebone