Cargando…
High protein consumption in trained women: bad to the bone?
BACKGROUND: It has been posited that the consumption of extra protein (> 0.8 g/kg/d) may be deleterious to bone mineral content. However, there is no direct evidence to show that consuming a high-protein diet results in a demineralization of the skeleton. Thus, the primary endpoint of this random...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5793405/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29434529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12970-018-0210-6 |
_version_ | 1783296945073160192 |
---|---|
author | Antonio, Jose Ellerbroek, Anya Evans, Cassandra Silver, Tobin Peacock, Corey A. |
author_facet | Antonio, Jose Ellerbroek, Anya Evans, Cassandra Silver, Tobin Peacock, Corey A. |
author_sort | Antonio, Jose |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: It has been posited that the consumption of extra protein (> 0.8 g/kg/d) may be deleterious to bone mineral content. However, there is no direct evidence to show that consuming a high-protein diet results in a demineralization of the skeleton. Thus, the primary endpoint of this randomized controlled trial was to determine if a high-protein diet affected various parameters of whole body and lumbar bone mineral content in exercise-trained women. METHODS: Twenty-four women volunteered for this 6-month investigation (n = 12 control, n = 12 high-protein). The control group was instructed to consume their habitual diet; however, the high-protein group was instructed to consume ≥2.2 g of protein per kilogram body weight daily (g/kg/d). Body composition was assessed via dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Subjects were instructed to keep a food diary via the mobile app MyFitnessPal®. Exercise or activity level was not controlled. Subjects were asked to maintain their current levels of exercise. RESULTS: During the 6-month treatment period, there was a significant difference in protein intake between the control and high-protein groups (mean±SD; control: 1.5±0.3, high-protein: 2.8±1.1 g/kg/d); however, there were no differences in the consumption total calories, carbohydrate or fat. Whole body bone mineral density did not change in the control (pre: 1.22±0.08, post: 1.22±0.09 g/cm(2)) or high-protein group (pre: 1.25±0.11, post: 1.24±0.10 g/cm(2)). Similarly, lumbar bone mineral density did not change in the control (pre: 1.08±0.16, post: 1.05±0.13 g/cm(2)) or high-protein group (pre: 1.07±0.11, post: 1.08±0.12 g/cm(2)). In addition, there were no changes in whole body or lumbar T-Scores in either group. Furthermore, there were no changes in fat mass or lean body mass. CONCLUSION: Despite an 87% higher protein intake (high-protein versus control), 6 months of a high-protein diet had no effect on whole body bone mineral density, lumbar bone mineral density, T-scores, lean body mass or fat mass. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5793405 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57934052018-02-12 High protein consumption in trained women: bad to the bone? Antonio, Jose Ellerbroek, Anya Evans, Cassandra Silver, Tobin Peacock, Corey A. J Int Soc Sports Nutr Research Article BACKGROUND: It has been posited that the consumption of extra protein (> 0.8 g/kg/d) may be deleterious to bone mineral content. However, there is no direct evidence to show that consuming a high-protein diet results in a demineralization of the skeleton. Thus, the primary endpoint of this randomized controlled trial was to determine if a high-protein diet affected various parameters of whole body and lumbar bone mineral content in exercise-trained women. METHODS: Twenty-four women volunteered for this 6-month investigation (n = 12 control, n = 12 high-protein). The control group was instructed to consume their habitual diet; however, the high-protein group was instructed to consume ≥2.2 g of protein per kilogram body weight daily (g/kg/d). Body composition was assessed via dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Subjects were instructed to keep a food diary via the mobile app MyFitnessPal®. Exercise or activity level was not controlled. Subjects were asked to maintain their current levels of exercise. RESULTS: During the 6-month treatment period, there was a significant difference in protein intake between the control and high-protein groups (mean±SD; control: 1.5±0.3, high-protein: 2.8±1.1 g/kg/d); however, there were no differences in the consumption total calories, carbohydrate or fat. Whole body bone mineral density did not change in the control (pre: 1.22±0.08, post: 1.22±0.09 g/cm(2)) or high-protein group (pre: 1.25±0.11, post: 1.24±0.10 g/cm(2)). Similarly, lumbar bone mineral density did not change in the control (pre: 1.08±0.16, post: 1.05±0.13 g/cm(2)) or high-protein group (pre: 1.07±0.11, post: 1.08±0.12 g/cm(2)). In addition, there were no changes in whole body or lumbar T-Scores in either group. Furthermore, there were no changes in fat mass or lean body mass. CONCLUSION: Despite an 87% higher protein intake (high-protein versus control), 6 months of a high-protein diet had no effect on whole body bone mineral density, lumbar bone mineral density, T-scores, lean body mass or fat mass. BioMed Central 2018-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5793405/ /pubmed/29434529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12970-018-0210-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Antonio, Jose Ellerbroek, Anya Evans, Cassandra Silver, Tobin Peacock, Corey A. High protein consumption in trained women: bad to the bone? |
title | High protein consumption in trained women: bad to the bone? |
title_full | High protein consumption in trained women: bad to the bone? |
title_fullStr | High protein consumption in trained women: bad to the bone? |
title_full_unstemmed | High protein consumption in trained women: bad to the bone? |
title_short | High protein consumption in trained women: bad to the bone? |
title_sort | high protein consumption in trained women: bad to the bone? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5793405/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29434529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12970-018-0210-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT antoniojose highproteinconsumptionintrainedwomenbadtothebone AT ellerbroekanya highproteinconsumptionintrainedwomenbadtothebone AT evanscassandra highproteinconsumptionintrainedwomenbadtothebone AT silvertobin highproteinconsumptionintrainedwomenbadtothebone AT peacockcoreya highproteinconsumptionintrainedwomenbadtothebone |