Cargando…

Economic evaluations of lymphatic filariasis interventions: a systematic review and research needs

In 2000, the World Health Organization established the Global Programme to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis (GPELF), with the goal of eliminating the disease as a public health problem by 2020. Since the start of the programme, a cumulative total of 6.2 billion treatments have been delivered to affect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gedge, Lukyn M., Bettis, Alison A., Bradley, Mark H., Hollingsworth, T. Déirdre, Turner, Hugo C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5793442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29391042
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-018-2616-z
_version_ 1783296954008076288
author Gedge, Lukyn M.
Bettis, Alison A.
Bradley, Mark H.
Hollingsworth, T. Déirdre
Turner, Hugo C.
author_facet Gedge, Lukyn M.
Bettis, Alison A.
Bradley, Mark H.
Hollingsworth, T. Déirdre
Turner, Hugo C.
author_sort Gedge, Lukyn M.
collection PubMed
description In 2000, the World Health Organization established the Global Programme to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis (GPELF), with the goal of eliminating the disease as a public health problem by 2020. Since the start of the programme, a cumulative total of 6.2 billion treatments have been delivered to affected populations - with more than 556 million people treated in 2015 alone. In this paper, we perform a rigorous systematic review of the economic evaluations of lymphatic filariasis interventions have been conducted. We demonstrate that the standard interventions to control lymphatic filariasis are consistently found to be highly cost-effective. This finding has important implications for advocacy groups and potential funders. However, there are several important inconsistencies and research gaps that need to be addressed as we move forward towards the 2020 elimination goals. One of the most important identified research gaps was a lack of evaluation of new interventions specifically targeting areas co-endemic with onchocerciasis and Loa loa - which could become a major barrier to achieving elimination. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13071-018-2616-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5793442
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57934422018-02-12 Economic evaluations of lymphatic filariasis interventions: a systematic review and research needs Gedge, Lukyn M. Bettis, Alison A. Bradley, Mark H. Hollingsworth, T. Déirdre Turner, Hugo C. Parasit Vectors Review In 2000, the World Health Organization established the Global Programme to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis (GPELF), with the goal of eliminating the disease as a public health problem by 2020. Since the start of the programme, a cumulative total of 6.2 billion treatments have been delivered to affected populations - with more than 556 million people treated in 2015 alone. In this paper, we perform a rigorous systematic review of the economic evaluations of lymphatic filariasis interventions have been conducted. We demonstrate that the standard interventions to control lymphatic filariasis are consistently found to be highly cost-effective. This finding has important implications for advocacy groups and potential funders. However, there are several important inconsistencies and research gaps that need to be addressed as we move forward towards the 2020 elimination goals. One of the most important identified research gaps was a lack of evaluation of new interventions specifically targeting areas co-endemic with onchocerciasis and Loa loa - which could become a major barrier to achieving elimination. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13071-018-2616-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5793442/ /pubmed/29391042 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-018-2616-z Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Gedge, Lukyn M.
Bettis, Alison A.
Bradley, Mark H.
Hollingsworth, T. Déirdre
Turner, Hugo C.
Economic evaluations of lymphatic filariasis interventions: a systematic review and research needs
title Economic evaluations of lymphatic filariasis interventions: a systematic review and research needs
title_full Economic evaluations of lymphatic filariasis interventions: a systematic review and research needs
title_fullStr Economic evaluations of lymphatic filariasis interventions: a systematic review and research needs
title_full_unstemmed Economic evaluations of lymphatic filariasis interventions: a systematic review and research needs
title_short Economic evaluations of lymphatic filariasis interventions: a systematic review and research needs
title_sort economic evaluations of lymphatic filariasis interventions: a systematic review and research needs
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5793442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29391042
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-018-2616-z
work_keys_str_mv AT gedgelukynm economicevaluationsoflymphaticfilariasisinterventionsasystematicreviewandresearchneeds
AT bettisalisona economicevaluationsoflymphaticfilariasisinterventionsasystematicreviewandresearchneeds
AT bradleymarkh economicevaluationsoflymphaticfilariasisinterventionsasystematicreviewandresearchneeds
AT hollingsworthtdeirdre economicevaluationsoflymphaticfilariasisinterventionsasystematicreviewandresearchneeds
AT turnerhugoc economicevaluationsoflymphaticfilariasisinterventionsasystematicreviewandresearchneeds