Cargando…

Comparative Evaluation of Corneal Endothelium in Diabetic Patients Undergoing Phacoemulsification

PURPOSE: To determine if phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation has a greater impact on the corneal endothelium of type 2 diabetic patients as compared to nondiabetics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study compared the endothelial status in 60 diabetics with good glycemic control and 60...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sahu, Pramod Kumar, Das, Gopal Krushna, Agrawal, Sumeet, Kumar, Sabitabh, Kumar, Nitish
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5793451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29422754
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/meajo.MEAJO_212_16
_version_ 1783296956130394112
author Sahu, Pramod Kumar
Das, Gopal Krushna
Agrawal, Sumeet
Kumar, Sabitabh
Kumar, Nitish
author_facet Sahu, Pramod Kumar
Das, Gopal Krushna
Agrawal, Sumeet
Kumar, Sabitabh
Kumar, Nitish
author_sort Sahu, Pramod Kumar
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To determine if phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation has a greater impact on the corneal endothelium of type 2 diabetic patients as compared to nondiabetics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study compared the endothelial status in 60 diabetics with good glycemic control and 60 nondiabetics before and after uneventful phacoemulsification. Central corneal endothelial cell density, percentage hexagonality and percentage coefficient of variation (%CV) were measured using a specular microscope. RESULTS: Data were age and sex matched. Diabetics showed significantly higher loss in endothelial cell count as compared to nondiabetics. At the end of 3 months, there was a decline of 157 endothelial cell (standard deviation [SD] 90) in the diabetic group and 121 (SD 50) in the control group. This was statistically significant (P = 0.008). Furthermore, the diabetics showed a slower recovery trend in the endothelial healing response as evidenced by lower change in the %CV. The change in %CV was 4.5 in the control group and 3.1 in diabetic group which was statistically significant (P = 0.016). Significant correlation was found between energy used and change in endothelial count as well as %CV in nondiabetics only. CONCLUSION: In spite of good glycemic control, diabetics have significantly more endothelial damage in comparison to nondiabetics with similar nuclear grading and phaco energy used. This warrants a more careful use of phaco energy in diabetics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5793451
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57934512018-02-08 Comparative Evaluation of Corneal Endothelium in Diabetic Patients Undergoing Phacoemulsification Sahu, Pramod Kumar Das, Gopal Krushna Agrawal, Sumeet Kumar, Sabitabh Kumar, Nitish Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: To determine if phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation has a greater impact on the corneal endothelium of type 2 diabetic patients as compared to nondiabetics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study compared the endothelial status in 60 diabetics with good glycemic control and 60 nondiabetics before and after uneventful phacoemulsification. Central corneal endothelial cell density, percentage hexagonality and percentage coefficient of variation (%CV) were measured using a specular microscope. RESULTS: Data were age and sex matched. Diabetics showed significantly higher loss in endothelial cell count as compared to nondiabetics. At the end of 3 months, there was a decline of 157 endothelial cell (standard deviation [SD] 90) in the diabetic group and 121 (SD 50) in the control group. This was statistically significant (P = 0.008). Furthermore, the diabetics showed a slower recovery trend in the endothelial healing response as evidenced by lower change in the %CV. The change in %CV was 4.5 in the control group and 3.1 in diabetic group which was statistically significant (P = 0.016). Significant correlation was found between energy used and change in endothelial count as well as %CV in nondiabetics only. CONCLUSION: In spite of good glycemic control, diabetics have significantly more endothelial damage in comparison to nondiabetics with similar nuclear grading and phaco energy used. This warrants a more careful use of phaco energy in diabetics. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5793451/ /pubmed/29422754 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/meajo.MEAJO_212_16 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sahu, Pramod Kumar
Das, Gopal Krushna
Agrawal, Sumeet
Kumar, Sabitabh
Kumar, Nitish
Comparative Evaluation of Corneal Endothelium in Diabetic Patients Undergoing Phacoemulsification
title Comparative Evaluation of Corneal Endothelium in Diabetic Patients Undergoing Phacoemulsification
title_full Comparative Evaluation of Corneal Endothelium in Diabetic Patients Undergoing Phacoemulsification
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of Corneal Endothelium in Diabetic Patients Undergoing Phacoemulsification
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of Corneal Endothelium in Diabetic Patients Undergoing Phacoemulsification
title_short Comparative Evaluation of Corneal Endothelium in Diabetic Patients Undergoing Phacoemulsification
title_sort comparative evaluation of corneal endothelium in diabetic patients undergoing phacoemulsification
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5793451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29422754
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/meajo.MEAJO_212_16
work_keys_str_mv AT sahupramodkumar comparativeevaluationofcornealendotheliumindiabeticpatientsundergoingphacoemulsification
AT dasgopalkrushna comparativeevaluationofcornealendotheliumindiabeticpatientsundergoingphacoemulsification
AT agrawalsumeet comparativeevaluationofcornealendotheliumindiabeticpatientsundergoingphacoemulsification
AT kumarsabitabh comparativeevaluationofcornealendotheliumindiabeticpatientsundergoingphacoemulsification
AT kumarnitish comparativeevaluationofcornealendotheliumindiabeticpatientsundergoingphacoemulsification