Cargando…
The Components of Bone and What They Can Teach Us about Regeneration
The problem of bone regeneration has engaged both physicians and scientists since the beginning of medicine. Not only can bone heal itself following most injuries, but when it does, the regenerated tissue is often indistinguishable from healthy bone. Problems arise, however, when bone does not heal...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5793512/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29271933 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma11010014 |
_version_ | 1783296969188311040 |
---|---|
author | Le, Bach Quang Nurcombe, Victor Cool, Simon McKenzie van Blitterswijk, Clemens A. de Boer, Jan LaPointe, Vanessa Lydia Simone |
author_facet | Le, Bach Quang Nurcombe, Victor Cool, Simon McKenzie van Blitterswijk, Clemens A. de Boer, Jan LaPointe, Vanessa Lydia Simone |
author_sort | Le, Bach Quang |
collection | PubMed |
description | The problem of bone regeneration has engaged both physicians and scientists since the beginning of medicine. Not only can bone heal itself following most injuries, but when it does, the regenerated tissue is often indistinguishable from healthy bone. Problems arise, however, when bone does not heal properly, or when new tissue is needed, such as when two vertebrae are required to fuse to stabilize adjacent spine segments. Despite centuries of research, such procedures still require improved therapeutic methods to be devised. Autologous bone harvesting and grafting is currently still the accepted benchmark, despite drawbacks for clinicians and patients that include limited amounts, donor site morbidity, and variable quality. The necessity for an alternative to this “gold standard” has given rise to a bone-graft and substitute industry, with its central conundrum: what is the best way to regenerate bone? In this review, we dissect bone anatomy to summarize our current understanding of its constituents. We then look at how various components have been employed to improve bone regeneration. Evolving strategies for bone regeneration are then considered. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5793512 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57935122018-02-07 The Components of Bone and What They Can Teach Us about Regeneration Le, Bach Quang Nurcombe, Victor Cool, Simon McKenzie van Blitterswijk, Clemens A. de Boer, Jan LaPointe, Vanessa Lydia Simone Materials (Basel) Review The problem of bone regeneration has engaged both physicians and scientists since the beginning of medicine. Not only can bone heal itself following most injuries, but when it does, the regenerated tissue is often indistinguishable from healthy bone. Problems arise, however, when bone does not heal properly, or when new tissue is needed, such as when two vertebrae are required to fuse to stabilize adjacent spine segments. Despite centuries of research, such procedures still require improved therapeutic methods to be devised. Autologous bone harvesting and grafting is currently still the accepted benchmark, despite drawbacks for clinicians and patients that include limited amounts, donor site morbidity, and variable quality. The necessity for an alternative to this “gold standard” has given rise to a bone-graft and substitute industry, with its central conundrum: what is the best way to regenerate bone? In this review, we dissect bone anatomy to summarize our current understanding of its constituents. We then look at how various components have been employed to improve bone regeneration. Evolving strategies for bone regeneration are then considered. MDPI 2017-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5793512/ /pubmed/29271933 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma11010014 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Le, Bach Quang Nurcombe, Victor Cool, Simon McKenzie van Blitterswijk, Clemens A. de Boer, Jan LaPointe, Vanessa Lydia Simone The Components of Bone and What They Can Teach Us about Regeneration |
title | The Components of Bone and What They Can Teach Us about Regeneration |
title_full | The Components of Bone and What They Can Teach Us about Regeneration |
title_fullStr | The Components of Bone and What They Can Teach Us about Regeneration |
title_full_unstemmed | The Components of Bone and What They Can Teach Us about Regeneration |
title_short | The Components of Bone and What They Can Teach Us about Regeneration |
title_sort | components of bone and what they can teach us about regeneration |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5793512/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29271933 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma11010014 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lebachquang thecomponentsofboneandwhattheycanteachusaboutregeneration AT nurcombevictor thecomponentsofboneandwhattheycanteachusaboutregeneration AT coolsimonmckenzie thecomponentsofboneandwhattheycanteachusaboutregeneration AT vanblitterswijkclemensa thecomponentsofboneandwhattheycanteachusaboutregeneration AT deboerjan thecomponentsofboneandwhattheycanteachusaboutregeneration AT lapointevanessalydiasimone thecomponentsofboneandwhattheycanteachusaboutregeneration AT lebachquang componentsofboneandwhattheycanteachusaboutregeneration AT nurcombevictor componentsofboneandwhattheycanteachusaboutregeneration AT coolsimonmckenzie componentsofboneandwhattheycanteachusaboutregeneration AT vanblitterswijkclemensa componentsofboneandwhattheycanteachusaboutregeneration AT deboerjan componentsofboneandwhattheycanteachusaboutregeneration AT lapointevanessalydiasimone componentsofboneandwhattheycanteachusaboutregeneration |