Cargando…

Is the voice an auditory face? An ALE meta-analysis comparing vocal and facial emotion processing

This meta-analysis compares the brain structures and mechanisms involved in facial and vocal emotion recognition. Neuroimaging studies contrasting emotional with neutral (face: N = 76, voice: N = 34) and explicit with implicit emotion processing (face: N = 27, voice: N = 20) were collected to shed l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Schirmer, Annett
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5793823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29186621
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsx142
_version_ 1783297028635230208
author Schirmer, Annett
author_facet Schirmer, Annett
author_sort Schirmer, Annett
collection PubMed
description This meta-analysis compares the brain structures and mechanisms involved in facial and vocal emotion recognition. Neuroimaging studies contrasting emotional with neutral (face: N = 76, voice: N = 34) and explicit with implicit emotion processing (face: N = 27, voice: N = 20) were collected to shed light on stimulus and goal-driven mechanisms, respectively. Activation likelihood estimations were conducted on the full data sets for the separate modalities and on reduced, modality-matched data sets for modality comparison. Stimulus-driven emotion processing engaged large networks with significant modality differences in the superior temporal (voice-specific) and the medial temporal (face-specific) cortex. Goal-driven processing was associated with only a small cluster in the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex for voices but not faces. Neither stimulus- nor goal-driven processing showed significant modality overlap. Together, these findings suggest that stimulus-driven processes shape activity in the social brain more powerfully than goal-driven processes in both the visual and the auditory domains. Yet, whereas faces emphasize subcortical emotional and mnemonic mechanisms, voices emphasize cortical mechanisms associated with perception and effortful stimulus evaluation (e.g. via subvocalization). These differences may be due to sensory stimulus properties and highlight the need for a modality-specific perspective when modeling emotion processing in the brain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5793823
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57938232018-02-06 Is the voice an auditory face? An ALE meta-analysis comparing vocal and facial emotion processing Schirmer, Annett Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci Original Articles This meta-analysis compares the brain structures and mechanisms involved in facial and vocal emotion recognition. Neuroimaging studies contrasting emotional with neutral (face: N = 76, voice: N = 34) and explicit with implicit emotion processing (face: N = 27, voice: N = 20) were collected to shed light on stimulus and goal-driven mechanisms, respectively. Activation likelihood estimations were conducted on the full data sets for the separate modalities and on reduced, modality-matched data sets for modality comparison. Stimulus-driven emotion processing engaged large networks with significant modality differences in the superior temporal (voice-specific) and the medial temporal (face-specific) cortex. Goal-driven processing was associated with only a small cluster in the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex for voices but not faces. Neither stimulus- nor goal-driven processing showed significant modality overlap. Together, these findings suggest that stimulus-driven processes shape activity in the social brain more powerfully than goal-driven processes in both the visual and the auditory domains. Yet, whereas faces emphasize subcortical emotional and mnemonic mechanisms, voices emphasize cortical mechanisms associated with perception and effortful stimulus evaluation (e.g. via subvocalization). These differences may be due to sensory stimulus properties and highlight the need for a modality-specific perspective when modeling emotion processing in the brain. Oxford University Press 2018-01 2017-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5793823/ /pubmed/29186621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsx142 Text en © The Author (2017). Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Articles
Schirmer, Annett
Is the voice an auditory face? An ALE meta-analysis comparing vocal and facial emotion processing
title Is the voice an auditory face? An ALE meta-analysis comparing vocal and facial emotion processing
title_full Is the voice an auditory face? An ALE meta-analysis comparing vocal and facial emotion processing
title_fullStr Is the voice an auditory face? An ALE meta-analysis comparing vocal and facial emotion processing
title_full_unstemmed Is the voice an auditory face? An ALE meta-analysis comparing vocal and facial emotion processing
title_short Is the voice an auditory face? An ALE meta-analysis comparing vocal and facial emotion processing
title_sort is the voice an auditory face? an ale meta-analysis comparing vocal and facial emotion processing
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5793823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29186621
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsx142
work_keys_str_mv AT schirmerannett isthevoiceanauditoryfaceanalemetaanalysiscomparingvocalandfacialemotionprocessing