Cargando…
In‐hospital worsening heart failure: a clinically relevant endpoint?
Outcome measures used for the clinical evaluation of patients with acute heart failure differ between studies and may neither adequately address the characteristic presenting symptoms and signs nor reflect the pathophysiological processes involved. In‐hospital worsening of heart failure (WHF) is ass...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5793965/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29385659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12195 |
_version_ | 1783297040349921280 |
---|---|
author | Clark, Andrew L. Cherif, Myriam McDonagh, Theresa A. Squire, Iain B. |
author_facet | Clark, Andrew L. Cherif, Myriam McDonagh, Theresa A. Squire, Iain B. |
author_sort | Clark, Andrew L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Outcome measures used for the clinical evaluation of patients with acute heart failure differ between studies and may neither adequately address the characteristic presenting symptoms and signs nor reflect the pathophysiological processes involved. In‐hospital worsening of heart failure (WHF) is associated with poor outcomes and thus a potential endpoint conveying clinically meaningful prognostic information. Current definitions of WHF are based on the combination of worsening symptoms and signs and the intensification of treatment during admission. Definitions vary across studies and do not fully account for baseline therapy or circumstances in which there is failure to respond to treatment. Further, there are limited data to inform healthcare professionals as to which patients are most at risk of developing in‐hospital WHF. In this opinion piece, we review the definitions for WHF used in recent and ongoing clinical trials and propose a novel definition, which captures failure to respond to treatment as well as clinical worsening (deterioration of symptoms and signs) of the patient's condition. Such a definition, applied consistently across studies, would help clarify the characteristics of patients likely to develop in‐hospital WHF, allow comparative assessments of the effectiveness of interventions, and help guide appropriate patient management in order to improve outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5793965 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57939652018-02-14 In‐hospital worsening heart failure: a clinically relevant endpoint? Clark, Andrew L. Cherif, Myriam McDonagh, Theresa A. Squire, Iain B. ESC Heart Fail Review Outcome measures used for the clinical evaluation of patients with acute heart failure differ between studies and may neither adequately address the characteristic presenting symptoms and signs nor reflect the pathophysiological processes involved. In‐hospital worsening of heart failure (WHF) is associated with poor outcomes and thus a potential endpoint conveying clinically meaningful prognostic information. Current definitions of WHF are based on the combination of worsening symptoms and signs and the intensification of treatment during admission. Definitions vary across studies and do not fully account for baseline therapy or circumstances in which there is failure to respond to treatment. Further, there are limited data to inform healthcare professionals as to which patients are most at risk of developing in‐hospital WHF. In this opinion piece, we review the definitions for WHF used in recent and ongoing clinical trials and propose a novel definition, which captures failure to respond to treatment as well as clinical worsening (deterioration of symptoms and signs) of the patient's condition. Such a definition, applied consistently across studies, would help clarify the characteristics of patients likely to develop in‐hospital WHF, allow comparative assessments of the effectiveness of interventions, and help guide appropriate patient management in order to improve outcomes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5793965/ /pubmed/29385659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12195 Text en © 2017 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Review Clark, Andrew L. Cherif, Myriam McDonagh, Theresa A. Squire, Iain B. In‐hospital worsening heart failure: a clinically relevant endpoint? |
title | In‐hospital worsening heart failure: a clinically relevant endpoint? |
title_full | In‐hospital worsening heart failure: a clinically relevant endpoint? |
title_fullStr | In‐hospital worsening heart failure: a clinically relevant endpoint? |
title_full_unstemmed | In‐hospital worsening heart failure: a clinically relevant endpoint? |
title_short | In‐hospital worsening heart failure: a clinically relevant endpoint? |
title_sort | in‐hospital worsening heart failure: a clinically relevant endpoint? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5793965/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29385659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12195 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT clarkandrewl inhospitalworseningheartfailureaclinicallyrelevantendpoint AT cherifmyriam inhospitalworseningheartfailureaclinicallyrelevantendpoint AT mcdonaghtheresaa inhospitalworseningheartfailureaclinicallyrelevantendpoint AT squireiainb inhospitalworseningheartfailureaclinicallyrelevantendpoint |