Cargando…

In‐hospital worsening heart failure: a clinically relevant endpoint?

Outcome measures used for the clinical evaluation of patients with acute heart failure differ between studies and may neither adequately address the characteristic presenting symptoms and signs nor reflect the pathophysiological processes involved. In‐hospital worsening of heart failure (WHF) is ass...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clark, Andrew L., Cherif, Myriam, McDonagh, Theresa A., Squire, Iain B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5793965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29385659
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12195
_version_ 1783297040349921280
author Clark, Andrew L.
Cherif, Myriam
McDonagh, Theresa A.
Squire, Iain B.
author_facet Clark, Andrew L.
Cherif, Myriam
McDonagh, Theresa A.
Squire, Iain B.
author_sort Clark, Andrew L.
collection PubMed
description Outcome measures used for the clinical evaluation of patients with acute heart failure differ between studies and may neither adequately address the characteristic presenting symptoms and signs nor reflect the pathophysiological processes involved. In‐hospital worsening of heart failure (WHF) is associated with poor outcomes and thus a potential endpoint conveying clinically meaningful prognostic information. Current definitions of WHF are based on the combination of worsening symptoms and signs and the intensification of treatment during admission. Definitions vary across studies and do not fully account for baseline therapy or circumstances in which there is failure to respond to treatment. Further, there are limited data to inform healthcare professionals as to which patients are most at risk of developing in‐hospital WHF. In this opinion piece, we review the definitions for WHF used in recent and ongoing clinical trials and propose a novel definition, which captures failure to respond to treatment as well as clinical worsening (deterioration of symptoms and signs) of the patient's condition. Such a definition, applied consistently across studies, would help clarify the characteristics of patients likely to develop in‐hospital WHF, allow comparative assessments of the effectiveness of interventions, and help guide appropriate patient management in order to improve outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5793965
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57939652018-02-14 In‐hospital worsening heart failure: a clinically relevant endpoint? Clark, Andrew L. Cherif, Myriam McDonagh, Theresa A. Squire, Iain B. ESC Heart Fail Review Outcome measures used for the clinical evaluation of patients with acute heart failure differ between studies and may neither adequately address the characteristic presenting symptoms and signs nor reflect the pathophysiological processes involved. In‐hospital worsening of heart failure (WHF) is associated with poor outcomes and thus a potential endpoint conveying clinically meaningful prognostic information. Current definitions of WHF are based on the combination of worsening symptoms and signs and the intensification of treatment during admission. Definitions vary across studies and do not fully account for baseline therapy or circumstances in which there is failure to respond to treatment. Further, there are limited data to inform healthcare professionals as to which patients are most at risk of developing in‐hospital WHF. In this opinion piece, we review the definitions for WHF used in recent and ongoing clinical trials and propose a novel definition, which captures failure to respond to treatment as well as clinical worsening (deterioration of symptoms and signs) of the patient's condition. Such a definition, applied consistently across studies, would help clarify the characteristics of patients likely to develop in‐hospital WHF, allow comparative assessments of the effectiveness of interventions, and help guide appropriate patient management in order to improve outcomes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5793965/ /pubmed/29385659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12195 Text en © 2017 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Review
Clark, Andrew L.
Cherif, Myriam
McDonagh, Theresa A.
Squire, Iain B.
In‐hospital worsening heart failure: a clinically relevant endpoint?
title In‐hospital worsening heart failure: a clinically relevant endpoint?
title_full In‐hospital worsening heart failure: a clinically relevant endpoint?
title_fullStr In‐hospital worsening heart failure: a clinically relevant endpoint?
title_full_unstemmed In‐hospital worsening heart failure: a clinically relevant endpoint?
title_short In‐hospital worsening heart failure: a clinically relevant endpoint?
title_sort in‐hospital worsening heart failure: a clinically relevant endpoint?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5793965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29385659
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12195
work_keys_str_mv AT clarkandrewl inhospitalworseningheartfailureaclinicallyrelevantendpoint
AT cherifmyriam inhospitalworseningheartfailureaclinicallyrelevantendpoint
AT mcdonaghtheresaa inhospitalworseningheartfailureaclinicallyrelevantendpoint
AT squireiainb inhospitalworseningheartfailureaclinicallyrelevantendpoint