Cargando…
Propagation of errors in citation networks: a study involving the entire citation network of a widely cited paper published in, and later retracted from, the journal Nature
BACKGROUND: In about one in 10,000 cases, a published article is retracted. This very often means that the results it reports are flawed. Several authors have voiced concerns about the presence of retracted research in the memory of science. In particular, a retracted result is propagated by citing...
Autores principales: | van der Vet, Paul E., Nijveen, Harm |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5793988/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29451542 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41073-016-0008-5 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Count highly-cited papers instead of papers with h citations: use normalized citation counts and compare “like with like”!
por: Bornmann, Lutz, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
From Excessive Journal Self-Cites to Citation Stacking: Analysis of Journal Self-Citation Kinetics in Search for Journals, Which Boost Their Scientometric Indicators
por: Heneberg, Petr
Publicado: (2016) -
Citation analysis and dynamics of citation networks
por: Golosovsky, Michael
Publicado: (2019) -
Detecting anomalous citation groups in journal networks
por: Kojaku, Sadamori, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Continued use of retracted papers: Temporal trends in citations and (lack of) awareness of retractions shown in citation contexts in biomedicine
por: Hsiao, Tzu-Kun, et al.
Publicado: (2022)