Cargando…

Comparative evaluation between glass and polyethylene fiber reinforced composites: A review of the current literature

BACKGROUND: Fiber reinforced composite (FRC) is a promising class of material that gives clinicians alternative treatment options. There are many FRC products available in the market based on either glass or polyethylene fiber type. The aim of this study was to present a comparison between glass and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mangoush, Enas, Säilynoja, Eija, Prinssi, Roosa, Lassila, Lippo, Vallittu, Pekka K., Garoushi, Sufyan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5794118/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29410756
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.54205
_version_ 1783297064473460736
author Mangoush, Enas
Säilynoja, Eija
Prinssi, Roosa
Lassila, Lippo
Vallittu, Pekka K.
Garoushi, Sufyan
author_facet Mangoush, Enas
Säilynoja, Eija
Prinssi, Roosa
Lassila, Lippo
Vallittu, Pekka K.
Garoushi, Sufyan
author_sort Mangoush, Enas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Fiber reinforced composite (FRC) is a promising class of material that gives clinicians alternative treatment options. There are many FRC products available in the market based on either glass or polyethylene fiber type. The aim of this study was to present a comparison between glass and polyethylene fiber reinforced composites based on available literature review. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A thorough literature search, with no limitation, was done up to June 2017. The range of relevant publications was surveyed using PubMed and Google Scholar. From the search results, articles related to our search terms were only considered. An assessment of these articles was done by two individuals in order to include only articles directly compare between glass and polyethylene FRCs. The search terms used were “fiber reinforced dental composites” and “glass and polyethylene fibers in dentistry”. RESULTS: The search provided 276 titles. Full-text analysis was performed for 29 articles that met the inclusion criteria. Most were laboratory-based research with various test specimen designs prepared according to ISO standard or with extracted teeth and only three articles were clinical studies. Most of studies (n=23) found superior characteristics of glass FRCs over polyethylene FRCs. CONCLUSIONS: Significant reinforcement differences between commercial glass and polyethylene fiber reinforced composites were found. Key words:Fiber reinforced composite, glass fiber, polyethylene fiber.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5794118
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57941182018-02-06 Comparative evaluation between glass and polyethylene fiber reinforced composites: A review of the current literature Mangoush, Enas Säilynoja, Eija Prinssi, Roosa Lassila, Lippo Vallittu, Pekka K. Garoushi, Sufyan J Clin Exp Dent Research BACKGROUND: Fiber reinforced composite (FRC) is a promising class of material that gives clinicians alternative treatment options. There are many FRC products available in the market based on either glass or polyethylene fiber type. The aim of this study was to present a comparison between glass and polyethylene fiber reinforced composites based on available literature review. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A thorough literature search, with no limitation, was done up to June 2017. The range of relevant publications was surveyed using PubMed and Google Scholar. From the search results, articles related to our search terms were only considered. An assessment of these articles was done by two individuals in order to include only articles directly compare between glass and polyethylene FRCs. The search terms used were “fiber reinforced dental composites” and “glass and polyethylene fibers in dentistry”. RESULTS: The search provided 276 titles. Full-text analysis was performed for 29 articles that met the inclusion criteria. Most were laboratory-based research with various test specimen designs prepared according to ISO standard or with extracted teeth and only three articles were clinical studies. Most of studies (n=23) found superior characteristics of glass FRCs over polyethylene FRCs. CONCLUSIONS: Significant reinforcement differences between commercial glass and polyethylene fiber reinforced composites were found. Key words:Fiber reinforced composite, glass fiber, polyethylene fiber. Medicina Oral S.L. 2017-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5794118/ /pubmed/29410756 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.54205 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Mangoush, Enas
Säilynoja, Eija
Prinssi, Roosa
Lassila, Lippo
Vallittu, Pekka K.
Garoushi, Sufyan
Comparative evaluation between glass and polyethylene fiber reinforced composites: A review of the current literature
title Comparative evaluation between glass and polyethylene fiber reinforced composites: A review of the current literature
title_full Comparative evaluation between glass and polyethylene fiber reinforced composites: A review of the current literature
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation between glass and polyethylene fiber reinforced composites: A review of the current literature
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation between glass and polyethylene fiber reinforced composites: A review of the current literature
title_short Comparative evaluation between glass and polyethylene fiber reinforced composites: A review of the current literature
title_sort comparative evaluation between glass and polyethylene fiber reinforced composites: a review of the current literature
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5794118/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29410756
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.54205
work_keys_str_mv AT mangoushenas comparativeevaluationbetweenglassandpolyethylenefiberreinforcedcompositesareviewofthecurrentliterature
AT sailynojaeija comparativeevaluationbetweenglassandpolyethylenefiberreinforcedcompositesareviewofthecurrentliterature
AT prinssiroosa comparativeevaluationbetweenglassandpolyethylenefiberreinforcedcompositesareviewofthecurrentliterature
AT lassilalippo comparativeevaluationbetweenglassandpolyethylenefiberreinforcedcompositesareviewofthecurrentliterature
AT vallittupekkak comparativeevaluationbetweenglassandpolyethylenefiberreinforcedcompositesareviewofthecurrentliterature
AT garoushisufyan comparativeevaluationbetweenglassandpolyethylenefiberreinforcedcompositesareviewofthecurrentliterature