Cargando…
Comparative evaluation between glass and polyethylene fiber reinforced composites: A review of the current literature
BACKGROUND: Fiber reinforced composite (FRC) is a promising class of material that gives clinicians alternative treatment options. There are many FRC products available in the market based on either glass or polyethylene fiber type. The aim of this study was to present a comparison between glass and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medicina Oral S.L.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5794118/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29410756 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.54205 |
_version_ | 1783297064473460736 |
---|---|
author | Mangoush, Enas Säilynoja, Eija Prinssi, Roosa Lassila, Lippo Vallittu, Pekka K. Garoushi, Sufyan |
author_facet | Mangoush, Enas Säilynoja, Eija Prinssi, Roosa Lassila, Lippo Vallittu, Pekka K. Garoushi, Sufyan |
author_sort | Mangoush, Enas |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Fiber reinforced composite (FRC) is a promising class of material that gives clinicians alternative treatment options. There are many FRC products available in the market based on either glass or polyethylene fiber type. The aim of this study was to present a comparison between glass and polyethylene fiber reinforced composites based on available literature review. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A thorough literature search, with no limitation, was done up to June 2017. The range of relevant publications was surveyed using PubMed and Google Scholar. From the search results, articles related to our search terms were only considered. An assessment of these articles was done by two individuals in order to include only articles directly compare between glass and polyethylene FRCs. The search terms used were “fiber reinforced dental composites” and “glass and polyethylene fibers in dentistry”. RESULTS: The search provided 276 titles. Full-text analysis was performed for 29 articles that met the inclusion criteria. Most were laboratory-based research with various test specimen designs prepared according to ISO standard or with extracted teeth and only three articles were clinical studies. Most of studies (n=23) found superior characteristics of glass FRCs over polyethylene FRCs. CONCLUSIONS: Significant reinforcement differences between commercial glass and polyethylene fiber reinforced composites were found. Key words:Fiber reinforced composite, glass fiber, polyethylene fiber. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5794118 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Medicina Oral S.L. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57941182018-02-06 Comparative evaluation between glass and polyethylene fiber reinforced composites: A review of the current literature Mangoush, Enas Säilynoja, Eija Prinssi, Roosa Lassila, Lippo Vallittu, Pekka K. Garoushi, Sufyan J Clin Exp Dent Research BACKGROUND: Fiber reinforced composite (FRC) is a promising class of material that gives clinicians alternative treatment options. There are many FRC products available in the market based on either glass or polyethylene fiber type. The aim of this study was to present a comparison between glass and polyethylene fiber reinforced composites based on available literature review. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A thorough literature search, with no limitation, was done up to June 2017. The range of relevant publications was surveyed using PubMed and Google Scholar. From the search results, articles related to our search terms were only considered. An assessment of these articles was done by two individuals in order to include only articles directly compare between glass and polyethylene FRCs. The search terms used were “fiber reinforced dental composites” and “glass and polyethylene fibers in dentistry”. RESULTS: The search provided 276 titles. Full-text analysis was performed for 29 articles that met the inclusion criteria. Most were laboratory-based research with various test specimen designs prepared according to ISO standard or with extracted teeth and only three articles were clinical studies. Most of studies (n=23) found superior characteristics of glass FRCs over polyethylene FRCs. CONCLUSIONS: Significant reinforcement differences between commercial glass and polyethylene fiber reinforced composites were found. Key words:Fiber reinforced composite, glass fiber, polyethylene fiber. Medicina Oral S.L. 2017-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5794118/ /pubmed/29410756 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.54205 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Mangoush, Enas Säilynoja, Eija Prinssi, Roosa Lassila, Lippo Vallittu, Pekka K. Garoushi, Sufyan Comparative evaluation between glass and polyethylene fiber reinforced composites: A review of the current literature |
title | Comparative evaluation between glass and polyethylene fiber reinforced composites: A review of the current literature |
title_full | Comparative evaluation between glass and polyethylene fiber reinforced composites: A review of the current literature |
title_fullStr | Comparative evaluation between glass and polyethylene fiber reinforced composites: A review of the current literature |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative evaluation between glass and polyethylene fiber reinforced composites: A review of the current literature |
title_short | Comparative evaluation between glass and polyethylene fiber reinforced composites: A review of the current literature |
title_sort | comparative evaluation between glass and polyethylene fiber reinforced composites: a review of the current literature |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5794118/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29410756 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.54205 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mangoushenas comparativeevaluationbetweenglassandpolyethylenefiberreinforcedcompositesareviewofthecurrentliterature AT sailynojaeija comparativeevaluationbetweenglassandpolyethylenefiberreinforcedcompositesareviewofthecurrentliterature AT prinssiroosa comparativeevaluationbetweenglassandpolyethylenefiberreinforcedcompositesareviewofthecurrentliterature AT lassilalippo comparativeevaluationbetweenglassandpolyethylenefiberreinforcedcompositesareviewofthecurrentliterature AT vallittupekkak comparativeevaluationbetweenglassandpolyethylenefiberreinforcedcompositesareviewofthecurrentliterature AT garoushisufyan comparativeevaluationbetweenglassandpolyethylenefiberreinforcedcompositesareviewofthecurrentliterature |