Cargando…
Angiography and Embolization in the Management of Bleeding Pelvic Fractures
The use, timing, and priority of angioembolization in the management of bleeding pelvic fractures remain ambiguous. The most common vessels for angioembolization are, in decreasing order, the internal iliac artery and its branches, the superior gluteal artery, the obturator artery, and the internal...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5794236/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29351135 http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-16-00600 |
_version_ | 1783297085455466496 |
---|---|
author | Vaidya, Rahul Waldron, Jacob Scott, Alesha Nasr, Kerellos |
author_facet | Vaidya, Rahul Waldron, Jacob Scott, Alesha Nasr, Kerellos |
author_sort | Vaidya, Rahul |
collection | PubMed |
description | The use, timing, and priority of angioembolization in the management of bleeding pelvic fractures remain ambiguous. The most common vessels for angioembolization are, in decreasing order, the internal iliac artery and its branches, the superior gluteal artery, the obturator artery, and the internal pudendal artery. Technical success rates for this treatment option range from 74% to 100%. The fracture patterns most commonly requiring angioembolization are the Young and Burgess lateral compression and anterior-posterior compression types and Tile type C. Mortality rates after angioembolization of 16% to 50% have been reported, but deaths are usually related to concomitant injuries. The sensitivity and specificity of contrast-enhanced CT in detecting the need for angioembolization range from 60% to 90% and 92% to 100%, respectively. Angioembolization can be effective in the management of bleeding pelvic fractures, but as with any treatment, the risks of complications must be considered. Availability of angioembolization and institutional expertise/preference for the alternative strategy of pelvic packing influence its use. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5794236 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57942362018-02-13 Angiography and Embolization in the Management of Bleeding Pelvic Fractures Vaidya, Rahul Waldron, Jacob Scott, Alesha Nasr, Kerellos J Am Acad Orthop Surg Review Article The use, timing, and priority of angioembolization in the management of bleeding pelvic fractures remain ambiguous. The most common vessels for angioembolization are, in decreasing order, the internal iliac artery and its branches, the superior gluteal artery, the obturator artery, and the internal pudendal artery. Technical success rates for this treatment option range from 74% to 100%. The fracture patterns most commonly requiring angioembolization are the Young and Burgess lateral compression and anterior-posterior compression types and Tile type C. Mortality rates after angioembolization of 16% to 50% have been reported, but deaths are usually related to concomitant injuries. The sensitivity and specificity of contrast-enhanced CT in detecting the need for angioembolization range from 60% to 90% and 92% to 100%, respectively. Angioembolization can be effective in the management of bleeding pelvic fractures, but as with any treatment, the risks of complications must be considered. Availability of angioembolization and institutional expertise/preference for the alternative strategy of pelvic packing influence its use. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2018-02-15 2018-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5794236/ /pubmed/29351135 http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-16-00600 Text en Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Vaidya, Rahul Waldron, Jacob Scott, Alesha Nasr, Kerellos Angiography and Embolization in the Management of Bleeding Pelvic Fractures |
title | Angiography and Embolization in the Management of Bleeding Pelvic Fractures |
title_full | Angiography and Embolization in the Management of Bleeding Pelvic Fractures |
title_fullStr | Angiography and Embolization in the Management of Bleeding Pelvic Fractures |
title_full_unstemmed | Angiography and Embolization in the Management of Bleeding Pelvic Fractures |
title_short | Angiography and Embolization in the Management of Bleeding Pelvic Fractures |
title_sort | angiography and embolization in the management of bleeding pelvic fractures |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5794236/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29351135 http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-16-00600 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vaidyarahul angiographyandembolizationinthemanagementofbleedingpelvicfractures AT waldronjacob angiographyandembolizationinthemanagementofbleedingpelvicfractures AT scottalesha angiographyandembolizationinthemanagementofbleedingpelvicfractures AT nasrkerellos angiographyandembolizationinthemanagementofbleedingpelvicfractures |