Cargando…

Comparison of surgical and conservative treatment of Rockwood type-III acromioclavicular dislocation: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on the effects of surgical versus conservative treatment on Rockwood type-III dislocation of the acromioclavicular joint in general orthopedic practice. The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the clinical outcomes of patients managed surgically and conse...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tang, Guolong, Zhang, Yu, Liu, Yuan, Qin, Xiaodong, Hu, Jun, Li, Xiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5794375/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29369191
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000009690
_version_ 1783297114253557760
author Tang, Guolong
Zhang, Yu
Liu, Yuan
Qin, Xiaodong
Hu, Jun
Li, Xiang
author_facet Tang, Guolong
Zhang, Yu
Liu, Yuan
Qin, Xiaodong
Hu, Jun
Li, Xiang
author_sort Tang, Guolong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on the effects of surgical versus conservative treatment on Rockwood type-III dislocation of the acromioclavicular joint in general orthopedic practice. The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the clinical outcomes of patients managed surgically and conservatively following type-III acromioclavicular (AC) dislocation. METHODS: The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE via Ovid SP, and PubMed databases were searched for randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Patient data were pooled using standard meta-analytic approaches. For continuous variables, the weighted mean difference was used. For dichotomous data, the odds ratio was calculated. RESULTS: The current analysis included 10 trials on this topic, and the results demonstrated that there were no significant differences between surgical and conservative treatment in terms of pain, weakness, tenderness, post-traumatic arthritis, restriction of strength, unsatisfactory function, and scores (Constant, UCLA, Imatani, SST, DASH, Larsen). Analyses of ossification of the coracoclavicular ligament (OR = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.01–2.61) and osteolysis of the lateral clavicle (OR = 2.87, 95% CI = 1.27–6.52) suggested better function with conservative treatment versus surgical treatment, but the latter was superior to conservative treatment with regard to loss of anatomic reduction. Only 1 study showed a higher acromioclavicular joint instability score for surgical management compared with conservative management (P < .00001). CONCLUSION: In the management of Rockwood type-III AC dislocation, conservative treatment is superior to surgical treatment. Nonoperative treatment results in a lower incidence of ossification of the coracoclavicular ligament and osteolysis of the lateral clavicle compared with operative treatment. However, there was no statistical difference between operative and nonoperative treatment in terms of clinical outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5794375
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57943752018-02-07 Comparison of surgical and conservative treatment of Rockwood type-III acromioclavicular dislocation: A meta-analysis Tang, Guolong Zhang, Yu Liu, Yuan Qin, Xiaodong Hu, Jun Li, Xiang Medicine (Baltimore) 7100 BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on the effects of surgical versus conservative treatment on Rockwood type-III dislocation of the acromioclavicular joint in general orthopedic practice. The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the clinical outcomes of patients managed surgically and conservatively following type-III acromioclavicular (AC) dislocation. METHODS: The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE via Ovid SP, and PubMed databases were searched for randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Patient data were pooled using standard meta-analytic approaches. For continuous variables, the weighted mean difference was used. For dichotomous data, the odds ratio was calculated. RESULTS: The current analysis included 10 trials on this topic, and the results demonstrated that there were no significant differences between surgical and conservative treatment in terms of pain, weakness, tenderness, post-traumatic arthritis, restriction of strength, unsatisfactory function, and scores (Constant, UCLA, Imatani, SST, DASH, Larsen). Analyses of ossification of the coracoclavicular ligament (OR = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.01–2.61) and osteolysis of the lateral clavicle (OR = 2.87, 95% CI = 1.27–6.52) suggested better function with conservative treatment versus surgical treatment, but the latter was superior to conservative treatment with regard to loss of anatomic reduction. Only 1 study showed a higher acromioclavicular joint instability score for surgical management compared with conservative management (P < .00001). CONCLUSION: In the management of Rockwood type-III AC dislocation, conservative treatment is superior to surgical treatment. Nonoperative treatment results in a lower incidence of ossification of the coracoclavicular ligament and osteolysis of the lateral clavicle compared with operative treatment. However, there was no statistical difference between operative and nonoperative treatment in terms of clinical outcomes. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5794375/ /pubmed/29369191 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000009690 Text en Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle 7100
Tang, Guolong
Zhang, Yu
Liu, Yuan
Qin, Xiaodong
Hu, Jun
Li, Xiang
Comparison of surgical and conservative treatment of Rockwood type-III acromioclavicular dislocation: A meta-analysis
title Comparison of surgical and conservative treatment of Rockwood type-III acromioclavicular dislocation: A meta-analysis
title_full Comparison of surgical and conservative treatment of Rockwood type-III acromioclavicular dislocation: A meta-analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of surgical and conservative treatment of Rockwood type-III acromioclavicular dislocation: A meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of surgical and conservative treatment of Rockwood type-III acromioclavicular dislocation: A meta-analysis
title_short Comparison of surgical and conservative treatment of Rockwood type-III acromioclavicular dislocation: A meta-analysis
title_sort comparison of surgical and conservative treatment of rockwood type-iii acromioclavicular dislocation: a meta-analysis
topic 7100
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5794375/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29369191
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000009690
work_keys_str_mv AT tangguolong comparisonofsurgicalandconservativetreatmentofrockwoodtypeiiiacromioclaviculardislocationametaanalysis
AT zhangyu comparisonofsurgicalandconservativetreatmentofrockwoodtypeiiiacromioclaviculardislocationametaanalysis
AT liuyuan comparisonofsurgicalandconservativetreatmentofrockwoodtypeiiiacromioclaviculardislocationametaanalysis
AT qinxiaodong comparisonofsurgicalandconservativetreatmentofrockwoodtypeiiiacromioclaviculardislocationametaanalysis
AT hujun comparisonofsurgicalandconservativetreatmentofrockwoodtypeiiiacromioclaviculardislocationametaanalysis
AT lixiang comparisonofsurgicalandconservativetreatmentofrockwoodtypeiiiacromioclaviculardislocationametaanalysis