Cargando…

Intramedullary fixation versus plate fixation for displaced mid-shaft clavicle fractures: A systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses

BACKGROUND: Displaced mid-shaft clavicle fractures (DMCFs) are common injuries. Both intramedullary fixation (IMF) and plate fixation (PF) have been described and routinely used. Multiple trials have been conducted to compare these treatments. Multiple meta-analyses have been published to compare IM...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xie, Lin, Zhao, Zhigang, Zhang, Shujun, Hu, Yabin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5794407/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29369223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000009752
_version_ 1783297121685864448
author Xie, Lin
Zhao, Zhigang
Zhang, Shujun
Hu, Yabin
author_facet Xie, Lin
Zhao, Zhigang
Zhang, Shujun
Hu, Yabin
author_sort Xie, Lin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Displaced mid-shaft clavicle fractures (DMCFs) are common injuries. Both intramedullary fixation (IMF) and plate fixation (PF) have been described and routinely used. Multiple trials have been conducted to compare these treatments. Multiple meta-analyses have been published to compare IMF and PF treatment for DMCFs; however, the results remain controversial. The purposes of this study were to perform a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses comparing IMF and PF treatment for DMCFs, to help decision makers critically evaluate the current meta-analyses, and to propose a guide through the best available evidence. METHOD: We searched the Cochrane library, PubMed, and EMBASE data bases. Two authors independently scanned titles and abstracts to exclude irrelevant articles and identify meta-analyses that met the eligibility criteria. The methodological quality of the meta-analysis was independently assessed by the 2 authors using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine Levels of Evidence and the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) tool. Heterogeneity information of each variable was extracted from the included studies. An I(2) of <60% is accepted in this systematic review. The Jadad algorithm was then applied to determine which of the meta-analyses provided the best evidence. RESULTS: Eight meta-analysis met the inclusion criteria in this study. AMSTAR scores varied from 7 to 9. Heterogeneity of each outcome was acceptable. Four authors independently selected the same meta-analysis as providing the highest quality of evidence using the Jadad decision algorithm. CONCLUSION: This systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses suggests that compared with PF, major reintervention and refracture after implant removal occurred more frequently after PF of DMCFs. No differences in terms of function and non-union between PF and IMF were observed. Future research should focus on fracture selection for IMF and further improvement of plates and IM devices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5794407
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57944072018-02-07 Intramedullary fixation versus plate fixation for displaced mid-shaft clavicle fractures: A systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses Xie, Lin Zhao, Zhigang Zhang, Shujun Hu, Yabin Medicine (Baltimore) 7100 BACKGROUND: Displaced mid-shaft clavicle fractures (DMCFs) are common injuries. Both intramedullary fixation (IMF) and plate fixation (PF) have been described and routinely used. Multiple trials have been conducted to compare these treatments. Multiple meta-analyses have been published to compare IMF and PF treatment for DMCFs; however, the results remain controversial. The purposes of this study were to perform a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses comparing IMF and PF treatment for DMCFs, to help decision makers critically evaluate the current meta-analyses, and to propose a guide through the best available evidence. METHOD: We searched the Cochrane library, PubMed, and EMBASE data bases. Two authors independently scanned titles and abstracts to exclude irrelevant articles and identify meta-analyses that met the eligibility criteria. The methodological quality of the meta-analysis was independently assessed by the 2 authors using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine Levels of Evidence and the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) tool. Heterogeneity information of each variable was extracted from the included studies. An I(2) of <60% is accepted in this systematic review. The Jadad algorithm was then applied to determine which of the meta-analyses provided the best evidence. RESULTS: Eight meta-analysis met the inclusion criteria in this study. AMSTAR scores varied from 7 to 9. Heterogeneity of each outcome was acceptable. Four authors independently selected the same meta-analysis as providing the highest quality of evidence using the Jadad decision algorithm. CONCLUSION: This systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses suggests that compared with PF, major reintervention and refracture after implant removal occurred more frequently after PF of DMCFs. No differences in terms of function and non-union between PF and IMF were observed. Future research should focus on fracture selection for IMF and further improvement of plates and IM devices. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5794407/ /pubmed/29369223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000009752 Text en Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle 7100
Xie, Lin
Zhao, Zhigang
Zhang, Shujun
Hu, Yabin
Intramedullary fixation versus plate fixation for displaced mid-shaft clavicle fractures: A systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses
title Intramedullary fixation versus plate fixation for displaced mid-shaft clavicle fractures: A systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses
title_full Intramedullary fixation versus plate fixation for displaced mid-shaft clavicle fractures: A systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses
title_fullStr Intramedullary fixation versus plate fixation for displaced mid-shaft clavicle fractures: A systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses
title_full_unstemmed Intramedullary fixation versus plate fixation for displaced mid-shaft clavicle fractures: A systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses
title_short Intramedullary fixation versus plate fixation for displaced mid-shaft clavicle fractures: A systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses
title_sort intramedullary fixation versus plate fixation for displaced mid-shaft clavicle fractures: a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses
topic 7100
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5794407/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29369223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000009752
work_keys_str_mv AT xielin intramedullaryfixationversusplatefixationfordisplacedmidshaftclaviclefracturesasystematicreviewofoverlappingmetaanalyses
AT zhaozhigang intramedullaryfixationversusplatefixationfordisplacedmidshaftclaviclefracturesasystematicreviewofoverlappingmetaanalyses
AT zhangshujun intramedullaryfixationversusplatefixationfordisplacedmidshaftclaviclefracturesasystematicreviewofoverlappingmetaanalyses
AT huyabin intramedullaryfixationversusplatefixationfordisplacedmidshaftclaviclefracturesasystematicreviewofoverlappingmetaanalyses