Cargando…
Complex biliary stones management: cholangioscopy versus papillary large balloon dilation – a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Endoscopic removal of biliary stones has high success rates, ranging between 85 % to 95 %. Nevertheless, some stones may be challenging and different endoscopic methods have evolved. Papillary large balloon dilation after sphincterotomy is a widely used technique with suc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2018
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5794432/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29399609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-122493 |
_version_ | 1783297123538698240 |
---|---|
author | Franzini, Tomazo Moura, Renata Nobre Bonifácio, Priscilla Luz, Gustavo Oliveira de Souza, Thiago Ferreira dos Santos, Marcos Eduardo Lera Rodela, Gustavo Luis Ide, Edson Herman, Paulo Montagnini, André Luis D’Albuquerque, Luiz Augusto Carneiro Sakai, Paulo de Moura, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux |
author_facet | Franzini, Tomazo Moura, Renata Nobre Bonifácio, Priscilla Luz, Gustavo Oliveira de Souza, Thiago Ferreira dos Santos, Marcos Eduardo Lera Rodela, Gustavo Luis Ide, Edson Herman, Paulo Montagnini, André Luis D’Albuquerque, Luiz Augusto Carneiro Sakai, Paulo de Moura, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux |
author_sort | Franzini, Tomazo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Endoscopic removal of biliary stones has high success rates, ranging between 85 % to 95 %. Nevertheless, some stones may be challenging and different endoscopic methods have evolved. Papillary large balloon dilation after sphincterotomy is a widely used technique with success rates ranging from 68 to 90 % for stones larger than 15 mm. Cholangioscopy allows performing lithotripsy under direct biliary visualization, either by laser or electrohydraulic waves, which have similar success rate (80 % – 90 %). However, there is no study comparing these 2 techniques. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From April 2014 to June 2016, 100 patients were enrolled and randomized in 2 groups, using a non-inferiority hypothesis: cholangioscopy + electrohydraulic lithotripsy (group 1) and endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (group 2). The main outcome was complete stone removal. Adverse events were documented. Mechanical lithotripsy was not performed. Failure cases had a second session with crossover of the methods. RESULTS: The mean age was 56 years. 74 (75.5 %) patients were female. The initial overall complete stone removal rate was 74.5 % (77.1 % in group 1 and 72 % in group 2, P > 0.05). After second session the overall success rate achieved 90.1 %. Procedure time was significantly lower in group 2, – 25.2 min (CI95 % – 12.48 to – 37.91). There were no significant differences regarding technical success rate, radiologic exposure and adverse events. CONCLUSION: Single-operator cholangioscopy-guided lithotripsy and papillary large balloon dilation are effective and safe approaches for removing complex biliary stones. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5794432 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | © Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57944322018-02-02 Complex biliary stones management: cholangioscopy versus papillary large balloon dilation – a randomized controlled trial Franzini, Tomazo Moura, Renata Nobre Bonifácio, Priscilla Luz, Gustavo Oliveira de Souza, Thiago Ferreira dos Santos, Marcos Eduardo Lera Rodela, Gustavo Luis Ide, Edson Herman, Paulo Montagnini, André Luis D’Albuquerque, Luiz Augusto Carneiro Sakai, Paulo de Moura, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux Endosc Int Open BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Endoscopic removal of biliary stones has high success rates, ranging between 85 % to 95 %. Nevertheless, some stones may be challenging and different endoscopic methods have evolved. Papillary large balloon dilation after sphincterotomy is a widely used technique with success rates ranging from 68 to 90 % for stones larger than 15 mm. Cholangioscopy allows performing lithotripsy under direct biliary visualization, either by laser or electrohydraulic waves, which have similar success rate (80 % – 90 %). However, there is no study comparing these 2 techniques. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From April 2014 to June 2016, 100 patients were enrolled and randomized in 2 groups, using a non-inferiority hypothesis: cholangioscopy + electrohydraulic lithotripsy (group 1) and endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (group 2). The main outcome was complete stone removal. Adverse events were documented. Mechanical lithotripsy was not performed. Failure cases had a second session with crossover of the methods. RESULTS: The mean age was 56 years. 74 (75.5 %) patients were female. The initial overall complete stone removal rate was 74.5 % (77.1 % in group 1 and 72 % in group 2, P > 0.05). After second session the overall success rate achieved 90.1 %. Procedure time was significantly lower in group 2, – 25.2 min (CI95 % – 12.48 to – 37.91). There were no significant differences regarding technical success rate, radiologic exposure and adverse events. CONCLUSION: Single-operator cholangioscopy-guided lithotripsy and papillary large balloon dilation are effective and safe approaches for removing complex biliary stones. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2018-02 2018-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5794432/ /pubmed/29399609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-122493 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Franzini, Tomazo Moura, Renata Nobre Bonifácio, Priscilla Luz, Gustavo Oliveira de Souza, Thiago Ferreira dos Santos, Marcos Eduardo Lera Rodela, Gustavo Luis Ide, Edson Herman, Paulo Montagnini, André Luis D’Albuquerque, Luiz Augusto Carneiro Sakai, Paulo de Moura, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux Complex biliary stones management: cholangioscopy versus papillary large balloon dilation – a randomized controlled trial |
title | Complex biliary stones management: cholangioscopy versus papillary large balloon dilation – a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Complex biliary stones management: cholangioscopy versus papillary large balloon dilation – a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Complex biliary stones management: cholangioscopy versus papillary large balloon dilation – a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Complex biliary stones management: cholangioscopy versus papillary large balloon dilation – a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Complex biliary stones management: cholangioscopy versus papillary large balloon dilation – a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | complex biliary stones management: cholangioscopy versus papillary large balloon dilation – a randomized controlled trial |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5794432/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29399609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-122493 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT franzinitomazo complexbiliarystonesmanagementcholangioscopyversuspapillarylargeballoondilationarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mourarenatanobre complexbiliarystonesmanagementcholangioscopyversuspapillarylargeballoondilationarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT bonifaciopriscilla complexbiliarystonesmanagementcholangioscopyversuspapillarylargeballoondilationarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT luzgustavooliveira complexbiliarystonesmanagementcholangioscopyversuspapillarylargeballoondilationarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT desouzathiagoferreira complexbiliarystonesmanagementcholangioscopyversuspapillarylargeballoondilationarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT dossantosmarcoseduardolera complexbiliarystonesmanagementcholangioscopyversuspapillarylargeballoondilationarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT rodelagustavoluis complexbiliarystonesmanagementcholangioscopyversuspapillarylargeballoondilationarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT ideedson complexbiliarystonesmanagementcholangioscopyversuspapillarylargeballoondilationarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hermanpaulo complexbiliarystonesmanagementcholangioscopyversuspapillarylargeballoondilationarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT montagniniandreluis complexbiliarystonesmanagementcholangioscopyversuspapillarylargeballoondilationarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT dalbuquerqueluizaugustocarneiro complexbiliarystonesmanagementcholangioscopyversuspapillarylargeballoondilationarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT sakaipaulo complexbiliarystonesmanagementcholangioscopyversuspapillarylargeballoondilationarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT demouraeduardoguimaraeshourneaux complexbiliarystonesmanagementcholangioscopyversuspapillarylargeballoondilationarandomizedcontrolledtrial |