Cargando…

Complex biliary stones management: cholangioscopy versus papillary large balloon dilation – a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS:  Endoscopic removal of biliary stones has high success rates, ranging between 85 % to 95 %. Nevertheless, some stones may be challenging and different endoscopic methods have evolved. Papillary large balloon dilation after sphincterotomy is a widely used technique with suc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Franzini, Tomazo, Moura, Renata Nobre, Bonifácio, Priscilla, Luz, Gustavo Oliveira, de Souza, Thiago Ferreira, dos Santos, Marcos Eduardo Lera, Rodela, Gustavo Luis, Ide, Edson, Herman, Paulo, Montagnini, André Luis, D’Albuquerque, Luiz Augusto Carneiro, Sakai, Paulo, de Moura, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2018
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5794432/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29399609
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-122493
_version_ 1783297123538698240
author Franzini, Tomazo
Moura, Renata Nobre
Bonifácio, Priscilla
Luz, Gustavo Oliveira
de Souza, Thiago Ferreira
dos Santos, Marcos Eduardo Lera
Rodela, Gustavo Luis
Ide, Edson
Herman, Paulo
Montagnini, André Luis
D’Albuquerque, Luiz Augusto Carneiro
Sakai, Paulo
de Moura, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux
author_facet Franzini, Tomazo
Moura, Renata Nobre
Bonifácio, Priscilla
Luz, Gustavo Oliveira
de Souza, Thiago Ferreira
dos Santos, Marcos Eduardo Lera
Rodela, Gustavo Luis
Ide, Edson
Herman, Paulo
Montagnini, André Luis
D’Albuquerque, Luiz Augusto Carneiro
Sakai, Paulo
de Moura, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux
author_sort Franzini, Tomazo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS:  Endoscopic removal of biliary stones has high success rates, ranging between 85 % to 95 %. Nevertheless, some stones may be challenging and different endoscopic methods have evolved. Papillary large balloon dilation after sphincterotomy is a widely used technique with success rates ranging from 68 to 90 % for stones larger than 15 mm. Cholangioscopy allows performing lithotripsy under direct biliary visualization, either by laser or electrohydraulic waves, which have similar success rate (80 % – 90 %). However, there is no study comparing these 2 techniques. PATIENTS AND METHODS:  From April 2014 to June 2016, 100 patients were enrolled and randomized in 2 groups, using a non-inferiority hypothesis: cholangioscopy + electrohydraulic lithotripsy (group 1) and endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (group 2). The main outcome was complete stone removal. Adverse events were documented. Mechanical lithotripsy was not performed. Failure cases had a second session with crossover of the methods. RESULTS:  The mean age was 56 years. 74 (75.5 %) patients were female. The initial overall complete stone removal rate was 74.5 % (77.1 % in group 1 and 72 % in group 2, P  > 0.05). After second session the overall success rate achieved 90.1 %. Procedure time was significantly lower in group 2, – 25.2 min (CI95 % – 12.48 to – 37.91). There were no significant differences regarding technical success rate, radiologic exposure and adverse events. CONCLUSION:  Single-operator cholangioscopy-guided lithotripsy and papillary large balloon dilation are effective and safe approaches for removing complex biliary stones.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5794432
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher © Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57944322018-02-02 Complex biliary stones management: cholangioscopy versus papillary large balloon dilation – a randomized controlled trial Franzini, Tomazo Moura, Renata Nobre Bonifácio, Priscilla Luz, Gustavo Oliveira de Souza, Thiago Ferreira dos Santos, Marcos Eduardo Lera Rodela, Gustavo Luis Ide, Edson Herman, Paulo Montagnini, André Luis D’Albuquerque, Luiz Augusto Carneiro Sakai, Paulo de Moura, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux Endosc Int Open BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS:  Endoscopic removal of biliary stones has high success rates, ranging between 85 % to 95 %. Nevertheless, some stones may be challenging and different endoscopic methods have evolved. Papillary large balloon dilation after sphincterotomy is a widely used technique with success rates ranging from 68 to 90 % for stones larger than 15 mm. Cholangioscopy allows performing lithotripsy under direct biliary visualization, either by laser or electrohydraulic waves, which have similar success rate (80 % – 90 %). However, there is no study comparing these 2 techniques. PATIENTS AND METHODS:  From April 2014 to June 2016, 100 patients were enrolled and randomized in 2 groups, using a non-inferiority hypothesis: cholangioscopy + electrohydraulic lithotripsy (group 1) and endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (group 2). The main outcome was complete stone removal. Adverse events were documented. Mechanical lithotripsy was not performed. Failure cases had a second session with crossover of the methods. RESULTS:  The mean age was 56 years. 74 (75.5 %) patients were female. The initial overall complete stone removal rate was 74.5 % (77.1 % in group 1 and 72 % in group 2, P  > 0.05). After second session the overall success rate achieved 90.1 %. Procedure time was significantly lower in group 2, – 25.2 min (CI95 % – 12.48 to – 37.91). There were no significant differences regarding technical success rate, radiologic exposure and adverse events. CONCLUSION:  Single-operator cholangioscopy-guided lithotripsy and papillary large balloon dilation are effective and safe approaches for removing complex biliary stones. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2018-02 2018-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5794432/ /pubmed/29399609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-122493 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Franzini, Tomazo
Moura, Renata Nobre
Bonifácio, Priscilla
Luz, Gustavo Oliveira
de Souza, Thiago Ferreira
dos Santos, Marcos Eduardo Lera
Rodela, Gustavo Luis
Ide, Edson
Herman, Paulo
Montagnini, André Luis
D’Albuquerque, Luiz Augusto Carneiro
Sakai, Paulo
de Moura, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux
Complex biliary stones management: cholangioscopy versus papillary large balloon dilation – a randomized controlled trial
title Complex biliary stones management: cholangioscopy versus papillary large balloon dilation – a randomized controlled trial
title_full Complex biliary stones management: cholangioscopy versus papillary large balloon dilation – a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Complex biliary stones management: cholangioscopy versus papillary large balloon dilation – a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Complex biliary stones management: cholangioscopy versus papillary large balloon dilation – a randomized controlled trial
title_short Complex biliary stones management: cholangioscopy versus papillary large balloon dilation – a randomized controlled trial
title_sort complex biliary stones management: cholangioscopy versus papillary large balloon dilation – a randomized controlled trial
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5794432/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29399609
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-122493
work_keys_str_mv AT franzinitomazo complexbiliarystonesmanagementcholangioscopyversuspapillarylargeballoondilationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mourarenatanobre complexbiliarystonesmanagementcholangioscopyversuspapillarylargeballoondilationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bonifaciopriscilla complexbiliarystonesmanagementcholangioscopyversuspapillarylargeballoondilationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT luzgustavooliveira complexbiliarystonesmanagementcholangioscopyversuspapillarylargeballoondilationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT desouzathiagoferreira complexbiliarystonesmanagementcholangioscopyversuspapillarylargeballoondilationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT dossantosmarcoseduardolera complexbiliarystonesmanagementcholangioscopyversuspapillarylargeballoondilationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rodelagustavoluis complexbiliarystonesmanagementcholangioscopyversuspapillarylargeballoondilationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ideedson complexbiliarystonesmanagementcholangioscopyversuspapillarylargeballoondilationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hermanpaulo complexbiliarystonesmanagementcholangioscopyversuspapillarylargeballoondilationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT montagniniandreluis complexbiliarystonesmanagementcholangioscopyversuspapillarylargeballoondilationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT dalbuquerqueluizaugustocarneiro complexbiliarystonesmanagementcholangioscopyversuspapillarylargeballoondilationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sakaipaulo complexbiliarystonesmanagementcholangioscopyversuspapillarylargeballoondilationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT demouraeduardoguimaraeshourneaux complexbiliarystonesmanagementcholangioscopyversuspapillarylargeballoondilationarandomizedcontrolledtrial