Cargando…

Clinical and Demographic Profile of Patients Receiving Fingolimod in Clinical Practice in Germany and the Benefit–Risk Profile of Fingolimod After 1 Year of Treatment: Initial Results From the Observational, Noninterventional Study PANGAEA

The population with multiple sclerosis receiving treatment in clinical practice differs from that in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). An assessment of the real-world benefit–risk profile of therapies is needed. This analysis used data from the large, noninterventional, observational German study...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ziemssen, Tjalf, Lang, Michael, Tackenberg, Björn, Schmidt, Stephan, Albrecht, Holger, Klotz, Luisa, Haas, Judith, Lassek, Christoph, Medin, Jennie, Cornelissen, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5794706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29274026
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13311-017-0595-y
_version_ 1783297151268290560
author Ziemssen, Tjalf
Lang, Michael
Tackenberg, Björn
Schmidt, Stephan
Albrecht, Holger
Klotz, Luisa
Haas, Judith
Lassek, Christoph
Medin, Jennie
Cornelissen, Christian
author_facet Ziemssen, Tjalf
Lang, Michael
Tackenberg, Björn
Schmidt, Stephan
Albrecht, Holger
Klotz, Luisa
Haas, Judith
Lassek, Christoph
Medin, Jennie
Cornelissen, Christian
author_sort Ziemssen, Tjalf
collection PubMed
description The population with multiple sclerosis receiving treatment in clinical practice differs from that in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). An assessment of the real-world benefit–risk profile of therapies is needed. This analysis used data from the large, noninterventional, observational German study Post-Authorization Non-interventional German sAfety study of GilEnyA (PANGAEA) to assess prospectively baseline characteristics and outcomes after 12 months (± 90 days) of fingolimod treatment. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts: fingolimod starter [first received fingolimod in PANGAEA (n = 3315)] and previous study [received fingolimod before enrollment in PANGAEA in RCTs (n = 875), some of whom also had baseline data at entry into RCTs (n = 505)]. At PANGAEA baseline, patients in the fingolimod starter versus the previous study cohort had a higher annualized relapse rate [ARR (95% confidence interval): 1.79 (1.75–1.83) vs 1.32 (1.25–1.40)] and Expanded Disability Status Scale score [3.11 (3.04–3.17) vs 2.55 (2.44–2.66)]. A greater proportion in the fingolimod starter versus previous study cohort had diabetes (2.0% vs 0.7%). After 12 months of fingolimod, ARRs were lower than in the 12 months before PANGAEA enrollment in the fingolimod starter [0.386 (0.360–0.414)] and previous study [0.276 (0.238–0.320)] cohorts. Expanded Disability Status Scale scores were stable versus baseline. Adverse events were experienced by similar proportions in both cohorts during fingolimod treatment. Relevant differences exist in disease activity and comorbidities between patients receiving fingolimod in clinical practice versus RCTs. Irrespective of baseline differences indicating a higher proportion at an advanced stage of multiple sclerosis in the real world versus RCTs, fingolimod remains effective, with a manageable safety profile. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s13311-017-0595-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5794706
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57947062018-02-05 Clinical and Demographic Profile of Patients Receiving Fingolimod in Clinical Practice in Germany and the Benefit–Risk Profile of Fingolimod After 1 Year of Treatment: Initial Results From the Observational, Noninterventional Study PANGAEA Ziemssen, Tjalf Lang, Michael Tackenberg, Björn Schmidt, Stephan Albrecht, Holger Klotz, Luisa Haas, Judith Lassek, Christoph Medin, Jennie Cornelissen, Christian Neurotherapeutics Original Article The population with multiple sclerosis receiving treatment in clinical practice differs from that in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). An assessment of the real-world benefit–risk profile of therapies is needed. This analysis used data from the large, noninterventional, observational German study Post-Authorization Non-interventional German sAfety study of GilEnyA (PANGAEA) to assess prospectively baseline characteristics and outcomes after 12 months (± 90 days) of fingolimod treatment. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts: fingolimod starter [first received fingolimod in PANGAEA (n = 3315)] and previous study [received fingolimod before enrollment in PANGAEA in RCTs (n = 875), some of whom also had baseline data at entry into RCTs (n = 505)]. At PANGAEA baseline, patients in the fingolimod starter versus the previous study cohort had a higher annualized relapse rate [ARR (95% confidence interval): 1.79 (1.75–1.83) vs 1.32 (1.25–1.40)] and Expanded Disability Status Scale score [3.11 (3.04–3.17) vs 2.55 (2.44–2.66)]. A greater proportion in the fingolimod starter versus previous study cohort had diabetes (2.0% vs 0.7%). After 12 months of fingolimod, ARRs were lower than in the 12 months before PANGAEA enrollment in the fingolimod starter [0.386 (0.360–0.414)] and previous study [0.276 (0.238–0.320)] cohorts. Expanded Disability Status Scale scores were stable versus baseline. Adverse events were experienced by similar proportions in both cohorts during fingolimod treatment. Relevant differences exist in disease activity and comorbidities between patients receiving fingolimod in clinical practice versus RCTs. Irrespective of baseline differences indicating a higher proportion at an advanced stage of multiple sclerosis in the real world versus RCTs, fingolimod remains effective, with a manageable safety profile. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s13311-017-0595-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2017-12-22 2018-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5794706/ /pubmed/29274026 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13311-017-0595-y Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ziemssen, Tjalf
Lang, Michael
Tackenberg, Björn
Schmidt, Stephan
Albrecht, Holger
Klotz, Luisa
Haas, Judith
Lassek, Christoph
Medin, Jennie
Cornelissen, Christian
Clinical and Demographic Profile of Patients Receiving Fingolimod in Clinical Practice in Germany and the Benefit–Risk Profile of Fingolimod After 1 Year of Treatment: Initial Results From the Observational, Noninterventional Study PANGAEA
title Clinical and Demographic Profile of Patients Receiving Fingolimod in Clinical Practice in Germany and the Benefit–Risk Profile of Fingolimod After 1 Year of Treatment: Initial Results From the Observational, Noninterventional Study PANGAEA
title_full Clinical and Demographic Profile of Patients Receiving Fingolimod in Clinical Practice in Germany and the Benefit–Risk Profile of Fingolimod After 1 Year of Treatment: Initial Results From the Observational, Noninterventional Study PANGAEA
title_fullStr Clinical and Demographic Profile of Patients Receiving Fingolimod in Clinical Practice in Germany and the Benefit–Risk Profile of Fingolimod After 1 Year of Treatment: Initial Results From the Observational, Noninterventional Study PANGAEA
title_full_unstemmed Clinical and Demographic Profile of Patients Receiving Fingolimod in Clinical Practice in Germany and the Benefit–Risk Profile of Fingolimod After 1 Year of Treatment: Initial Results From the Observational, Noninterventional Study PANGAEA
title_short Clinical and Demographic Profile of Patients Receiving Fingolimod in Clinical Practice in Germany and the Benefit–Risk Profile of Fingolimod After 1 Year of Treatment: Initial Results From the Observational, Noninterventional Study PANGAEA
title_sort clinical and demographic profile of patients receiving fingolimod in clinical practice in germany and the benefit–risk profile of fingolimod after 1 year of treatment: initial results from the observational, noninterventional study pangaea
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5794706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29274026
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13311-017-0595-y
work_keys_str_mv AT ziemssentjalf clinicalanddemographicprofileofpatientsreceivingfingolimodinclinicalpracticeingermanyandthebenefitriskprofileoffingolimodafter1yearoftreatmentinitialresultsfromtheobservationalnoninterventionalstudypangaea
AT langmichael clinicalanddemographicprofileofpatientsreceivingfingolimodinclinicalpracticeingermanyandthebenefitriskprofileoffingolimodafter1yearoftreatmentinitialresultsfromtheobservationalnoninterventionalstudypangaea
AT tackenbergbjorn clinicalanddemographicprofileofpatientsreceivingfingolimodinclinicalpracticeingermanyandthebenefitriskprofileoffingolimodafter1yearoftreatmentinitialresultsfromtheobservationalnoninterventionalstudypangaea
AT schmidtstephan clinicalanddemographicprofileofpatientsreceivingfingolimodinclinicalpracticeingermanyandthebenefitriskprofileoffingolimodafter1yearoftreatmentinitialresultsfromtheobservationalnoninterventionalstudypangaea
AT albrechtholger clinicalanddemographicprofileofpatientsreceivingfingolimodinclinicalpracticeingermanyandthebenefitriskprofileoffingolimodafter1yearoftreatmentinitialresultsfromtheobservationalnoninterventionalstudypangaea
AT klotzluisa clinicalanddemographicprofileofpatientsreceivingfingolimodinclinicalpracticeingermanyandthebenefitriskprofileoffingolimodafter1yearoftreatmentinitialresultsfromtheobservationalnoninterventionalstudypangaea
AT haasjudith clinicalanddemographicprofileofpatientsreceivingfingolimodinclinicalpracticeingermanyandthebenefitriskprofileoffingolimodafter1yearoftreatmentinitialresultsfromtheobservationalnoninterventionalstudypangaea
AT lassekchristoph clinicalanddemographicprofileofpatientsreceivingfingolimodinclinicalpracticeingermanyandthebenefitriskprofileoffingolimodafter1yearoftreatmentinitialresultsfromtheobservationalnoninterventionalstudypangaea
AT medinjennie clinicalanddemographicprofileofpatientsreceivingfingolimodinclinicalpracticeingermanyandthebenefitriskprofileoffingolimodafter1yearoftreatmentinitialresultsfromtheobservationalnoninterventionalstudypangaea
AT cornelissenchristian clinicalanddemographicprofileofpatientsreceivingfingolimodinclinicalpracticeingermanyandthebenefitriskprofileoffingolimodafter1yearoftreatmentinitialresultsfromtheobservationalnoninterventionalstudypangaea
AT clinicalanddemographicprofileofpatientsreceivingfingolimodinclinicalpracticeingermanyandthebenefitriskprofileoffingolimodafter1yearoftreatmentinitialresultsfromtheobservationalnoninterventionalstudypangaea