Cargando…
Clinical and Demographic Profile of Patients Receiving Fingolimod in Clinical Practice in Germany and the Benefit–Risk Profile of Fingolimod After 1 Year of Treatment: Initial Results From the Observational, Noninterventional Study PANGAEA
The population with multiple sclerosis receiving treatment in clinical practice differs from that in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). An assessment of the real-world benefit–risk profile of therapies is needed. This analysis used data from the large, noninterventional, observational German study...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5794706/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29274026 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13311-017-0595-y |
_version_ | 1783297151268290560 |
---|---|
author | Ziemssen, Tjalf Lang, Michael Tackenberg, Björn Schmidt, Stephan Albrecht, Holger Klotz, Luisa Haas, Judith Lassek, Christoph Medin, Jennie Cornelissen, Christian |
author_facet | Ziemssen, Tjalf Lang, Michael Tackenberg, Björn Schmidt, Stephan Albrecht, Holger Klotz, Luisa Haas, Judith Lassek, Christoph Medin, Jennie Cornelissen, Christian |
author_sort | Ziemssen, Tjalf |
collection | PubMed |
description | The population with multiple sclerosis receiving treatment in clinical practice differs from that in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). An assessment of the real-world benefit–risk profile of therapies is needed. This analysis used data from the large, noninterventional, observational German study Post-Authorization Non-interventional German sAfety study of GilEnyA (PANGAEA) to assess prospectively baseline characteristics and outcomes after 12 months (± 90 days) of fingolimod treatment. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts: fingolimod starter [first received fingolimod in PANGAEA (n = 3315)] and previous study [received fingolimod before enrollment in PANGAEA in RCTs (n = 875), some of whom also had baseline data at entry into RCTs (n = 505)]. At PANGAEA baseline, patients in the fingolimod starter versus the previous study cohort had a higher annualized relapse rate [ARR (95% confidence interval): 1.79 (1.75–1.83) vs 1.32 (1.25–1.40)] and Expanded Disability Status Scale score [3.11 (3.04–3.17) vs 2.55 (2.44–2.66)]. A greater proportion in the fingolimod starter versus previous study cohort had diabetes (2.0% vs 0.7%). After 12 months of fingolimod, ARRs were lower than in the 12 months before PANGAEA enrollment in the fingolimod starter [0.386 (0.360–0.414)] and previous study [0.276 (0.238–0.320)] cohorts. Expanded Disability Status Scale scores were stable versus baseline. Adverse events were experienced by similar proportions in both cohorts during fingolimod treatment. Relevant differences exist in disease activity and comorbidities between patients receiving fingolimod in clinical practice versus RCTs. Irrespective of baseline differences indicating a higher proportion at an advanced stage of multiple sclerosis in the real world versus RCTs, fingolimod remains effective, with a manageable safety profile. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s13311-017-0595-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5794706 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57947062018-02-05 Clinical and Demographic Profile of Patients Receiving Fingolimod in Clinical Practice in Germany and the Benefit–Risk Profile of Fingolimod After 1 Year of Treatment: Initial Results From the Observational, Noninterventional Study PANGAEA Ziemssen, Tjalf Lang, Michael Tackenberg, Björn Schmidt, Stephan Albrecht, Holger Klotz, Luisa Haas, Judith Lassek, Christoph Medin, Jennie Cornelissen, Christian Neurotherapeutics Original Article The population with multiple sclerosis receiving treatment in clinical practice differs from that in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). An assessment of the real-world benefit–risk profile of therapies is needed. This analysis used data from the large, noninterventional, observational German study Post-Authorization Non-interventional German sAfety study of GilEnyA (PANGAEA) to assess prospectively baseline characteristics and outcomes after 12 months (± 90 days) of fingolimod treatment. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts: fingolimod starter [first received fingolimod in PANGAEA (n = 3315)] and previous study [received fingolimod before enrollment in PANGAEA in RCTs (n = 875), some of whom also had baseline data at entry into RCTs (n = 505)]. At PANGAEA baseline, patients in the fingolimod starter versus the previous study cohort had a higher annualized relapse rate [ARR (95% confidence interval): 1.79 (1.75–1.83) vs 1.32 (1.25–1.40)] and Expanded Disability Status Scale score [3.11 (3.04–3.17) vs 2.55 (2.44–2.66)]. A greater proportion in the fingolimod starter versus previous study cohort had diabetes (2.0% vs 0.7%). After 12 months of fingolimod, ARRs were lower than in the 12 months before PANGAEA enrollment in the fingolimod starter [0.386 (0.360–0.414)] and previous study [0.276 (0.238–0.320)] cohorts. Expanded Disability Status Scale scores were stable versus baseline. Adverse events were experienced by similar proportions in both cohorts during fingolimod treatment. Relevant differences exist in disease activity and comorbidities between patients receiving fingolimod in clinical practice versus RCTs. Irrespective of baseline differences indicating a higher proportion at an advanced stage of multiple sclerosis in the real world versus RCTs, fingolimod remains effective, with a manageable safety profile. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s13311-017-0595-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2017-12-22 2018-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5794706/ /pubmed/29274026 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13311-017-0595-y Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ziemssen, Tjalf Lang, Michael Tackenberg, Björn Schmidt, Stephan Albrecht, Holger Klotz, Luisa Haas, Judith Lassek, Christoph Medin, Jennie Cornelissen, Christian Clinical and Demographic Profile of Patients Receiving Fingolimod in Clinical Practice in Germany and the Benefit–Risk Profile of Fingolimod After 1 Year of Treatment: Initial Results From the Observational, Noninterventional Study PANGAEA |
title | Clinical and Demographic Profile of Patients Receiving Fingolimod in Clinical Practice in Germany and the Benefit–Risk Profile of Fingolimod After 1 Year of Treatment: Initial Results From the Observational, Noninterventional Study PANGAEA |
title_full | Clinical and Demographic Profile of Patients Receiving Fingolimod in Clinical Practice in Germany and the Benefit–Risk Profile of Fingolimod After 1 Year of Treatment: Initial Results From the Observational, Noninterventional Study PANGAEA |
title_fullStr | Clinical and Demographic Profile of Patients Receiving Fingolimod in Clinical Practice in Germany and the Benefit–Risk Profile of Fingolimod After 1 Year of Treatment: Initial Results From the Observational, Noninterventional Study PANGAEA |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical and Demographic Profile of Patients Receiving Fingolimod in Clinical Practice in Germany and the Benefit–Risk Profile of Fingolimod After 1 Year of Treatment: Initial Results From the Observational, Noninterventional Study PANGAEA |
title_short | Clinical and Demographic Profile of Patients Receiving Fingolimod in Clinical Practice in Germany and the Benefit–Risk Profile of Fingolimod After 1 Year of Treatment: Initial Results From the Observational, Noninterventional Study PANGAEA |
title_sort | clinical and demographic profile of patients receiving fingolimod in clinical practice in germany and the benefit–risk profile of fingolimod after 1 year of treatment: initial results from the observational, noninterventional study pangaea |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5794706/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29274026 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13311-017-0595-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ziemssentjalf clinicalanddemographicprofileofpatientsreceivingfingolimodinclinicalpracticeingermanyandthebenefitriskprofileoffingolimodafter1yearoftreatmentinitialresultsfromtheobservationalnoninterventionalstudypangaea AT langmichael clinicalanddemographicprofileofpatientsreceivingfingolimodinclinicalpracticeingermanyandthebenefitriskprofileoffingolimodafter1yearoftreatmentinitialresultsfromtheobservationalnoninterventionalstudypangaea AT tackenbergbjorn clinicalanddemographicprofileofpatientsreceivingfingolimodinclinicalpracticeingermanyandthebenefitriskprofileoffingolimodafter1yearoftreatmentinitialresultsfromtheobservationalnoninterventionalstudypangaea AT schmidtstephan clinicalanddemographicprofileofpatientsreceivingfingolimodinclinicalpracticeingermanyandthebenefitriskprofileoffingolimodafter1yearoftreatmentinitialresultsfromtheobservationalnoninterventionalstudypangaea AT albrechtholger clinicalanddemographicprofileofpatientsreceivingfingolimodinclinicalpracticeingermanyandthebenefitriskprofileoffingolimodafter1yearoftreatmentinitialresultsfromtheobservationalnoninterventionalstudypangaea AT klotzluisa clinicalanddemographicprofileofpatientsreceivingfingolimodinclinicalpracticeingermanyandthebenefitriskprofileoffingolimodafter1yearoftreatmentinitialresultsfromtheobservationalnoninterventionalstudypangaea AT haasjudith clinicalanddemographicprofileofpatientsreceivingfingolimodinclinicalpracticeingermanyandthebenefitriskprofileoffingolimodafter1yearoftreatmentinitialresultsfromtheobservationalnoninterventionalstudypangaea AT lassekchristoph clinicalanddemographicprofileofpatientsreceivingfingolimodinclinicalpracticeingermanyandthebenefitriskprofileoffingolimodafter1yearoftreatmentinitialresultsfromtheobservationalnoninterventionalstudypangaea AT medinjennie clinicalanddemographicprofileofpatientsreceivingfingolimodinclinicalpracticeingermanyandthebenefitriskprofileoffingolimodafter1yearoftreatmentinitialresultsfromtheobservationalnoninterventionalstudypangaea AT cornelissenchristian clinicalanddemographicprofileofpatientsreceivingfingolimodinclinicalpracticeingermanyandthebenefitriskprofileoffingolimodafter1yearoftreatmentinitialresultsfromtheobservationalnoninterventionalstudypangaea AT clinicalanddemographicprofileofpatientsreceivingfingolimodinclinicalpracticeingermanyandthebenefitriskprofileoffingolimodafter1yearoftreatmentinitialresultsfromtheobservationalnoninterventionalstudypangaea |